Arbitran Posted October 9, 2012 #26 Share Posted October 9, 2012 That anyone could be so desperate to demonstrate the anachronistic existence of an item we know didn't exist in 1928 just astounds me... It isn't a cell phone. End of story. I frankly couldn't care less what it is; but the suggestion that it's a cellular phone simply needn't ever have arisen in this discussion at all. It's absurd. But either way, yes, a hearing aid is almost certainly what it being placed to the woman's ear; my grandmother used the same type of hearing aid (albeit slightly different; but then, different models look different, after all) when I was a child. 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
cormac mac airt Posted October 9, 2012 #27 Share Posted October 9, 2012 (edited) Now THAT is a compelling argument sir! I applaud you for that! I didn't think about that one. BUT! Could it be possible that the user modified it, prior to using it, to use radio waves, which are similar to cell waves, to make very short distance calls? Or perhaps a HAM wave? Modified what? And how would anyone get ahold of a cell phone in 1928? There were no electronics at that early date and no miniature power supplies. So one has to wonder, where's the rest of this "cell phone" and where is the wagon carrying the rest of the equipment and power supply? Edit for punctuation. cormac Edited October 9, 2012 by cormac mac airt 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Thanato Posted October 9, 2012 #28 Share Posted October 9, 2012 Well it's from a Film. who knows what Chaplin decided to toss into it. ~Thanato Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Dr. D Posted October 9, 2012 #29 Share Posted October 9, 2012 Actually, it's not from a Chaplin film, it is from the scene in front of the theatre before the premiere of a Chaplin movie. Now look, the claim is that it's a time traveler, right? We need to be a bit creative here, after all the claim is pretty creative in itself. So you can forget all about towers and who was the server. If she's from the future, she comes with her phone. She does not want to be conspicuous so she buys clothing of the period. Not knowing the technology of the future, we cannot determine if there would be dimensional service enabling her to speak to her own time, not the 1920s. Fantasy? Of course. But at the turn of the 20th century it was claimed that if you went 60 MPH in a car, it would suck all the air from your lungs. 200 years before that Europeans didn't eat tomatoes because they stirred the passions of young maidens and tomatoes would not be eaten for another 200 years. Do I believe this is a time traveler? No. But anyone who claims something is impossible underestimates the drive for human achievement. 2 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Insanity Posted October 9, 2012 #30 Share Posted October 9, 2012 Do I believe this is a time traveler? No. But anyone who claims something is impossible underestimates the drive for human achievement. Indeed. If a sentient being can conceive it and believe it, it can achieve it. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
_Only Posted October 9, 2012 #31 Share Posted October 9, 2012 BUT! Could it be possible that the user modified it, prior to using it, to use radio waves, which are similar to cell waves, to make very short distance calls? Or perhaps a HAM wave? Dear. God. He knows too much. 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
cormac mac airt Posted October 9, 2012 #32 Share Posted October 9, 2012 Actually, it's not from a Chaplin film, it is from the scene in front of the theatre before the premiere of a Chaplin movie. Now look, the claim is that it's a time traveler, right? We need to be a bit creative here, after all the claim is pretty creative in itself. So you can forget all about towers and who was the server. If she's from the future, she comes with her phone. She does not want to be conspicuous so she buys clothing of the period. Not knowing the technology of the future, we cannot determine if there would be dimensional service enabling her to speak to her own time, not the 1920s. Fantasy? Of course. But at the turn of the 20th century it was claimed that if you went 60 MPH in a car, it would suck all the air from your lungs. 200 years before that Europeans didn't eat tomatoes because they stirred the passions of young maidens and tomatoes would not be eaten for another 200 years. Do I believe this is a time traveler? No. But anyone who claims something is impossible underestimates the drive for human achievement. "We don't know what will happen/be available in the future" isn't a valid argument for what may have happened in the past. Unless your contention is along the lines of "she's talking to Lieutenant Uhura aboard the USS Enterprise". And no, I wouldn't believe that either. I never said it was "impossible", but then again it's also "possible" (hypothetically speaking) that the supermassive black hole at the center of our galaxy is also the drain for a galactic toilet and we're just waiting for our turn to get flushed. It shows as much a lack of evidence as this time travel claim. cormac 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
_Only Posted October 9, 2012 #33 Share Posted October 9, 2012 (edited) Modified what? And how would anyone get ahold of a cell phone in 1928? There were no electronics at that early date and no miniature power supplies. So one has to wonder, where's the rest of this "cell phone" and where is the wagon carrying the rest of the equipment and power supply? Edit for punctuation. cormac I think what he is getting at is that it is some sort of highly modified phone version of a DeLorean brought from the future, somehow tweaked to run without any additional usual outside cellular phone use accoutrement. "But Doc, what about cell towers?" "We won't need cell towers where we're going.." Edited October 9, 2012 by _Only 2 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
soldier4death Posted October 9, 2012 #34 Share Posted October 9, 2012 Looks like the new iphone 6 that's coming out next week. 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
cormac mac airt Posted October 9, 2012 #35 Share Posted October 9, 2012 I think what he is getting at is that it is some sort of highly modified phone version of a DeLorean brought from the future. Perhaps but since time travel itself hasn't been shown to be a fact, it's rather pointless in anyone making claims of something having been taken back in time because of it. Another case of cart before the horse IMO. cormac 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Hasina Posted October 9, 2012 #36 Share Posted October 9, 2012 The reason I've argued against this is because... it's me, from the future who went back in time to escape the T-800 that's trying to kill me. The phone? I was hungry and was ordering time pizza delivery. 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
coolguy Posted October 9, 2012 #37 Share Posted October 9, 2012 I saw this on another forum its kinda cool.it might be the lady is just nuts and she thinks she is on the phone.. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Alienated Being Posted October 9, 2012 #38 Share Posted October 9, 2012 (edited) Dammit, somebody has already beaten me to the "antique hearing aid". EDIT: Lol @ the OP. Edited October 9, 2012 by Alienated Being 3 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
booNyzarC Posted October 9, 2012 #39 Share Posted October 9, 2012 Good lord, someone actually buys this crap? Egads. 4 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Alienated Being Posted October 9, 2012 #40 Share Posted October 9, 2012 Good lord, someone actually buys this crap? Egads. Hence why I loled at the OP. 3 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
tipotep Posted October 9, 2012 #41 Share Posted October 9, 2012 Good lord, someone actually buys this crap? Egads. Funny .... I was just thinking the same thing . TiP. 2 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Sir Wearer of Hats Posted October 9, 2012 #42 Share Posted October 9, 2012 assuming for a moment it is a mobile phone, who is she talking to? There is no signal tower to boost the signal to reach a satellite. Of course, it could be a future phone that can boost it's own signal to reach a satellite. Of course, there were no satellites, unless there were of course and we don't know about them. So we have a time traveller using a future phone to call someone using a satellite that we don't know if it exists at all. Or ... it could be a hearing aid. Occam's Mobile Phone only rings for one of these calls you know. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
booNyzarC Posted October 9, 2012 #43 Share Posted October 9, 2012 Fortunately the always sexy and exceptionally bright Hasina has once again taken the stance of reason in the face of such nonsense. Bravo good lady. Bravo. 2 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Alienated Being Posted October 9, 2012 #44 Share Posted October 9, 2012 Fortunately the always sexy and exceptionally bright Hasina has once again taken the stance of reason in the face of such nonsense. Bravo good lady. Bravo. You ****ing suck-up. With regards to the actual "topic"... I bet this lady's provider was Koodo. 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Likely Guy Posted October 9, 2012 #45 Share Posted October 9, 2012 No one has invoked Occam's razor yet? Tsk, tsk! Logical answer (thanks Hasina), a period hearing aid/device. Once you can fully disprove the logical answer, only then you can entertain the more fanciful explanations. As an aside, on a different forum someone tried to raise another 'time traveller' in a photo from a 1930's World Exhibition photograph. In a crowd of about thirty or 40 people was one guy who looked like a stereotypical beatnik from the early 1960's (cheezy beard, t-shirt, glasses and all). Time traveller, or a guy that just had forward thinking fashion sense? What's the more logical answer? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
_Only Posted October 9, 2012 #46 Share Posted October 9, 2012 Fortunately the always sexy and exceptionally bright Hasina has once again taken the stance of reason in the face of such nonsense. Bravo good lady. Bravo. Yeah, what a hero. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
booNyzarC Posted October 9, 2012 #47 Share Posted October 9, 2012 (edited) Nevermind. Edited October 9, 2012 by booNyzarC 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Likely Guy Posted October 9, 2012 #48 Share Posted October 9, 2012 The reason I've argued against this is because... it's me, from the future who went back in time to escape the T-800 that's trying to kill me. The phone? I was hungry and was ordering time pizza delivery. "It's there in 80 years, or, you get it free!"/84 year old pizza should be free.//and Hat's off to, Wearer of Hats, for mentioning Occam first. You get a free slice of antiquated pizza. Enjoy! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
_Only Posted October 9, 2012 #49 Share Posted October 9, 2012 (edited) No one has invoked Occam's razor yet? Tsk, tsk! Logical answer (thanks Hasina), a period hearing aid/device. Once you can fully disprove the logical answer, only then you can entertain the more fanciful explanations. As an aside, on a different forum someone tried to raise another 'time traveller' in a photo from a 1930's World Exhibition photograph. In a crowd of about thirty or 40 people was one guy who looked like a stereotypical beatnik from the early 1960's (cheezy beard, t-shirt, glasses and all). Time traveller, or a guy that just had forward thinking fashion sense? What's the more logical answer? I don't know, that thread made it here in a few threads of its own, too. In my opinion, he wasn't even out of fit for the time. You decide (sunglasses and shirt/jacket/hairstyle has been shown in equivalent time period photos in other threads): Edited October 9, 2012 by _Only 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
booNyzarC Posted October 9, 2012 #50 Share Posted October 9, 2012 (edited) Nevermind. Edited October 9, 2012 by booNyzarC 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now