CakeOrDeath, on 17 April 2012 - 08:44 PM, said:
This kind of reminds me of the ol Gilfaer and Rosie threads.
Sometimes it is "fun" just to let them ramble on about their exotic existences and encounters with aliens and stuff. I think the only time we should ask for evidence is when they are making some "claim" like when psychics/mediums say "DON'T use the ouija board...trust me I know.." Ya prove to me, "you know."
But this was clearly just one troubled/lonely soul looking to share her fantasy land with us, she even said she wasn't here to convince anyone of anything.
I understand how hard it is to hold the tongue, sometimes you want to shake them and say "c'mon you don't REALLY beleive you're a draconian do you?"
Well we'll probably never know what they had to say now - which is the point i'm making.
We already know there isn't a single case or belief that stands up to public scrutiny, let alone scientific scrutiny, all you have is people's perceptions and interpretations...so when someone specifically states they are wondering about people with the same beliefs, why do we constantly get the same lines trotted out by the same people:
Where's the evidence?
Are you mad?
Have you thought about seeing a psychologist?
or, i'll wait for science to tell when we find evidence of aliens..
If you went over to a religious/beliefs forum and kept doing that, especially when the thread isn't saying they have proof of anything, merely striking up a conversation with people interested in that particular subject, it would be considered trolling....yet with the subject of ufo's it is deemed that people are fair game!
If two people were discussing some far out subject in the pub, with a few onlookers listening in, and some irritant kept butting in with unrelated comments about 'evidence', one of two things would happen, he'd either get a slap or the people having the convo would walk away and let him/her go and annoy someone else. On a forum it usually ends with the OP and interested people not bothering to post, so you never get to see what would be said.
Obviously some people just come on here to repeat the same lines about demanding evidence, regardless of the threads intent...well i'd like to read what's being said first, before the inevitable happens and they go through repeated calls for evidence on a subject with no evidence to speak of.
Sure, if a claim is made that they claim proof of, call for evidence - but calling for it on every single thread, regardless of the intent of the topic?? it's gets like groundhog day!!