423 replies to this topic

[TheMacGuffin]

Slave2Fate, on 04 October 2012 - 03:38 PM, said:

You seem a bit upset that some people might actually be trying to figure out what this thing was. As long as they're saying it's aliens then it's ok right? Of course. Your anti-skeptic rhetoric and white knuckle grip on the ETH is only allowing you to see black and white. It's never so simple as that..

My dear Slave, I was asked specifically to respond to certain questions and I have.  You guys just keep underestimating me, evidently forgetting about my background.  I am not so easy to roll as all that.

So now I am just "white-knuckled" for actually answering the questions that the Septic Skeptics DEMANDED that I answer.  LOL

I just posted that picture of the "bird" because I found it particularly laughable under the circumstances, but all in all you should thank me for posting information that the "skeptics" just omitted for some reason.

[TheMacGuffin]

By the way, I am not "white-knuckled" at all, but just sitting here eating potato chips and having a hell of a good time. I will have to go soon, though, and tend to some other business.

[thewonderman]

seen this comment thought it may add to the disscusion:

This photo is unique. Im an architect student and I know a thing or two about perspectives. If you look closely you can see that the camera is angled down towards the animals. If it is a fake then the camera should be angled up above the horizontal line, but its not.

[TheMacGuffin]

And this is what the UFO looks like with some of the haze removed.

[TheMacGuffin]

And here someone played around with the image a little to get a different perspective.

Edited by TheMacGuffin, 04 October 2012 - 03:56 PM.

[TheMacGuffin]

If you enlarge this picture and zoom in on the right, above the bush, some people claim that they can discern the UFO moving off into the distance.  Given that there were five seconds between each picture, that would mean that it was moving along at a high velocity.  

Edited by TheMacGuffin, 04 October 2012 - 04:03 PM.

[booNyzarC]

Paranoia is an amazing thing.  You are so filled with vitriolic anti-skepticism McG that it is verging on disturbing.

[thewonderman]

There is deffinatly something fishy about this white light.

[Urisk]

I was initially quite interested in this pic until I read the immortal line "One and a half hour later... This is when we first noticed there was something in the sky" basically meaning "it wasn't until after we looked back at the photo that we say it" which always makes me immediately sceptic. How could one not notice that? Fair enough she's looking into a camera screen but what of her husband driving?

Anyway it reminds me a lot of those banshee things from the Halo games. From the front.

[quillius]

TheMacGuffin, on 04 October 2012 - 04:00 PM, said:

If you enlarge this picture and zoom in on the right, above the bush, some people claim that they can discern the UFO moving off into the distance.  Given that there were five seconds between each picture, that would mean that it was moving along at a high velocity.  

Hey McG,

this photo must have been taken 5 seconds (or maybe 10 or 15, if there were other photos in between).....before the UFO photo.

You can see the lump of rock in the distance in this photo, in the original photo with the UFO they are close to that rock.

I see the anomoly in the above picture that may well be the 'ufo' captured in the second picture.....I think this would have to rule out bug

[thewonderman]

Urisk, on 04 October 2012 - 04:14 PM, said:

I was initially quite interested in this pic until I read the immortal line "One and a half hour later... This is when we first noticed there was something in the sky" basically meaning "it wasn't until after we looked back at the photo that we say it" which always makes me immediately sceptic. How could one not notice that? Fair enough she's looking into a camera screen but what of her husband driving?

Anyway it reminds me a lot of those banshee things from the Halo games. From the front.

The fact that they we're both either looking at the goats and her husband was also or concentrating on the road, and if this is a craft then it could have been going so fast you wouldn't have spotted it with the human eye also add to that their was no sound then it could easily have been missed.

[TheMacGuffin]

booNyzarC, on 04 October 2012 - 04:06 PM, said:

Paranoia is an amazing thing.  You are so filled with vitriolic anti-skepticism McG that it is verging on disturbing.

And if I didn't answer the questions put to me, you'd say that I was just ducking and avoiding the issue.

It's heads you win, tails I lose, but I refuse to play that game.

[Sweetpumper]

That streak on the right side...vapor trail.

[TheMacGuffin]

quillius, on 04 October 2012 - 04:24 PM, said:

Hey McG,

this photo must have been taken 5 seconds (or maybe 10 or 15, if there were other photos in between).....before the UFO photo.

You can see the lump of rock in the distance in this photo, in the original photo with the UFO they are close to that rock.

I see the anomoly in the above picture that may well be the 'ufo' captured in the second picture.....I think this would have to rule out bug

Not a bug, balloon or bird, although it resembles none of those in any case, but I can see why the Septic Skeptics "forgot" to mention the possibility of a second picture.

[thewonderman]

How do you upload pictures onto here from my computer?