Join the Unexplained Mysteries community today! It's free and setting up an account only takes a moment.
- Sign In or Create Account -

All Activity

This stream auto-updates   

  1. Past hour
  2. However, the comet is not traveling in a flat trajectory - it's impacted by the atmosphere (slows it down) and gravity. If there was no atmosphere, it might come in at a trajectory that would carry it that far. If you care to tinker with the parameters, you can play at this site: https://www.purdue.edu/impactearth/ Now...as I understand it, the claim of "vitrification" is not necessarily confirmed in Peru. It was made by someone who looked at the rocks (not a geologist) and said "whoa! vitrified!" They do have vitrified forts in Scotland and some in Europe. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Vitrified_fort
  3. That makes no sense, I live in Canada and Trump was my pick well before the election started. Won a game I couldn’t even attend. God Bless!
  4. I googled this case about a very popular UFO in Turkey a few years ago but could not find a thread dedicated to it. This was another one I didn't know what to make of at first. Fortunately UFO Proof was able to present a good debunk. Check out below if you're interested. More often than not, video/images are misleading or require further inquiry into it's context and most of the time they are debunked. This is coming from someone who is convinced some UFOs and ETs are real.
  5. The program is to investigate UFOs, not aliens. If the Daily Express chose to misrepresent the facts then so be it.
  6. There is a problem true. It's easy enough to search. The link was via Daily Express. Would be interested in some feedback.
  7. Seems that your quote does not exist. It might be the case that someone lied about the program which is to investigate UFOs. It is not investigating aliens on Earth.
  8. You never answered the question. Are you finally accepting that it is not necessary to debunk or show UFO tales to be false? It is the responsibility of the UFO story tellers to show that their ideas have merit. It's a simple yes or no.
  9. First hand account of the sighting and video footage http://www.nzherald.co.nz/technology/news/article.cfm?c_id=5&objectid=11961730 More about AATIP https://www.google.co.nz/amp/s/www.bbc.com/news/amp/world-us-canada-42379749
  10. You will learn that almost no one on this site is going to go for click bait. Videos are often a giant waste of time. A 5 minute video contains less than 30 seconds of reading. Then again they are candy for the uneducated.
  11. Why not post that isn't of doing your normal childishness? Now I know NOT to watch that video.
  12. Fun? I lost my sense of humour for this thread long ago. And what's to debunk - what would you expect an analysis to reveal, if these are some sort of unknown plasma effect? And why did YOU make the subject of the thread ET, and now change the goalposts? And why is it that you will seemingly never, never, never, ever cite an actual image that you think is worthwhile and will reveal something through analysis? I'd be happy to show you what an analysis might entail, but during that process I will expect *you* to have at least a cursory understanding of what image analysis can and can't do, and the knowledge of when/why an analysis would be worthwhile. But if all you are going to do is snipe and make silly/smarmy comments and imply that people here are incompetent.... well, all I can say is that you need to post some actual CONTENT before your cred sinks to the bottom.. BTW, most of my (digital) image analysis involves no special software or equipment whatsoever - there's only a couple of things software can help with (mostly in regards to authenticity, not content...).
  13. Let me quote Forrest Gump, "Stupid is as stupid does."
  14. If you are interest in how many conflicting statements you are welcome to find that out on your own. Anyone that takes even a cursory look at the witness reports can find a dozen variations. I get a kick out of some loony site that "similar descriptions." That is the lamest description trying to avoid telling the truth. Some UFO promoters claimed there were over ten different models of UFOs over Phoenix that night. Haven'y you found them? So you only found one witness that stated it was planes? You really need to do some basic research. Just looking at the wikipedia or some inane UFO website gets you nowhere. A hint for you. Mitch Stanley did not shoot the video. Again you use the comments of the criminal Symington. You point out he did a pathetic effort at checking things out.
  15. see...youre doing it again!! YOU ARE GETTING BIASED OPINIONS FROM UFO SITES!!... you will never find the truth in such places....if ufo sites published the truth....they wouldnt get any visitors....surely you can see that by now?
  16. They don't have the timetable of when the courier driver of my area delivers either. Looked up reviews of the company and most are bad, I didn't pick them the sender of my item did
  17. https://www.dailystar.co.uk/news/world-news/667622/Alien-news-UFO-sighting-US-government-Pentagon-jets-video
  18. I know the feel
  19. That's a good site and explanation of this case. Bookmarked.
  20. It's meant to be here today, but tracking hasn't moved at all.
  21. Goodnight see you tomorrow. I'm trying to find where the hell something I'm waiting to be delivered is
  22. Goodnight! Keep the lid on.
  1. Load more activity