The Puzzler, on 15 March 2013 - 04:33 PM, said:
The middle one could be the same as bode -
http://www.etymonlin...x.php?term=bode
As a shortened form of forebode (usually evil)
--------------------------------------
Maybe v is equal to ou or oo sound when used in the OLB, when it's not v or when just u is being used.
Thrvch = thrOUgh
Svn = soon/zoon but became son in English, a variation on soun/soon
Maybe even when it's an O after an I - ion - jon - jvn
I've only really glanced at it, but thought it might be a pattern.
Bvda might be more Bou or Boo - as said before beu - teu-ta
http://en.wikipedia....eutoburg_Forest
It's very late, I'm just tossing things around but now I'm going to bed.
I have become more and more convinced that the people of Bvda were the Batavians - though not at the time when they are mentioned in the OLB. The Batavians were an offshoot of the Catti, who resided in the area where the rivers Fulda and Eder are at their closest to river Lahn. Kattaburch in today's Kassel was their burch, which must have been founded after ca. 550 BC. It is first mentioned in the manuscript around 300 BC in connection with Friso, who sent his brother-in-law, Hetto, there. The burgh is not mentioned in the list of the grietmen.
As a consequence of conflicts within the Catti around 50 BC, a fraction of them were driven away. That fraction made its way south on the Rhine, where it established itself in the delta and became the people whom the Romans called Batavians. It is unclear whether the newcomers formed a ruling class and subjugated the existing inhabitants, or if the existing inhabitants were expelled. This was in a time without a folkmother any longer with power to avoid conflicts like these.
It was natural of the invading Catti branch to borrow its name from the burgh of Bvda and name itself something like 'Budavians'. The reason why they established themselves at the burgh of Bvda and the surrounding areas, was that they didn't want to lose the control they had had of the Rhine and its tributaries when they were a part of the Catti. Place-names like
Büderich (‘Buda Realm’),
Bodenheim (‘Buda Home’),
Bateige (‘Buda Possession’) etc. along the river bear witness of the 'Budavians' having had a need of marking their area through settlements and place-names towards their enemies, the remaining Catti; and several of their places were situated at the confluences of tributaries.
At first I wondered why not one single of these place-names are to be found along River Lahn, which runs east from Koblenz. There are also few along River Mosel, which runs west from the same point - after all, these two traffic arteries are the two most important ones linked with the Rhine; they meet and cross the Rhine at the so-called 'Deutsches Eck' in Koblenz. However, when I now understand the context in toto, it is all obvious to me: Lahn was the road to where the original Catti lived, who now were deprived of their control of the Rhine. However, they had probably managed to retain a certain control of Mosel, so that they could continue their trade to well into France.
Edited by Apol, 16 March 2013 - 06:02 AM.