Vincennes Posted October 7, 2013 #501 Share Posted October 7, 2013 Interestingly enough there is another element here that if the county could prove that they didn't know, they had no reason to expect wrong doing, it would lessen their responsibility. That would be another reason for their delay with their hands over their ears so to speak so that they don't hear things. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
simplybill Posted October 7, 2013 #502 Share Posted October 7, 2013 (edited) I should clarify my focus on the Mini. I shouldn't have mentioned it along with the bisexual scenario, as I think I misled some people as to why I thought Ray would be driving it. The first time I saw a Mini I admired it for it's utilitarian looks. I just now looked up "utilitarian" on Dictionary.com to be certain I was using the word correctly; one of the definitions fits my perception of Minis: "having regard to utility or usefulness rather than beauty, ornamentation, etc." In other words, I see the Mini as a great-looking, economy fuel-saver that doesn't pretentiously pretend to be a sports car (as some economy cars do). The more I read about Ray, the more I can picture him driving a Mini. He didn't seem to be overly concerned about projecting an image of status and power, other than the way he was always "impeccably dressed" in the courtroom where that image is an asset, perhaps even a "utilitarian" asset. In other words, a well-dressed, properly groomed prosecutor would sway a jury's opinion more than would a disheveled, unshaved prosecutor. Edited October 7, 2013 by simplybill 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
SuperSmith Posted October 7, 2013 Author #503 Share Posted October 7, 2013 I should clarify my focus on the Mini. I shouldn't have mentioned it along with the bisexual scenario, as I think I misled some people as to why I thought Ray would be driving it. The first time I saw a Mini I admired it for it's utilitarian looks. I just now looked up "utilitarian" on Dictionary.com to be certain I was using the word correctly; one of the definitions fits my perception of Minis: "having regard to utility or usefulness rather than beauty, ornamentation, etc." In other words, I see the Mini as a great-looking, economy fuel-saver that doesn't pretentiously pretend to be a sports car (as some economy cars do). The more I read about Ray, the more I can picture him driving a Mini. He didn't seem to be overly concerned about projecting an image of status and power, other than the way he was always "impeccably dressed" in the courtroom where that image is an asset, perhaps even a "utilitarian" asset. In other words, a well-dressed, properly groomed prosecutor would sway a jury's opinion more than would a disheveled, unshaved prosecutor. Ray liked sports cars. When the Mini's were re-released they had a pretty good following. They were fast, good on gas, and sporty. I see the Mini as nothing other than a fun driver which it has been repeatedly said Ray liked to do. He liked to go for drives to relieve stress. I think that Friday was no different. One thing I have found a little curious is that so many of his in office co-workers were on vacation or just leaving for vacation that weekend. You would think that with so many attorneys unavailable that Ray would've wanted to stick around the ship in case anything popped up. However he did have his cellphone. 3 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
lw-intuit Posted October 7, 2013 #504 Share Posted October 7, 2013 I'd like to add that when a journalist does an interview, whether that be via telephone or in person, they hold a conversation with the interviewee. They scribble on a notepad the high points of the conversation to later use in their article. They never use the whole conversation. It's called "taking it out of context". We do not know what leading statements were before the "underwear" statement or the following statements. Print a sentence such as that one and it stands out by itself however if you add it to a conversation it most likely loses its luster. Since it was a discussion of the disappearance of the county DA, why would any good journalist think that picking such a statement out of an interview and highlighting it is relevant to the investigation, unless it was for one sole purpose........to mislead, to usurp, to undermine? I question the motive(s) of both the journalist and the interviewee. What was the point? It's not like SteveS is said to have told the interviewer his answer to the question, but rather both leave the answer blank, but still uses the question to attempt to either direct or mis-direct public attention. That is not news reporting.........it's NationalE territory, where the embellishments sell more rags than the truth would, if the truth were known. I have had a tough time throughout the investigation with the 'misleading', and not understanding why it's necessary. I compare it to the JLuna case where an LE official is dead, and the cause of death is then blamed on the victim. The Luna case, in a manner, seems to have set a precedent for future work-related crimes involving LE officials. JMO 2 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Vincennes Posted October 7, 2013 #505 Share Posted October 7, 2013 Ray liked sports cars. When the Mini's were re-released they had a pretty good following. They were fast, good on gas, and sporty. I see the Mini as nothing other than a fun driver which it has been repeatedly said Ray liked to do. He liked to go for drives to relieve stress. I think that Friday was no different. One thing I have found a little curious is that so many of his in office co-workers were on vacation or just leaving for vacation that weekend. You would think that with so many attorneys unavailable that Ray would've wanted to stick around the ship in case anything popped up. However he did have his cellphone. Super, I'm really chuckling at this one. I can tell you have never worked for county or state government. It was a Friday in the early spring. I have looked around in some of these offices and wondered that the phones were even still on ! Really. ... We actually did have DA here that used to work on Fridays and even work late on Fridays, call and ask questions. He drove us fricking nuts because someone had to be there to answer his darn questions!! And, of course, sadly, he did not get reelected as he truly deserved to be . Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Regi Posted October 7, 2013 #506 Share Posted October 7, 2013 Patty Fornicola Only Oh. (I don't get it.) I'm not exactly hung up on it as I have run it through my thoughts as being missed and as them being planted later. Either which way doesn't get me any closer to suicide or walkaway. I think it's the notion that it was planted is what's hanging you up. (And I don't have to tell you, it's a notion that never made any sense to me.) Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Vincennes Posted October 7, 2013 #507 Share Posted October 7, 2013 Since it was a discussion of the disappearance of the county DA, why would any good journalist think that picking such a statement out of an interview and highlighting it is relevant to the investigation, unless it was for one sole purpose........to mislead, to usurp, to undermine? I question the motive(s) of both the journalist and the interviewee. What was the point? It's not like SteveS is said to have told the interviewer his answer to the question, but rather both leave the answer blank, but still uses the question to attempt to either direct or mis-direct public attention. That is not news reporting.........it's NationalE territory, where the embellishments sell more rags than the truth would, if the truth were known. I have had a tough time throughout the investigation with the 'misleading', and not understanding why it's necessary. I compare it to the JLuna case where an LE official is dead, and the cause of death is then blamed on the victim. The Luna case, in a manner, seems to have set a precedent for future work-related crimes involving LE officials. JMO Who asked the question ? I thought it was a profiler. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
lw-intuit Posted October 7, 2013 #508 Share Posted October 7, 2013 Ray liked sports cars. When the Mini's were re-released they had a pretty good following. They were fast, good on gas, and sporty. I see the Mini as nothing other than a fun driver which it has been repeatedly said Ray liked to do. He liked to go for drives to relieve stress. I think that Friday was no different. One thing I have found a little curious is that so many of his in office co-workers were on vacation or just leaving for vacation that weekend. You would think that with so many attorneys unavailable that Ray would've wanted to stick around the ship in case anything popped up. However he did have his cellphone. It was my understanding that it was PF who loved the MiniCooper. I recall a mention of her having a small model of one on her desk. RG had gone through the divorce, had money to buy PF the car she wanted. Same with the house, IIRC..........it had been her family home, and she was living there so why, after the sale of RG's house and divorce settlement, wouldn't he want to take care of paying off the mortgage if he intended on living there with her? She was almost 20 years younger than him, and it appears what was his was hers, with neither seeing marriage as a necessity. The house was close to business, and less expensive than if RG decided to go out and buy a place somewhere else. Seems to me, it was perfect and the best for both of them. RG was said to be frugal, so I doubt that he liked paying interest on either house or car. All makes sense to me without there being any hidden meaning to either house or car. JMO 4 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Saunterer Posted October 7, 2013 #509 Share Posted October 7, 2013 simplybill: Under pressure to do something more about Gricar's cold case, the DA (MM) asked the elite PSP-CIA team to review the local investigative effort and suggest other things local LE might do. The CIA team itself did not do any investigating. Duncansmom: It was not TSM that donated to a political campaign, but rather individual officers/board members (which is legal but raised some eyebrows anyway). The "Gay Ray" idea has been occasionally tossed around in every Gricar discussion forum I have read. One of the reported Mini Cooper sightings that weekend was at Shikellamy Overlook, a known gay hangout (according to locals there) just a few miles south of Lewisburg. If this is the big case secret, LE and the news media have been incredibly successful in keeping it quiet all these years ... not even a rumor having come from any insider types. 4 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Regi Posted October 7, 2013 #510 Share Posted October 7, 2013 From what I've read about Gricar's financial situation and in consideration of his lifestyle, what I notice is that there appears to be an overall lack of obligation. Now, I realize that he was twice divorced and those events impact finances/lifestyle, but regardless, I think it's worth noting because I also recall reading that early on- and despite his education, he was contented to stay home. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
simplybill Posted October 7, 2013 #511 Share Posted October 7, 2013 Who asked the question ? I thought it was a profiler. D - This was in the Sara Ganim article from April 2012: "A state police profiler began to ask questions, and some of them struck Sloane as pretty weird. “Have you ever seen Ray’s underclothes?” “Have you ever thought he was gay?” Gricar, with his mysterious demeanor, had always been the subject of conjecture for the nosy, Sloane said. He chalked the questions up to that." http://www.pennlive.com/midstate/index.ssf/2012/04/ray_gricar_mystery.html 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
lw-intuit Posted October 7, 2013 #512 Share Posted October 7, 2013 D - This was in the Sara Ganim article from April 2012: "A state police profiler began to ask questions, and some of them struck Sloane as pretty weird. “Have you ever seen Ray’s underclothes?” “Have you ever thought he was gay?” Gricar, with his mysterious demeanor, had always been the subject of conjecture for the nosy, Sloane said. He chalked the questions up to that." http://www.pennlive....ar_mystery.html My point exactly------------do you see any other questions asked by the profiler offered, such as those that might have led to the profiler determining suicide likely? In fact, according to DetZ, no report from the profiler was ever forthcoming, and no name for the profiler was ever offered. The 'friend' instead dangles a tidbit he is well aware that the journalist will latch on to. I remain firm on questioning the depth of the so-called friendship as well as the NationalE level of reporting. JMO 3 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
SuperSmith Posted October 7, 2013 Author #513 Share Posted October 7, 2013 Oh. (I don't get it.) I think it's the notion that it was planted is what's hanging you up. (And I don't have to tell you, it's a notion that never made any sense to me.) I don't "get" most vanity license plates but to each his own I suppose. Remember, the Mini was reportedly a gift. I guess the plate was an attempt to add cuteness....fail IMO. Nah, the fact it was in an obvious location is what led me to believe in the notion. At some point in this case you have to put trust or faith in what others report or tell you to get to any conclusion. For me the fact that I have been told by someone who was there, during the searches, that it is highly unlikely that it was missed leads me to that notion as well. But hey anything is possible. 2 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Vincennes Posted October 7, 2013 #514 Share Posted October 7, 2013 simplybill: Under pressure to do something more about Gricar's cold case, the DA (MM) asked the elite PSP-CIA team to review the local investigative effort and suggest other things local LE might do. The CIA team itself did not do any investigating. Duncansmom: It was not TSM that donated to a political campaign, but rather individual officers/board members (which is legal but raised some eyebrows anyway). The "Gay Ray" idea has been occasionally tossed around in every Gricar discussion forum I have read. One of the reported Mini Cooper sightings that weekend was at Shikellamy Overlook, a known gay hangout (according to locals there) just a few miles south of Lewisburg. If this is the big case secret, LE and the news media have been incredibly successful in keeping it quiet all these years ... not even a rumor having come from any insider types. Thanks, S, for the Second Mile explanation. That one really did spin me around when I read it. However, it is almost as bad that their board members had an established example of campaign donations... My eyebrows are raised. What the heck is the PSP-CIA team though? You guys could go work for the government with your acronyms! By the time I figure out what you are discussing or who, every one is on to the next topic !! LOL You aren't going to hear anything about "it" from the "insiders." That's been my point. 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
SuperSmith Posted October 7, 2013 Author #515 Share Posted October 7, 2013 Thanks, S, for the Second Mile explanation. That one really did spin me around when I read it. However, it is almost as bad that their board members had an established example of campaign donations... My eyebrows are raised. What the heck is the PSP-CIA team though? You guys could go work for the government with your acronyms! By the time I figure out what you are discussing or who, every one is on to the next topic !! LOL You aren't going to hear anything about "it" from the "insiders." That's been my point. PSP- Pennsylvania State Police CIA- Central Intelligence Agency LOL, we did have a thread dedicated just for our "acronyms" on our old board. 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Saunterer Posted October 7, 2013 #516 Share Posted October 7, 2013 PSP-CIA: Pennsylvania State Police, Criminal Investigative Assessment / Missing Persons Unit. Until 2004 its activities were played up in the PSP's annual reports ... although I have not read the annual reports for several years now. 2 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
simplybill Posted October 7, 2013 #517 Share Posted October 7, 2013 (edited) Since it was a discussion of the disappearance of the county DA, why would any good journalist think that picking such a statement out of an interview and highlighting it is relevant to the investigation, unless it was for one sole purpose........to mislead, to usurp, to undermine? I question the motive(s) of both the journalist and the interviewee. What was the point? It's not like SteveS is said to have told the interviewer his answer to the question, but rather both leave the answer blank, but still uses the question to attempt to either direct or mis-direct public attention. That is not news reporting.........it's NationalE territory, where the embellishments sell more rags than the truth would, if the truth were known. I have had a tough time throughout the investigation with the 'misleading', and not understanding why it's necessary. I compare it to the JLuna case where an LE official is dead, and the cause of death is then blamed on the victim. The Luna case, in a manner, seems to have set a precedent for future work-related crimes involving LE officials. JMO I think the sensationalism is creeping into these articles more and more because, after 8 years, the story no longer has legs. It would be difficult for a journalist to write an interesting story, considering the basic story hasn't changed for about 7 years now. There just isn't anything more to report on. In order to keep the public's interest, the writer has to either present new evidence or a new angle; at this point the only angles that haven't been worn out by past journalists are the sensational ones. Edited October 7, 2013 by simplybill 4 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
SuperSmith Posted October 7, 2013 Author #518 Share Posted October 7, 2013 PSP-CIA: Pennsylvania State Police, Criminal Investigative Assessment / Missing Persons Unit. Until 2004 its activities were played up in the PSP's annual reports ... although I have not read the annual reports for several years now. Oops, thank you Saunterer for the correction. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Vincennes Posted October 7, 2013 #519 Share Posted October 7, 2013 I think the sensationalism is creeping into these articles more and more because, after 8 years, the story no longer has legs. It would be difficult for a journalist to write an interesting story, considering the basic story hasn't changed for about 7 years now. There just isn't anything more to report on. In order to keep the public's interest, the writer has to either present new evidence or a new angle; at this point the only angles that haven't been worn out by past journalists are the sensational ones. Excellent point ! I can just hear Nancy Grace trying to make a show out of "Bombshell Tonight! UPDATE ~~ Nothing" 3 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
SuperSmith Posted October 7, 2013 Author #520 Share Posted October 7, 2013 Regi, I am glad we are getting along better What is your opinion on: The Code Book left on Mark Smith's desk? It was said to have opened right up to the section that guides how to replace a missing, deceased, or otherwise absent DA. What do you make of all the sightings of RG? Do you think there was a mystery woman? Why do you think the scene in Lewisburg resembles the one of RG's brothers suicide? What do you make of the Fenton sighting? What do you make of Lara Gricar's utter silence over the years? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Saunterer Posted October 7, 2013 #521 Share Posted October 7, 2013 LOL, SS! Not sure if this was the last list I put up, but it might help some here: ADA - Assistant District Attorney AG - Amos Goodall or Attorney General AGO - Attorney General’s Office (also OAG) AVM - Alejandro Vargas Mendez (or Mendez Vargas) BB - Bob Buehner BG - Barbara (Gray) Gricar BJL - Billy Joe Leathers BK - Bill Keisling or 1998 shower witness BM - R. Bruce Manchester BOT - Board of Trustees BP - Barbara Petito BPD - Bellefonte Police Department BS - Everything which LE and others have thrust upon the public ... without proof. CB - Carla Baron CDT - Centre Daily Times CF - Carolyn (Fenton) Larrabee CG - Chris Gricar CPV - Central Pennsylvania Vagueness CS - Cheryl Spotts DA - District Attorney DC - Daily Collegian DD - Duane Dixon DN - Dennis Nau, Sheriff of Centre County DZ - Darryl Zaccagni EG - Emma (Lange) Gricar EN - Erin Nissley EW - Ed Walker GJ - Grand Jury GJP - Grand Jury presentment GS - Gary Schultz or Gary Sinderson or Graham Spanier GVS - Greta Van Susteren JP - Joe Paterno JS - Jerry Sandusky KA - Karen Arnold (also JKA) LE - Law Enforcement LG - Lara Gricar LM - Lisa Mendez or Lance Marshall LMW - Lewisburg Mystery Woman MJ - Mike Joseph MM - Michael Madeira or Mike McQueary MR - Matt Rickard MS - Mark Smith NG - Nancy Grace OT - Off topic (also O/T) PB - Pete Bosak PDAA - Pennsylvania District Attorneys Association PF - Patty Fornicola (also PEF) PN - The Patriot-News (Harrisburg) PPG - Pittsburgh Post-Gazette PSP-CIA - Pennsylvania State Police, Criminal Investigative Assessment/Missing Persons Unit RG - Ray Gricar (also RFG) RM - see BM RS - Ron Schreffler SG - Sara Ganim SPM - Stacy Parks Miller SS - Steve Sloane SW - Shawn Weaver TC - Tom Corbett or Tim Curley TdB - Tony deBoef TG - Tony Gricar TH - Thomas Harmon TL - Taji “Verbal” Lee TMcK - Merritt “Ted” McKnight (or TM) TMW - Tyrone Mystery Woman TT - Tom Thal YITMAMPW - Years In the Making and Meticulously Planned Walkaway Theory 4 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
SuperSmith Posted October 7, 2013 Author #522 Share Posted October 7, 2013 The unfortunate thing about this site is we can't do our separate threads for the same topic 3 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Saunterer Posted October 7, 2013 #523 Share Posted October 7, 2013 Making the Shikellamy Overlook a more family friendly state park SUNBURY – The Shikellamy State Park Overlook has gotten bad publicity over the years due to reports of inappropriate behavior taking place in the park, including homosexual activity. http://www.wqkx.com/1070_WKOK/NEWS_ARCHIVES/020710.htm 2 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Regi Posted October 7, 2013 #524 Share Posted October 7, 2013 (edited) Regi, I am glad we are getting along better Me, too. What is your opinion on: The Code Book left on Mark Smith's desk? It was said to have opened right up to the section that guides how to replace a missing, deceased, or otherwise absent DA. Assuming it's true, I wouldn't attach any significance to it. What do you make of all the sightings of RG? I'd find them unreliable. Do you think there was a mystery woman? I wouldn't rule it out. I think if there was, then she's obviously equally as discreet as Gricar Why do you think the scene in Lewisburg resembles the one of RG's brothers suicide? I find that to be a chilling, haunting aspect. What do you make of the Fenton sighting? Who's Fenton? What do you make of Lara Gricar's utter silence over the years? I'd see no reason to hold it against her. . Edited October 7, 2013 by regi Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
simplybill Posted October 7, 2013 #525 Share Posted October 7, 2013 The unfortunate thing about this site is we can't do our separate threads for the same topic I think that's a great idea Super. I don't think the moderators would object, though someone should explain to them the need for separate threads, just so they don't "combine" the topics as they sometimes do. 2 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts