Einsteinium Posted February 22, 2013 #101 Share Posted February 22, 2013 (edited) i suppose it can work....my formula works for me as yours does for you So what is your point? You are just assigning numbers to letters and finding patters, which will always emerge in any word to number schema so I just do not see the point. I guess if you find this enjoyable then keep going, but truth, my friend, real objective truth, is not found in this way. Edited February 22, 2013 by Einsteinium Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
+Paranoid Android Posted February 23, 2013 #102 Share Posted February 23, 2013 as you can see the 96 or the 69 keeps coming up, does anyone know why??? Because your code is based on only ten numbers, statistically every time a 9 turns up there is a 1-in-10 chance that a 6 will follow it, and a 1-in-10 chance that a 6 will precede it. Together that's a 1-in-5 chance of either 69 or 96. Add in the fact that according to your code, the number 9 represents the letters "i" and "U", the number 6 represents "R" and "F", of these you have two vowels (which are present in every word in our language, except perhaps some words with "Y") and the most common letter in the English language - R. With this, the number 69 and 96 will crop up regularly by simple chance. ~ Regards, 3 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
kais_1 Posted February 23, 2013 Author #103 Share Posted February 23, 2013 Because your code is based on only ten numbers, statistically every time a 9 turns up there is a 1-in-10 chance that a 6 will follow it, and a 1-in-10 chance that a 6 will precede it. Together that's a 1-in-5 chance of either 69 or 96. Add in the fact that according to your code, the number 9 represents the letters "i" and "U", the number 6 represents "R" and "F", of these you have two vowels (which are present in every word in our language, except perhaps some words with "Y") and the most common letter in the English language - R. With this, the number 69 and 96 will crop up regularly by simple chance. ~ Regards, i personally think its the code coz i have worked it out even further than this in the past, im having difficulty remembering the next few steps. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
kais_1 Posted February 24, 2013 Author #104 Share Posted February 24, 2013 Heres another ORION ORIO -N 3 69 3 -2 33 - top level mason 69 - 666 code 2 - ??? Another mirror image...... Mirrors have cross-cultural significance as a representative of portals to the inner self or to another realm. The mirror as ''realm'' is considered to be a glimpse into an alternate self or place/time without the ability to interact with said self. For Meso-americans (Mayans, Aztecs) a reflection such as a mirror or oneself in a bowl of water was also a divinatory tool, they were used in festive dress for example by local shamans, to reflect bad energy and tap into supernatural powers unseen by the naked eye, because they reflect light they were also considered as sacred to the sun or light itself. Going back to the mirror as a representation of self, shattered mirrors for example tend to be emblematic of a ''shattered state of mind'' or a diffuse sense of subjectivity, a self literally lost amongst the fragments. When you think of the scientific use of mirrors in telescopes and what not, it becomes clear that the ancient idea that mirrors are a portal to the unseen is not so nuts, because that is quite literally what they are. Mirror image is due to the way a mirror works, a mirror reverses its left right, back forward axis, this used to signal to certain cultures that the reflection although is of the self, it is another self. A doppleganger figure if you will. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Orcseeker Posted February 24, 2013 #105 Share Posted February 24, 2013 ... Is this a joke? Other than that seems like a type of puzzle and prompted me to pull out my computing theory notes on grammars, automata, turning machines... Good fun. But actually meaningful compared to what I'm seeing here. So please don't try to assign such. Have fun. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
kais_1 Posted February 25, 2013 Author #106 Share Posted February 25, 2013 ILLUMINATI 9 12 12 9 1 9 2 1 8 9 FREEMASON 6 6 5 5 1 1 7 3 2 651 mirror 651 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
shrooma Posted February 25, 2013 #107 Share Posted February 25, 2013 (edited) yes it is made up, and it was made up by my brilliant mind, and it makes perfect sense . does it make sense to others *snip* or just you? takes all sorts to make a world I guess.... *snip* Edited February 26, 2013 by Paranoid Android Removed offensive comment/s - unacceptable even if intended to be humorous 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
shrooma Posted February 25, 2013 #108 Share Posted February 25, 2013 I worked this out ages ago and its quite simple Allah 1 12 12 1 8 13/13 8 M/M H or 112/112 aab/aab 211/211 Baa/Baa . roll up! roll up! watch the magician make the number 8 disappear! keep your eyes on his hands! can you tell how he does it? MAGIC!! 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
shrooma Posted February 25, 2013 #109 Share Posted February 25, 2013 (edited) "i am a imam (called) imy" Sorry, but it should be "i am aN imam (called) imy" then it dosnt work...well it dosnt look as striking works perfectly in English so its alll good . works perfectly in english, or doesn't work or look striking enough, which is it? you can't have it both ways, and with all things in life that make sense, if something is self-contradictory, then it's a sure sign that it's wrong. Edited February 25, 2013 by shrooma 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
freetoroam Posted February 25, 2013 #110 Share Posted February 25, 2013 12 123 1234 12345 123456 1234567 12345678 123456789 12345678 1234567 123456 12345 1234 123 12 Now we are talking! 2 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
shrooma Posted February 25, 2013 #111 Share Posted February 25, 2013 careful freet, one wouldn't want to incur the wrath of the gods, would one...? (or two, or three, or four....) :-) 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Quaentum Posted February 25, 2013 #112 Share Posted February 25, 2013 i think but i cant remember clearly enough but the 69/96 is the making of the 666 code, its the forumla for the 666 code do you get it? or are u lost? NO not lost, I just realize that if you play with numbers long enough you can get the answer you want. Numerology and Gematria have never revealed any secrets no matter how many people believe they do. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
shrooma Posted February 25, 2013 #113 Share Posted February 25, 2013 (edited) 666 ISN'T the number used in the bible, it was 616. , http://www.independent.co.uk/news/uk/this-britain/revelation-666-is-not-the-number-of-the-beast-its-a-devilish-616-526779.html see? Edited February 25, 2013 by shrooma Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
kais_1 Posted February 25, 2013 Author #114 Share Posted February 25, 2013 Ok lets go back to FREEMASON we have 6 6 5 5 1 1 total of 651 twice we need to make 666 for the rest, we have a missing 6 and a missing 9 add that to wht we have and we get 66551169 FREEMARI lets just find the missing letter any guesses? let try a 8 same as Allah with the H at the end and you get the spelling of HIRAM backwards... now thats strange!!!!!!!!!!!! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
kais_1 Posted February 25, 2013 Author #115 Share Posted February 25, 2013 . works perfectly in english, or doesn't work or look striking enough, which is it? you can't have it both ways, and with all things in life that make sense, if something is self-contradictory, then it's a sure sign that it's wrong. works perfectly and looks the business too!! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
shrooma Posted February 25, 2013 #116 Share Posted February 25, 2013 works perfectly and looks the business too!! . are you blind? or illiterate? (i have my own theory about this, but I digress...) the sentence 'i am a imam' isn't grammatically correct, 'i am an imam' is. but the correct spelling doesn't work in your theory, so you choose to ignore it. there's a term for that kind of bulls**t, see if you can figure out what it is.... Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
shrooma Posted February 25, 2013 #117 Share Posted February 25, 2013 Ok lets go back to FREEMASON we have 6 6 5 5 1 1 total of 651 twice we need to make 666 for the rest, we have a missing 6 and a missing 9 add that to wht we have and we get 66551169 FREEMARI lets just find the missing letter any guesses? let try a 8 same as Allah with the H at the end and you get the spelling of HIRAM backwards... now thats strange!!!!!!!!!!!! . what ISN'T strange, is that you completely ignored my post stating that the number used in the bible wasn't 666, but 616. but that makes your numerology delusion completely null & void doesn't it, which is why you ignoring it isn't strange. this is supposed to be a discussion forum, not your own personal blog. if you can't defend your 'truths', then try going on twitter with them instead. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Gummug Posted February 26, 2013 #118 Share Posted February 26, 2013 Well, Kais, I don't understand your postings, but you do kinda crack me up. 2 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
kais_1 Posted February 26, 2013 Author #119 Share Posted February 26, 2013 . what ISN'T strange, is that you completely ignored my post stating that the number used in the bible wasn't 666, but 616. but that makes your numerology delusion completely null & void doesn't it, which is why you ignoring it isn't strange. this is supposed to be a discussion forum, not your own personal blog. if you can't defend your 'truths', then try going on twitter with them instead. im not ignoring the fact that u posted the number maybe 616, but it seems to me that the scholars and priests who encrypted the code in the first place were unaware of this fact either Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
shrooma Posted February 26, 2013 #120 Share Posted February 26, 2013 it seems to me that the scholars and priests who encrypted the code in the first place were unaware of this fact either . I don't understand. are you saying that the scholars and priests who originally numerically encoded the bible were wrong? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Sir Wearer of Hats Posted February 26, 2013 #121 Share Posted February 26, 2013 . I don't understand. are you saying that the scholars and priests who originally numerically encoded the bible were wrong? Yes, because he's gotten the truth, but the evidence doesn't fit the truth, therefore the evidence is wrong. To quote my favourite philosopher - the very powerful and the very stupid have one thing in common, they don't alter their views to fit the facts, they alter the facts to fit their views. 3 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
kais_1 Posted February 26, 2013 Author #122 Share Posted February 26, 2013 . I don't understand. are you saying that the scholars and priests who originally numerically encoded the bible were wrong? ni im saying if its 616 they didint know and they used 666 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
+Paranoid Android Posted February 26, 2013 #123 Share Posted February 26, 2013 The debate between 616 and 666 is a matter of textual tradition. When the Bible was first translated into English the translators used a relatively limited set of texts which used 666 as the basis. Then as Bible translations became more common, textual criticism began to be applied and a wider range of texts were used. Because the first Bible translated used 666, that number remained (for the most part) in the main body of the text with a footnote asserting that the earliest (and therefore generally most accurate) manuscripts actually say 616. Whether it's a matter of a copyist error, or whether both numbers might have been part of the textual tradition (numerically, 616 and 666 can both be boiled down to Nero, depending on the language it was translated from), I don't think we can know. If forced into a dogmatic answer I'd probably lean towards 616, but ultimately Revelation is full of symbolism and imagery, so unless a world leader is trying to stamp a three-digit number on my forehead in order to do trade with people, then I don't think the issue really matters at all. Just my opinion, ~ PA 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
kais_1 Posted February 27, 2013 Author #124 Share Posted February 27, 2013 ILLUMINATI 9 12 12 9 1 9 2 1 8 9 another mirror image 912 12 9 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Quaentum Posted February 27, 2013 #125 Share Posted February 27, 2013 Invalid data results in invalid conclusion. You have been shown that the new testament was originally written in Greek so the valid data would be the words in Greek not the English translation which is invalid data. Your choice to continue to use the English translation means you are continuing to use the invalid data so your results and conclusions are invalid. 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts