Jump to content
Join the Unexplained Mysteries community today! It's free and setting up an account only takes a moment.
- Sign In or Create Account -

UFO spotted over Denver


Recommended Posts

Its not bug,bugs,insects,or even potatoes ! IMO its just a as it looks to be ! UFO. any takers? :alien::tsu:

Link to comment
Share on other sites

:innocent:

:whistle:

PierredeFermatandthefly.gif

:whistle:

:P

:nw::nw::nw::nw::nw::nw::nw::nw::nw::nw::nw::nw::nw::nw::nw::nw:

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

On the 3rd pic look to the left approx 1 inch above the horizon (that's Jersey visible on the horizon looking in a SE direction).

Ok...I see why I missed it. I thought it was a dustmite on my monitor.

So where are you going with this?

Personally, I'd say bugs or birds is what you have here.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

:innocent:

:whistle:

PierredeFermatandthefly.gif

:whistle:

:P

Dear God. I almost peed myself when I scrolled down to see that!

10/10 for originality and 10/10 for creativity.

So...I take it you think we're looking at bugs eh?

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Zoser, you are by far the King of Hijacking threads to make them your own........

No, you are the God of Hijacking threads.....

As long as you are enjoying it all. Please feel to contribute to the thread in any constructive way.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Ok...I see why I missed it. I thought it was a dustmite on my monitor.

So where are you going with this?

Personally, I'd say bugs or birds is what you have here.

A bird has wings. There were no bugs around that day that we noticed. It's the temperate northern hemisphere not the sub-tropics.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Just let me put in few more little points in response to my critics:

For a start more damage has been done to put and an end to threads in the way of rubbishing the OP with cynicism, ridicule or school boy banter than I could ever manage to do by uploading a few pictures with black objects on them.

Those people know who they are; it doesn't need me to point out what is plainly obvious.

If a thread takes on a slightly different turn with other material that needs investigating, then so be it. I won't be put off by cynics shouting out 'bugs' for one minute. That may well satisfy them but it will never satisfy me.

Just because there isn't an object in the picture that looks like the size of the Enterprise does not make the object any less interesting from a UFO point of view. If anyone has the wit to look at the trends in ufology over the last 10 years I would have thought they would have realised that objects that are being seen are smaller in size these days.

I'm sure with a bit of personal adding up that one could have reached that conclusion; but that's for them. The object in the Denver video is one such good example.

The other thing that is blatantly obvious is that as soon as a case presents itself for which there is no explanation one of two things happen: The skeptics refrain from posting altogether, as though affected by some mass walk out, or they post ridiculing graphics or similar cynical remarks.

I stand against that.

I value anyone who presents interesting and original cases, easily explainable or otherwise, because we all learn.

So the challenge is still there I'm afraid; no the Denver object is not a bug, neither is the anomaly on the Sark photos and to try and dismiss the case as easily as that is not doing justice to the OP or indeed the subject.

So in my adding up there are at last two cases that stand proud as unexplained smoking gun type evidence:

The Denver Case and the Denbigh case in Wales of Jan 2012 (see TT thread).

This forum really is starting to get interesting.

Be back in a few hours.

z

  • Like 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

[media=]http://www.youtube.com/watch?feature=player_embedded&v=1AEQgEFqE40[/media]

This is the news report of it and the "Aviation expert" clearly states it is not a bug, plane, helicopter or anything he knows of.

Isn't this the same aviation expert that had his license revoked for lying?

Also, he flew planes and gave training seminars (from what little i've read), how does that make him an expert in video analysis? ...because tbh, unless he can analyse that video in order to determine distances, size, speed etc, then i'm not sure his opinion is any more credible then yours or mine.

  • Like 5
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Can some one tell me how it's NOT a toy/model blimp?

And if it isn't visible to the naked eye...how does he know where to film?

Nibs

Ok, this is from Utah but...you get the idea.

blimp_ufo.jpg

I want one of them, no really I do.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

A bird has wings. There were no bugs around that day that we noticed. It's the temperate northern hemisphere not the sub-tropics.

Because you didn't notice bugs, doesn't mean you can exclude that possibility.

Depending on the viewing angle and position of their wings, birds could appear just as a dark spot like that.

Songbirds, for instance, do the flutter/fold technique, where often their wings are completely against their body as if at rest.

I live in the Northern Hemisphere, currently at night it is frequently below freezing. Last night was no exception, and when I went outside this morning, there are still flies making an appearance.

I'm not saying your photos are definately bugs or birds, I feel that has to be considered as a possibility.

I don't believe you can discount that.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Isn't this the same aviation expert that had his license revoked for lying?

Also, he flew planes and gave training seminars (from what little i've read), how does that make him an expert in video analysis? ...because tbh, unless he can analyse that video in order to determine distances, size, speed etc, then i'm not sure his opinion is any more credible then yours or mine.

Well if what you are saying is true then obviously his opinion is worthless.

The news team did record the objects with their own equipment as well. So that kinda proves they are real. (real as in not a manipulated video) That depends on how much you trust Fox news though.

A bird has wings. There were no bugs around that day that we noticed. It's the temperate northern hemisphere not the sub-tropics.

In fairness I seen a wasp 4 days ago and a huge blue bottle 2 days ago... It's absolutely freezing here just now (East of England)

Edited by Coffey
  • Like 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Someone tell me that the bugs this falcon is catching don't look anything like the OP video...

In particular, from about the 26 second mark...

  • Like 5
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Here's some more. Pretty dull, but if you jump to the 1:30 mark or so and watch until about 2:00, you can see several examples of how fruit flies look in footage like this.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Someone tell me that the bugs this falcon is catching don't look anything like the OP video...

In particular, from about the 26 second mark...

Learn something every day. I din't know falcons bothered to eat bugs. Makes sense tho' highly nutritious and a low-risk meal.

Incredibly skill.

I have trouble nailing a stationary fly with a newspaper.

  • Like 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Someone tell me that the bugs this falcon is catching don't look anything like the OP video...

In particular, from about the 26 second mark...

Yeah that looks identical.

So obviously just filming insects, Fox news filmed them as well and the "aviation expert" is an idiot and fraud.

Case closed then.

  • Like 3
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Isn't this the same aviation expert that had his license revoked for lying?

Is it? Validation is everything. Lying about what? His tax bill? This is ufology and he is giving evidence as an expert witness.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Well if what you are saying is true then obviously his opinion is worthless.

The news team did record the objects with their own equipment as well. So that kinda proves they are real. (real as in not a manipulated video) That depends on how much you trust Fox news though.

In fairness I seen a wasp 4 days ago and a huge blue bottle 2 days ago... It's absolutely freezing here just now (East of England)

Yes people seem to think that we all live in the subtropics and Sark for example is swarming with bugs. Nothing could be further from the truth. I don't know what region of the planet they are describing but the UK just is not like that at this time of year.

Scotland has more than is fair share of mosquito's in a similar way to say parts of Canada even Alaska in Summer. Not so with other parts of the UK.

Edited by zoser
Link to comment
Share on other sites

A bird has wings. There were no bugs around that day that we noticed. It's the temperate northern hemisphere not the sub-tropics.

Insects are an important and abundant part of most ecosystems in temperate regions. This is true year round, but they are more active and prevalent in the warmer seasons. From your photographs we can tell that it was a beautiful day, the sun was out, you were in an area near the ocean with a lot of fields, farmhouses with livestock. Whether you noticed any bugs or not, I guarantee you that there were a lot there.

Just let me put in few more little points in response to my critics:

For a start more damage has been done to put and an end to threads in the way of rubbishing the OP with cynicism, ridicule or school boy banter than I could ever manage to do by uploading a few pictures with black objects on them.

Those people know who they are; it doesn't need me to point out what is plainly obvious.

If a thread takes on a slightly different turn with other material that needs investigating, then so be it. I won't be put off by cynics shouting out 'bugs' for one minute. That may well satisfy them but it will never satisfy me.

Pointing out that footage and/or photographs look like insects is not cynicism, it is merely the observation of identifiable traits which are characteristic of how insects appear in such media. Whether you recognize the similarities or not does nothing to remove those similarities. I suggest that you actively seek out footage which has flying insects in it for your own comparative analysis. I've provided a couple, but you can literally find this kind of thing in many outdoor videos and pictures. Bugs are everywhere, we just ignore them most of the time unless they become a personal nuisance or are swarming en masse.

Just because there isn't an object in the picture that looks like the size of the Enterprise does not make the object any less interesting from a UFO point of view. If anyone has the wit to look at the trends in ufology over the last 10 years I would have thought they would have realised that objects that are being seen are smaller in size these days.

I'm sure with a bit of personal adding up that one could have reached that conclusion; but that's for them. The object in the Denver video is one such good example.

The other thing that is blatantly obvious is that as soon as a case presents itself for which there is no explanation one of two things happen: The skeptics refrain from posting altogether, as though affected by some mass walk out, or they post ridiculing graphics or similar cynical remarks.

I stand against that.

I value anyone who presents interesting and original cases, easily explainable or otherwise, because we all learn.

We know that you are passionate about this subject zoser, and I both admire and respect that intense interest. You may not realize it, but we of a more skeptical bent are just as interested in the UFO phenomena as you are. It is a fascinating topic and covers a wide range of subjects.

You mark yourself as a 'warrior of truth' and have on multiple occasions communicated to the forum that you essentially consider yourself to be on a crusade of sorts to champion witnesses. A true warrior of truth would not be afraid to acknowledge the possibility of prosaic explanations. A true warrior of truth must be open to any possibility, and must not jump prematurely to any conclusions. A true warrior of truth applies critical scrutiny to every claim, whether the claim is supernatural, extraterrestrial, or prosaic, and realizes that "we can't be sure" means literally that we cannot arbitrarily ascribe our preferred answer to the question.

At best, these UFO cases result in "we can't be sure" though many of them can be explained with a very high level of confidence; like these photographs and videos which look exactly like insects for example. Even if we reduce, in our own minds, the weight of explanations like this, we still arrive only at "we can't be sure."

So the challenge is still there I'm afraid; no the Denver object is not a bug, neither is the anomaly on the Sark photos and to try and dismiss the case as easily as that is not doing justice to the OP or indeed the subject.

So in my adding up there are at last two cases that stand proud as unexplained smoking gun type evidence:

The Denver Case and the Denbigh case in Wales of Jan 2012 (see TT thread).

No matter how many times you, some self proclaimed aviation expert, newscasters, or any one else declares "it is not a bug" will not ever change the fact that the footage in question looks exactly like insects. Nor will it change the fact that your Sark photos look exactly like insects. Tiny little blurry out of focus insects. A true warrior of truth would recognize this and at least admit that it is possible, even if you weren't as confident about the conclusion as I am.

This forum really is starting to get interesting.

Be back in a few hours.

z

See you when you get back zoser.

Cheers. :)

  • Like 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Yeah that looks identical.

So obviously just filming insects, Fox news filmed them as well and the "aviation expert" is an idiot and fraud.

Case closed then.

It's probably that they have come face to face with something unexplainable; it's not the first time. Expect teddy bears to be thrown all over the place.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Yeah that looks identical.

So obviously just filming insects, Fox news filmed them as well and the "aviation expert" is an idiot and fraud.

Case closed then.

LOL Coffey....I think you put it in a nutshell

but the real mystery is why this video would be promoted like it has been on TV etc..... :huh:

Maybe it was to get the American Veteran's Day Sale more publicity... :lol:

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Yeah that looks identical.

So obviously just filming insects, Fox news filmed them as well and the "aviation expert" is an idiot and fraud.

Case closed then.

I'm going to assume that this isn't sarcasm. If it is sarcasm as zoser seems to believe, please clarify.

It's probably that they have come face to face with something unexplainable; it's not the first time. Expect teddy bears to be thrown all over the place.

No, it is because we have come face to face with something that looks exactly like how insects appear in film.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

It's probably that they have come face to face with something unexplainable; it's not the first time. Expect teddy bears to be thrown all over the place.

Just for the record.

I watched the Fox News segment about the Denver UFO. I don't think it's an insect or a bird.

Zoser...your pictures, are likely birds, and possibly, but not so likely insects.

Is anyone aware or any follow-up on this Denver sighting?...because IMHO the Fox News report is inconclusive.

Honestly, if I lived there I'd be taking 2-3 days vacation from work to get some serious photography done.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.