Sir Wearer of Hats Posted May 24, 2013 #26 Share Posted May 24, 2013 looks like a long-distance, very blurry shot of a romulan warbird to me..... Nah, it's clearly a Leviathan like Moya. 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
SHaYap Posted May 24, 2013 #27 Share Posted May 24, 2013 Preparing to initiate the pixels enhancers ... stand by on RGB converters.... converting chroma luminescence sequence ... calculating hue and tint radiant overhead .. looks like .. like ... ~due to an unexpected fatal error Windows has to restart~ -press any key to continue - 4 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
DONTEATUS Posted May 24, 2013 #28 Share Posted May 24, 2013 Sweet one 3rd eye! 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
skookum Posted May 24, 2013 #29 Share Posted May 24, 2013 (edited) Arggh, Thats where my lost wheel trim got too. Edited May 24, 2013 by skookum Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
DONTEATUS Posted May 24, 2013 #30 Share Posted May 24, 2013 Sure its not Sir Branson`s StarShip doing a test flight with some of those hottie Flight attendants ? 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
SHaYap Posted May 25, 2013 #31 Share Posted May 25, 2013 Sure its not Sir Branson`s StarShip doing a test flight with some of those hottie Flight attendants ? you might be onto something here .... 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
AlienDan Posted May 25, 2013 #32 Share Posted May 25, 2013 A (probably fake) photograph. Big deal. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
highdesert50 Posted May 25, 2013 #33 Share Posted May 25, 2013 Assuming the photo is legit, a plausible explanation might be Grumman's X-47B drone which appears very saucer shaped from the side and was being tested in California. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
kapow53 Posted May 25, 2013 #34 Share Posted May 25, 2013 I have 4 of these on my passat Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
DONTEATUS Posted May 25, 2013 #35 Share Posted May 25, 2013 That made my day Third eye ! Thank you ! 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
coolguy Posted May 25, 2013 #36 Share Posted May 25, 2013 Could be a ufo Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
IBelieveWhatIWant Posted May 25, 2013 #37 Share Posted May 25, 2013 Youre trying way too hard. What do you mean I'm trying too hard?? I believe in aliens, I believe there is a strong chance they visited in our distant past. If your saying I'm trying too hard to seem I am unbiased because you believe I'm a skeptic or something, got bad news for ya your wrong. I just like to look at things from all angles because I go ahead and say alien spacecraft. Sorry if your not as open to other possibilities as I am other than aliens. Aw look at that I made an assumption about you that probably isn't true either. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
RabidCat Posted May 25, 2013 #38 Share Posted May 25, 2013 Distinct structures that appear to have a specific function. If you are able to see these structures in a photo, then you can tell the difference between a bird and a plane. If you can't see them, a bird and a plane will look the same. If you can't tell the difference between a bird and a plane in a photo then obviously the photo is worthless for identifying a flying object. If the photo is clear enough that we can see structures that don't fit any known plane then we can begin to speculate that it's something we can't identify. This photo is nowhere clear enough to begin that kind of speculation. I've seen jets flying around too. Does that mean they're all chasing alien spacecraft back to their planets? So your contention is that a flying object of whatever class must have some structures that are identifiable as having specific function? How about a Coanda Effect craft that looks virtually identical to what people photograph as 'flying saucers'? Such a craft has no identifiable control surfaces, no identifiable lift surfaces, and no structures that can be attributed to any normal function in flight. Coanda Effect craft have been flown for years in test settings, they have extreme lift capabilities, and whatever forms of propulsion are used (gas, electric, whatever) are well hidden within the machine. If you constructed a Coanda machine capable of flying you around, you would be driving a 'flying saucer' with no identifiable structures visible, and virtually everyone who witnessed such a craft would claim having seen some extraterrestrial spacecraft, even though a Coanda certainly would not be capable of the movements attributed to 'flying saucers' in general. Should the Coanda craft be constructed using electric power, it would be entirely silent, and further the idea that it is ET. Why don't you admit directly that a craft capable of space flight may well be centuries ahead of our own technology and therefore may not have any identifiable structures? Please don't minimize what I saw in '64. As stated, under those circumstances there was no doubt that the Phantoms were in pursuit of that white ball. Had you been there, you would have concluded the same. Making the sort of statement you make just isn't becoming of a reasonable intellect, especially without direct knowledge, which you obviously do not have since you were not there. That incident was witnessed by hundreds of people, all quite familiar with flight times and so forth since all had daily exposure to military aircraft. Further, I made no claims to the effect that any time a military jet is seen it's chasing something, did I? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Darth Tyranus Posted May 25, 2013 #39 Share Posted May 25, 2013 (edited) A (probably fake) photograph. Big deal. Thats always a possibility with most pictures. I just saw an interview with the woman who took the picture. She's an older woman who's quite spooked by what she saw she didn't want her face on camera. She also said her camera broke after taking pictures of the object. Edited May 25, 2013 by Darth Tyranus Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Silver Surfer Posted May 25, 2013 #40 Share Posted May 25, 2013 The only thing that can be determined from this is that the barn must be full of alien ghosts. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
SHaYap Posted May 25, 2013 #41 Share Posted May 25, 2013 That made my day Third eye ! Thank you ! You're welcome ... you gotta hand it to Richie ... he still can deliver the goods ... Such a character .... a good rich guy named Rich ... now that's rich // 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
skookum Posted May 25, 2013 #42 Share Posted May 25, 2013 I think UFO hunters will have to accept that pictures will never be convincing proof of existence. What with computers and photo software available it is just too easy to fake. We need a good HD film and it preferably interacting with something. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
mcrom901 Posted May 25, 2013 #43 Share Posted May 25, 2013 has anybody seen any high-resolution pics? i'm still looking for them.... Brian Haddock 19 hours agoVery nice shot El. Have you posted the original photo anywhere or is the video all that is available? A couple of shots before and after this picture would be good for researchers too.Reply · El Henry 4 hours agoYes I have provided before and after shots....I even have a shot where the object is much further away, and then the next shot it's right there...though I didn't see any of this until I loaded it to my PC.Reply · in reply to Brian Haddock apparently the barn is haunted and her camera stopped working... hmmmmm http://santee.patch.com/groups/around-town/p/ufo-photographed-over-edgemoor-barn-in-santee Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
SHaYap Posted May 25, 2013 #44 Share Posted May 25, 2013 haunted ... ? oh no ... does this means we gonna get evicted to the paranormal forums ?? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
GirlfromOz Posted May 25, 2013 #45 Share Posted May 25, 2013 What a joke! In the heat of the moment he threw the garbage lid to it's highest heights & to our amazement,we now have footage of a UFO! LMAO Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
GirlfromOz Posted May 25, 2013 #46 Share Posted May 25, 2013 (edited) A definition of a UFO ,an unidentified flying object.It was identified as UNIDENTIFIED!LMAO!How can anyone identify an object that they truly visually can not identify?It was a bloody garbage lid being thrust into the air!LMAO! Edited May 25, 2013 by GirlfromOz Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
DONTEATUS Posted May 25, 2013 #47 Share Posted May 25, 2013 I wonder if they Still have Cow patty throwing contest in San Diego? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
GirlfromOz Posted May 25, 2013 #48 Share Posted May 25, 2013 LMAO! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
mcrom901 Posted May 26, 2013 #49 Share Posted May 26, 2013 El Henry 4 hours ago Yes I have provided before and after shots....I even have a shot where the object is much further away, and then the next shot it's right there...though I didn't see any of this until I loaded it to my PC.Reply · in reply to Brian Haddock got a response, here are the pics... https://www.facebook.com/media/set/?set=a.658597007489514.1073741833.246831241999428&type=3 is this the same object? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
SHaYap Posted May 26, 2013 #50 Share Posted May 26, 2013 I think they found space kitty ... 3 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now