Jump to content






Photo

THE QUILLIUS~PAXUS CITERION FOR BEST EVIDENCE - UFO/ET ENCOUNTERS

Posted by Paxus , 23 February 2011 · 460 views

LIST ET best ufo sightings ET UFO ENCOUNTERS CRITERION FOR BEST SIGHTINGS UFO
The development of the 'quillius~Paxus Best Evidence Criterion'

I recently came up with the idea to establish 'a list of best criterion for a noteworthy UFO/ET encounter'
UM regular quillius suggested we refine a list of criterion and publish it.
The point is to create a list of criterion for encounters, such that if a particular encounter does not have a minimum number of said criterion, then the encounter is not deemed worthy for further investigation, on the basis that there is not enough evidence to rule out possibilities like meteorological phenomenon.
If the encounter does have the minimum number of 'quillius~Paxus criterion', it will be considered one of the few best encounters and thus worthy of further attention...

OBJECTIVE: To rule out all possibilities (such as meteorological) except ET craft or man-made craft.
Note: By default there is technically always a 3rd possibility; that the witness(es) is(are) lying.
('craft' meaning a flying machine)

1. Credible witness'
2. Sighting of UFO is close to the observer (within 500m) <-? 1km?
3. UFO has some feature or is doing something which establishes it is a CRAFT, not a meteorological phenomenon (E.g. it lands on some type of
landing gear, it has portals or windows, you see occupants associated with the object, it sucks up water, it has markings like writing on it, it looks metallic and has separate distinct lights attached, a clear beam emits from it)
4. Radar image coincides with visual sighting.
5. Photo or video of sighting.
6. More than one witness sees same object and describes it in the same manner. (Better if witness' are not known by each other).
7. Physical evidence. E.g. depressions on ground from landing gear.

For an encounter to be deemed noteworthy as a possibly flying craft a minimum number of above criterion must be met.
This number may be a simple number (E.g. 4 criterion) or a formula such as,
Must have #1, #2 and any two others.

ENCOUNTER SCORING/POINT SYSTEM.

Goal: To establish a point-system for grade/quality of encounters. Highest number = best encounter.

DRAFT 1:


1. Credible witness'  - 1 point
2. UFO is close <1km - 4 points
3. UFO displays qualities that establish it is a CRAFT (E.g. it lands on some type of landing gear, it has portals or windows, you see occupants associated with the object, it sucks up water, it has markings like writing on it, it looks metalic AND has seprate distinct lights attached, a clear beam emits from it, it has landing gear etc) - 3 points
4. Radar image coincides with visual sighting. - 1 point
5. Photo or video of sighting. IF confirmed not fake.  - 2 points
6. More than one witness sees same object and describes it in the same manner. (Better if witness' are not known by each other). - 1 point
7. Physical evidence. E.g. depressions on ground from landing gear.  - 2 points

So, for draft 1 the maximum points (best encounter class) would be 14.

-----------------------------------------------------------------

---------------------------------------------------------------
quillius is suggesting a system with more criterion (criterion split into smaller categories) and more points.

I want a system with less criterion (5 only would be my ideal) with less points - ideal 10.
-----------------------------------------------------------------

DRAFT 2
- 5 Criterion - for a 10 point system.

1. Credible witness'(extra point if multiple witness)  - 2 point
2. UFO is close <1km - 3 points
3. UFO displays qualities that establish it is a CRAFT (E.g. it lands on some type of landing gear, it has portals or windows, you see occupants associated with the object, it sucks up water, it has markings like writing on it, it looks metalic AND has seprate distinct lights attached, a clear beam emits from it, it has landing gear etc) - 3 points
4. Photo or video of sighting. IF confirmed not fake.  - 1 points
5. Physical evidence. E.g. depressions on ground from landing gear.  - 1 points

==================================================================================================
Total possible points = 10 points

More refined:

1. Witness(es) - 2 points
2. Close - 3 points
3. A Craft - 3 points
4. Video/Photo - 1 point
5. Physical evidence. - 1 point

------------------------------------------


FINAL CRITERION LIST:......


1. Close - 3 points [COMPULSORY]
2.A Craft  - 3 points [COMPULSORY]
3. Witness(es) - 2 points
4. Video/Photo - 1 point
5. Physical evidence - 1 point
========================================
___________________________________ 10 point total

Therefore to qualify for the quillius~Paxus criterion, a sighting must be within 300 meters and the object must have features establishing it as a craft (E.g. Metalic WITH windows, or WITH landing gear, or WITH occupants seen inside or getting out etc) - I.e. Must have the 'Compulsory 5 points.

DESCRIPTION.INSTRUCTIONS FOR THE 10 POINT - 5 CRITERION BEST EVIDENCE SYSTEM

1. Close - 3 points [COMPULSORY]
- 'Close' will be a compulsory criterion which means the object is within 500 meters of the observer(s)
(Up to 1000 meters will be allowed but 1 point must be removed for each 250 meters farther than 500 meters. E.g. 750m will earn 2 points, 1000m will earn only 1 point)

2. A Craft - 3 points [COMPULSORY]
- 'A Craft' is the other compulsory criterion and this can be achieved anywhere the object shows evidence of being a machine, I.e. a flying-craft.
- This means it must look like a craft and have features or behaviour which support the hypothesis that it is a craft.
- Examples; has landing gear.
- Lands and takes off again.
- Has windows/portals.
- Has occupants associated with it (E.g. craft seen to land and occupants get out of craft)
- Suspected craft shines a beam of light.
- Object looks solid with definite lights (Note, an orb of light with one or two other colours will NOT count, as plasma might do this)... To qualify as evidence of the object being a craft, we would expect something metallic looking with symmetrically arranged lights.
- The object has markings or writing on it.
- The object behaves in a manner only a craft could. (It is unlikely that this will be used as evidence since many meteorological phenomenon can behave like craft.) It is possible that a metallic disc arriving from above, then hovering over water, sucking up some water (via tubes) and then departing may count for this purpose.

3. Witness(es) - 2 points
- The 'Witness' criterion is points achived for witness credibility. Witnesses who remain annonymous might be considered more credible than ones who want their name reported with the sighting.
- Witnesses who did not believe in the ETH prior to their sighting could be deemed more credible than ones who did believe in the ETH prior to their sighting.
- Witnesses who are writing a book or who have published a book about ET/UFO will not be considered credible for the purposes of this system.
- Professional observers will be considered credible witnesses. I.e persons trained in observation (E.g. Police, security, military, pilots, scientists etc).
- Often the 'Witness' criterion will be judged on many different aspects of the observer.

4. Video/Photo - 1 point
- Video and/or photos of the object seen by the observer will earn 1 point if, and only if, they have been confirmed by an expert as not faked.

5. Physical evidence. - 1 point
- Physical evidence as investigated by professionals such as disturbed environment (E.g. burnt or depressed grass, radioactivity well beyond normal for the areas, the UFO dropped something, the observer shows physical evidence (E.g. The observer was burnt by the object.)
- Radar or other detection evidence will fall into this category.




i saw a black craft, it was blacker than the night sky, like a stylized b2 bomber or something, it skipped in front of and behind itself as it travelled?! i posted info about it on my blog. i think this one is man made.
  • Report

Recent Comments

0 user(s) viewing

0 members, 0 guests, 0 anonymous users

Categories

Latest Visitors

  • Photo
    Andromedan StarSeed
    08 Feb 2014 - 21:55
  • Photo
    markprice
    29 Jan 2014 - 14:51
  • Photo
    bendigger0
    21 Jan 2014 - 16:15
  • Photo
    qxcontinuum
    21 Jan 2014 - 06:56
  • Photo
    ImmortalSupernaturalAlien
    11 Apr 2013 - 16:03