Posted 29 October 2012 - 11:42 AM
My thoughts. Christ divided the world, and life, into the spiritual and temporal. Personally for fairly obvious reasons in the christ narative, he placed a higher emphasis on the spiritual, but he also recognised this was not the case for most humans.
He also taught about how to behave and to treat people on this earth, in this life. A person deciding on this issue has to decide which aspect of christ to prioritise and which to minimise. We can't use christ's surrender to the authorities as a good example because he had to surrender. That was his choice and purpose and necessary to fulfil his destiny.
It also depends on whether you believe in free wil or destiny whehter we can alter one future for a different one by the choices we make.
For example if I know that i cna make a differnce and save a persons life then i will act to do so. But if i believe it is their destiny to die then why should i bother. As a person who knows we have free will I also know that god intends us to have the capacity to act for good and for evil. Sometimes killing prevents a greater evil or destructive outcome. Sometimes failure to kill ensures greater suffering and destruction This was gods rationale with the flood and with the destruction of soddom and gommorah in the bible narratives about god. That god would expect us to think as clearly and logically as he did in those scenarios, and to act in a similar logic.
Actiing to good intent does not condemn a person. God judges our hearts and minds not our deeds and actions. We must do on earth what we can, in good conscience, to make the earth a better place. That is why murder is condemned in the old testament but lawful kiling is not.
If all killing was condemned then no lawmakers and guardians of the law would be able to pass death sentences or kill people. No one would be able to defend them selves individually or as a nation. There is no evidence in the old testamen ttha t this was the case. Quite the contrary, and christ really makes no case to alter the old laws or commandments. He comes to fulfill them not to remove them .
And so christ admonished people to render unto caesar that which was caesar's, or to obey the laws of the land in all civil matters. Only in the spiritual, do gods laws overide caesars. Life on earth and death is not a spiritual priority for christ. The spiritual priority in christs teachings come after this life although we are asked to live our life on earth as close to how we might live in heaven as is practicable.
I can empathise with a person who choses to interpret christ's teachings as absolute pacifism and surrender of this life, when required, rather than resisting death, and yet christ healed the sick and raised the dead; hardly the acts of a person who did not value life on this earth. If life on this earth has value, then we have a duty to protect it, and if that requires taking life to protect a greater number of lives or those of innocents, then i cant see christ arguing with that.
You are a child of the universe, no less than the trees and the stars; you have a right to be here. And whether or not it is clear to you, no doubt the universe is unfolding as it should.
Therefore be at peace with God, whatever you conceive Him to be, and whatever your labors and aspirations, in the noisy confusion of life keep peace with your soul.
With all its sham, drudgery and broken dreams, it is still a beautiful world..
Be cheerful.
Strive to be happy.