StarMountainKid Posted August 23, 2013 #1 Share Posted August 23, 2013 For the first time, astronomers have managed to measure the rate of spin of a supermassive black hole—and it's been clocked at 84 percent of the speed of light, or the maximum allowed by the law of physics http://news.nationalgeographic.com/news/2013/03/130301-black-hole-speed-of-light-einstein-science-astronomy-space/ 2 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
pallidin Posted August 23, 2013 #2 Share Posted August 23, 2013 That is seriously wild. A good job on the post. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
The Silver Thong Posted August 23, 2013 #3 Share Posted August 23, 2013 We need a pic of a white off shoot. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
manz Posted August 23, 2013 #4 Share Posted August 23, 2013 doesn't that mean the enitre mass is time travelling to some extent Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
brlesq1 Posted August 23, 2013 #5 Share Posted August 23, 2013 I'd like to see the results of their studies. Bound to be seriously wild. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
bassai26 Posted August 23, 2013 #6 Share Posted August 23, 2013 For the first time, astronomers have managed to measure the rate of spin of a supermassive black hole—and it's been clocked at 84 percent of the speed of light, or the maximum allowed by the law of physics http://news.national...stronomy-space/ is 84% enough to prevent light from escaping which is 16% faster? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Waspie_Dwarf Posted August 23, 2013 #7 Share Posted August 23, 2013 is 84% enough to prevent light from escaping which is 16% faster? Light won't escape from inside the event horizon whatever speed the black hole spins. 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Leonardo Posted August 23, 2013 #8 Share Posted August 23, 2013 (edited) First, this is quite awesome, but... Second - I think the title (and article) might be slightly misleading. The article reads to me that the scientists measured the rate of spin of the accretion disk - not the actual black hole. That's assuming the article isn't simply a bit ambiguous in what it states, for the sake of brevity? Edited August 23, 2013 by Leonardo Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Waspie_Dwarf Posted August 23, 2013 #9 Share Posted August 23, 2013 The article reads to me that the scientists measured the rate of spin of the accretion disk - not the actual black hole. That's assuming the article isn't simply a bit ambiguous in what it states, for the sake of brevity? No, the title is correct. They used measurements of the accretion disk to determine the rate of spin of the black hole. Astronomers detected x-ray particle remnants of stars circling in a pancake-shaped accretion disk surrounding the black hole, and used this data to help determine its rate of spin. You wouldn't refer to the accretion disk's motion as "rate of spin". Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Leonardo Posted August 23, 2013 #10 Share Posted August 23, 2013 (edited) Cheers, Waspie. I just found this sentence... "Astronomers detected x-ray particle remnants of stars circling in a pancake-shaped accretion disk surrounding the black hole, and used this data to help determine its rate of spin." ...a bit ambiguous as it wasn't clear the "it" being referred to in the last 4 words was the black hole or the accretion disk. And while a dissertation or article in actual scientific literature might not refer to the motion of the accretion disk around the black hole as 'spin', an article written for a general audience may do so. Edited August 23, 2013 by Leonardo Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Drayno Posted August 23, 2013 #11 Share Posted August 23, 2013 Wow! This is really fascinating.. 84% of the speed of light is enough to warrant a Doc Brown expression.. "GREAT SCOTT!" Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
spacecowboy342 Posted August 23, 2013 #12 Share Posted August 23, 2013 is 84% enough to prevent light from escaping which is 16% faster? The spin doesn't prevent light from escaping. Gravity does that Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now