Hazzard Posted July 28, 2012 #476 Share Posted July 28, 2012 Somehow I have a feeling that we need a tad more than a little imagination. Cheers, Badeskov Agreed,... go down, bring up, check out,... and there we have it. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Jacques Terreur Posted July 28, 2012 #477 Share Posted July 28, 2012 sorry guys, ever since i was a baby Jacques i had a way too vivid imagination.... Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
badeskov Posted July 28, 2012 #478 Share Posted July 28, 2012 sorry guys, ever since i was a baby Jacques i had a way too vivid imagination.... No need to be sorry...a vivid imagination is good as long as it has some strings to reality Cheers, Badeskov 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Jacques Terreur Posted July 28, 2012 #479 Share Posted July 28, 2012 No need to be sorry...a vivid imagination is good as long as it has some strings to reality Cheers, Badeskov Agreed! Excuse me now, i'm out to feed my pet bigfoot! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
badeskov Posted July 28, 2012 #480 Share Posted July 28, 2012 Agreed! Excuse me now, i'm out to feed my pet bigfoot! I need some advice on that...mine seems to continuously raid what the neighbors put out for their cat.... Cheers, Badeskov Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Jacques Terreur Posted July 28, 2012 #481 Share Posted July 28, 2012 I need some advice on that...mine seems to continuously raid what the neighbors put out for their cat.... Cheers, Badeskov Simple: USE the neighbour's cat! 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
badeskov Posted July 28, 2012 #482 Share Posted July 28, 2012 Simple: USE the neighbour's cat! Uhm..I'd love to...but he ate it... Cheers, Badeskov Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
DONTEATUS Posted July 28, 2012 #483 Share Posted July 28, 2012 See just how easy it is to fall into the Abyss ? 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Jacques Terreur Posted July 29, 2012 #484 Share Posted July 29, 2012 [media=] [/media]As i said....Just a little imagination! And now: back to topic! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
FLOMBIE Posted July 29, 2012 #485 Share Posted July 29, 2012 It's a ridge, not a trail! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Abramelin Posted July 30, 2012 #486 Share Posted July 30, 2012 (edited) No, the thing is the head of nail. And it's not a trail or a ridge, it's just rust on wood. Well, if nothing better shows up, I think we've been had. . Edited July 30, 2012 by Abramelin Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
bison Posted August 2, 2012 #487 Share Posted August 2, 2012 Samples of the Baltic Sea object were reportedly taken on the last expedition. It was claimed that these were submitted for analysis, apparently to Stockholm University. This was on July 24th. The delay is getting a bit long, with no word about the results. I wonder if a university analytical lab would continue working, outside the regular academic term. If not, this could account for the delay, as the last term ended in June and the Autumn one doesn't start until early September. The results of these tests should. it seems, either confirm that the object is simply a rock, or show some material unusual enough to warrant further examination. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Paramys Posted August 4, 2012 #488 Share Posted August 4, 2012 It could be an ancient monolith that ancient people tried to move across the sea on huge rafts, just chucking an idea out as ancient humans loved to do things the hard way. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
1963 Posted August 6, 2012 Author #489 Share Posted August 6, 2012 Hi guys! For anyone still interested...?..here is a link to a radio interview on the Red Ice radio station with Peter Lindberg from the Ocean X Team from last night... http://www.redicecreations.com/radio/2012/08/RIR-120805.php Cheers. 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
quillius Posted August 7, 2012 #490 Share Posted August 7, 2012 Hi guys! For anyone still interested...?..here is a link to a radio interview on the Red Ice radio station with Peter Lindberg from the Ocean X Team from last night... http://www.redicecre.../RIR-120805.php Cheers. hope all is well 1963.... thanks for posting, just went to listen to it but sadly at one hour long I think it best when not at my desk hopefully tonight. have you listened to it and if so are you any the wiser? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Jacques Terreur Posted August 8, 2012 #491 Share Posted August 8, 2012 thank you for posting that! Unfortunately, my office computer has no sounds, and my new flat has (yet) no internet.... if ANYBODY on here is willing to give a short written summary on the interview, i'd really appreciate it! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Abramelin Posted August 8, 2012 #492 Share Posted August 8, 2012 (edited) Some new things from the interview: * The anomaly us circular, 50 meters in diameter, and 50 meters above the bottom. * Later on Peter Lindberg says the 'pillar' is 7 meters high.... Now what is it?? * They sent samples to Stockholm University, but the people there are on vacation now, so no results can be expected soon. * On the next dive (before September, when the conditions get worse) they hope to take real scientists with them, because they are just treasure hunters. * Geologists say it can't be the cone of a volcano, it's impossible. * The tract or trail near to the object is a 1000 meters long ridge. * The stones found on top of the object probably came from dropping down from melting ice sheets during the (last?) ice age. These stones have soot on them you can scrape off. One of the stones was, according to a geologist, made of basalt, and of a type you only find in the Mid Atlantic Ridge... The divers took that stone because it had no sediment on it, unlike the rest of the stones. * IF it is a construction, it must be a 100,000 years old, or 40,000 years old, but not anything recent. * Peter says he's not telling everything because a documentary is being made about it (before the end of this year), but they have some aces up their sleeves... And, most importantly, it is NOT a hoax. * He says it's not a meteorite or asteroid that hit the water because that should have left a crater. But it could have impacted on the mile thick ice sheet, and than sank further down. * On the next expedition they will look closer at the second anomaly that's about 200 meters away from the first anomaly. It's about 40 meters in diameter, or 40 by 30 meters, and has angular features. It is not raising 50 meters from the bottom. *They plan to do the 3d expedition mid August, but not later than mid September. * Disturbances of the electrical equipment happen when they are within 500 meters of the object. . Edited August 8, 2012 by Abramelin 3 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Jacques Terreur Posted August 8, 2012 #493 Share Posted August 8, 2012 Some new things from the interview: thank you VERY MUCH! ...enough to keep me following the story! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Legaia Posted August 8, 2012 #494 Share Posted August 8, 2012 I'd like to ask the rather obvious question that's been asked a thousand times already: Why isn't this story getting any attention from the media? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Gary Meadows Posted August 8, 2012 #495 Share Posted August 8, 2012 I'd like to ask the rather obvious question that's been asked a thousand times already: Why isn't this story getting any attention from the media? It was all over the news 2 months ago, but then the info coming out turned quickly into fantasy so they backed away. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
CloudSix Posted August 8, 2012 #496 Share Posted August 8, 2012 Some new things from the interview: * The anomaly us circular, 50 meters in diameter, and 50 meters above the bottom. * Later on Peter Lindberg says the 'pillar' is 7 meters high.... Now what is it?? * They sent samples to Stockholm University, but the people there are on vacation now, so no results can be expected soon. * On the next dive (before September, when the conditions get worse) they hope to take real scientists with them, because they are just treasure hunters. * Geologists say it can't be the cone of a volcano, it's impossible. * The tract or trail near to the object is a 1000 meters long ridge. * The stones found on top of the object probably came from dropping down from melting ice sheets during the (last?) ice age. These stones have soot on them you can scrape off. One of the stones was, according to a geologist, made of basalt, and of a type you only find in the Mid Atlantic Ridge... The divers took that stone because it had no sediment on it, unlike the rest of the stones. * IF it is a construction, it must be a 100,000 years old, or 40,000 years old, but not anything recent. * Peter says he's not telling everything because a documentary is being made about it (before the end of this year), but they have some aces up their sleeves... And, most importantly, it is NOT a hoax. * He says it's not a meteorite or asteroid that hit the water because that should have left a crater. But it could have impacted on the mile thick ice sheet, and than sank further down. * On the next expedition they will look closer at the second anomaly that's about 200 meters away from the first anomaly. It's about 40 meters in diameter, or 40 by 30 meters, and has angular features. It is not raising 50 meters from the bottom. *They plan to do the 3d expedition mid August, but not later than mid September. * Disturbances of the electrical equipment happen when they are within 500 meters of the object. . Thank you for this Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Legaia Posted August 8, 2012 #497 Share Posted August 8, 2012 It was all over the news 2 months ago, but then the info coming out turned quickly into fantasy so they backed away. Oh alright then. It's all fantasy folks, that's why the media backed off. Sheesh, wish they would've let more people know than username Jeffertonturner! Would've saved us all the anxiety! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Junior Chubb Posted August 8, 2012 #498 Share Posted August 8, 2012 (edited) It was all over the news 2 months ago, but then the info coming out turned quickly into fantasy so they backed away. Oh alright then. It's all fantasy folks, that's why the media backed off. Sheesh, wish they would've let more people know than username Jeffertonturner! Would've saved us all the anxiety! It seemed like a reasonable description of events to me, but I would have added boredom to the media's lack of interest as well. I think you should add JuniorChubb to the list of usernames that knew. Edited August 8, 2012 by Junior Chubb 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Gary Meadows Posted August 8, 2012 #499 Share Posted August 8, 2012 Oh alright then. It's all fantasy folks, that's why the media backed off. Sheesh, wish they would've let more people know than username Jeffertonturner! Would've saved us all the anxiety! Hmmm ok..or you could be a drama queen about it... Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Golly Buster Posted August 8, 2012 #500 Share Posted August 8, 2012 * IF it is a construction, it must be a 100,000 years old, or 40,000 years old, but not anything recent. * Peter says he's not telling everything because a documentary is being made about it (before the end of this year), but they have some aces up their sleeves... And, most importantly, it is NOT a hoax. Thanks for the summary. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now