Jump to content




Welcome to Unexplained Mysteries! Please sign in or create an account to start posting and to access a host of extra features.


* * * * - 7 votes

The Ancient Alien Theory Is True


This topic has been archived. This means that you cannot reply to this topic.
10148 replies to this topic

#7831    Oniomancer

Oniomancer

    Soulless Minion Of Orthodoxy

  • Member
  • 3,380 posts
  • Joined:20 Jul 2008

Posted 28 February 2013 - 07:55 PM

View Postzoser, on 28 February 2013 - 07:37 PM, said:

In a tribal culture folklore based, one thousand years is nothing.  Someone would have remembered such a calamity.

Sorry to push the issue, but that is is the elephant in the room.  Until it's solved, AA proponents will insist and quite rightly so that PP is far more ancient than the Inca.

The stones say so, the technology says so, and the folkore (or lack of) says so.

These represent serious discrepancies with mainstream findings.

So we still have evidence of alien construction; not indians.

Yeah, if only those people would stop telling us about their origins and start telling us about their origins.

There are ethnic groups in the Americas who've only existed for well less than 1000 who can't speak accurately about their origins. Others in other parts of the world we wouldn't know about if somebody hadn't written about it and still others we've had to piece together. You're expecting way too much.

"Apparently the Lemurians drank Schlitz." - Intrepid "Real People" reporter on finding a mysterious artifact in the depths of Mount Shasta.

#7832    zoser

zoser

    Sapphire

  • Member
  • 10,009 posts
  • Joined:19 Aug 2009

Posted 28 February 2013 - 07:55 PM

View Postscowl, on 28 February 2013 - 07:42 PM, said:

So you can give us examples of tribal folklore retaining precise details of events from a thousand years ago that were proved to be correct?

Who said anything about precise details.  They had no written word remember.

Everyone remembers a severe cataclysm of that destructive power.

How would they not?

Posted Image


#7833    zoser

zoser

    Sapphire

  • Member
  • 10,009 posts
  • Joined:19 Aug 2009

Posted 28 February 2013 - 07:57 PM

View PostOniomancer, on 28 February 2013 - 07:55 PM, said:

Yeah, if only those people would stop telling us about their origins and start telling us about their origins.

There are ethnic groups in the Americas who've only existed for well less than 1000 who can't speak accurately about their origins. Others in other parts of the world we wouldn't know about if somebody hadn't written about it and still others we've had to piece together. You're expecting way too much.

And they forget cataclysms that destroy major sites?  Unlikely.

Posted Image


#7834    S2F

S2F

    Bloodstained Hurricane

  • Member
  • 7,175 posts
  • Joined:22 May 2008

Posted 28 February 2013 - 07:57 PM

View Postzoser, on 28 February 2013 - 07:54 PM, said:

No proof that the andesite blocks are to do with that comparatively rough foundation wall.  So seriously yes.

What on earth would give you the idea that it wasn't?

Show me any building anywhere throughout history that has a foundation crafted with attention to detail and craftsmanship mirroring the building above it and maybe you will have a point.

"You want to discuss plausibility then you have to accept reality." -Mattshark

"Don't argue with an idiot. They'll drag you down to their level then beat you with experience." -Obviousman

You know... the plural of ``anecdote'' is not ``data''. Similarly, the plural of ``random fact'' is not ``mystical symbolism''. -sepulchrave


#7835    Oniomancer

Oniomancer

    Soulless Minion Of Orthodoxy

  • Member
  • 3,380 posts
  • Joined:20 Jul 2008

Posted 28 February 2013 - 07:58 PM

View PostSlave2Fate, on 28 February 2013 - 07:46 PM, said:

Posted Image



As well as Jack and the Beanstalk too I suppose?

Ahha! Now the truth will out! This has all been an elaborate Hollywood viral marketing campaign!

"Apparently the Lemurians drank Schlitz." - Intrepid "Real People" reporter on finding a mysterious artifact in the depths of Mount Shasta.

#7836    seeder

seeder

    Nut Cracker

  • Member
  • 11,373 posts
  • Joined:21 Nov 2012

Posted 28 February 2013 - 07:59 PM

View Postzoser, on 28 February 2013 - 07:55 PM, said:

Who said anything about precise details.  They had no written word remember.

Everyone remembers a severe cataclysm of that destructive power.

How would they not?

http://archaeology.a.../caralquipu.htm

READ

Edited by seeder, 28 February 2013 - 08:01 PM.

Facts do not cease to exist because they are ignored
It's not the depth of the rabbit hole that bugs me... It's all the rabbit poop you stumble over on your way down...
“It's easier to fool people - than to convince them that they have been fooled.”  Mark Twain

"The tragedy of life is not that it ends so soon, but that we wait so long to begin it"

#7837    S2F

S2F

    Bloodstained Hurricane

  • Member
  • 7,175 posts
  • Joined:22 May 2008

Posted 28 February 2013 - 08:02 PM

View PostOniomancer, on 28 February 2013 - 07:58 PM, said:

Ahha! Now the truth will out! This has all been an elaborate Hollywood viral marketing campaign!

:lol:

I totally forgot about the movie! What an odd coincidence hahaha...

"You want to discuss plausibility then you have to accept reality." -Mattshark

"Don't argue with an idiot. They'll drag you down to their level then beat you with experience." -Obviousman

You know... the plural of ``anecdote'' is not ``data''. Similarly, the plural of ``random fact'' is not ``mystical symbolism''. -sepulchrave


#7838    DingoLingo

DingoLingo

    Psychic Spy

  • Member
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 1,114 posts
  • Joined:05 Jul 2011

Posted 28 February 2013 - 08:03 PM

View Postzoser, on 28 February 2013 - 07:25 PM, said:

Another point that is clear from this picture:

Posted Image

Anyone doing trying to do serious dating work on the foundation wall shown in this picture is doomed to criticism.

There is little evidence that this foundation wall is anything to do with the precision cut andesite relics.

This is the kind of thing that makes archaeology look stupid, unreliable and amateurish.

That wall could well have been done by indians.

The precision cut relics were clearly not.


ahh we are back to here again.. and the precision cut stones.. yes.. well all know how precise and square they are.. the episodes on Ancient Aliens showed us that ...


#7839    zoser

zoser

    Sapphire

  • Member
  • 10,009 posts
  • Joined:19 Aug 2009

Posted 28 February 2013 - 08:05 PM

View PostSlave2Fate, on 28 February 2013 - 07:57 PM, said:

Show me any building anywhere throughout history that has a foundation crafted with attention to detail and craftsmanship mirroring the building above it and maybe you will have a point.

It's like talking to children here it really is.

That you accept the notion without question that the foundation wall is connected to the builders of the andesite precision blocks is simply unbelievable.

No scientific method, no common sense, no reasoning used whatsoever.

Just childish minds.  I'm sorry but that is the only conclusion.

You wonder why an alternative version of history has been slowly building over the last 40 years.

Look no further than this example.

Posted Image


#7840    S2F

S2F

    Bloodstained Hurricane

  • Member
  • 7,175 posts
  • Joined:22 May 2008

Posted 28 February 2013 - 08:09 PM

View PostDingoLingo, on 28 February 2013 - 08:03 PM, said:



ahh we are back to here again.. and the precision cut stones.. yes.. well all know how precise and square they are.. the episodes on Ancient Aliens showed us that ...

Indeed. I've never seen anything more precise or square...

Posted Image

"You want to discuss plausibility then you have to accept reality." -Mattshark

"Don't argue with an idiot. They'll drag you down to their level then beat you with experience." -Obviousman

You know... the plural of ``anecdote'' is not ``data''. Similarly, the plural of ``random fact'' is not ``mystical symbolism''. -sepulchrave


#7841    zoser

zoser

    Sapphire

  • Member
  • 10,009 posts
  • Joined:19 Aug 2009

Posted 28 February 2013 - 08:09 PM

View PostDingoLingo, on 28 February 2013 - 08:03 PM, said:



ahh we are back to here again.. and the precision cut stones.. yes.. well all know how precise and square they are.. the episodes on Ancient Aliens showed us that ...

View PostDingoLingo, on 28 February 2013 - 08:03 PM, said:



ahh we are back to here again.. and the precision cut stones.. yes.. well all know how precise and square they are.. the episodes on Ancient Aliens showed us that ...

Another childish comment.

Does it look like the ancient builders needed right angles when they had the technology to do this?

Posted Image

You only need right angles if you need them.

They clearly didn't.

For God sake get some intuition before it's too late.

Posted Image


#7842    S2F

S2F

    Bloodstained Hurricane

  • Member
  • 7,175 posts
  • Joined:22 May 2008

Posted 28 February 2013 - 08:11 PM

View Postzoser, on 28 February 2013 - 08:05 PM, said:

It's like talking to children here it really is.

That you accept the notion without question that the foundation wall is connected to the builders of the andesite precision blocks is simply unbelievable.

No scientific method, no common sense, no reasoning used whatsoever.

Just childish minds.  I'm sorry but that is the only conclusion.

You wonder why an alternative version of history has been slowly building over the last 40 years.

Look no further than this example.

I'll take that to mean that you can't, which also means that you can't substantiate your position....again. Dancing around like that is just silly, who is being childish again?

"You want to discuss plausibility then you have to accept reality." -Mattshark

"Don't argue with an idiot. They'll drag you down to their level then beat you with experience." -Obviousman

You know... the plural of ``anecdote'' is not ``data''. Similarly, the plural of ``random fact'' is not ``mystical symbolism''. -sepulchrave


#7843    DingoLingo

DingoLingo

    Psychic Spy

  • Member
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 1,114 posts
  • Joined:05 Jul 2011

Posted 28 February 2013 - 08:11 PM

View Postzoser, on 28 February 2013 - 08:05 PM, said:

It's like talking to children here it really is.

That you accept the notion without question that the foundation wall is connected to the builders of the andesite precision blocks is simply unbelievable.

No scientific method, no common sense, no reasoning used whatsoever.

Just childish minds.  I'm sorry but that is the only conclusion.

You wonder why an alternative version of history has been slowly building over the last 40 years.

Look no further than this example.

actually mate.. I am going to agree with you slightly on this.. I actually believe PP is older then what is current believed age for it.. but as for advanced tech etc building.. nah..

as for the believe in a alternative version of history slowly building over the last 40 years.. you know.. I actually would not be surprised if it has dropped..


#7844    zoser

zoser

    Sapphire

  • Member
  • 10,009 posts
  • Joined:19 Aug 2009

Posted 28 February 2013 - 08:13 PM

View PostSlave2Fate, on 28 February 2013 - 08:09 PM, said:


Indeed. I've never seen anything more precise or square...


and another childish comment.

Are you sure he was not checking consistency?

Absolute childish it really is.

No common sense, no intuition, no reasoning, no wisdom, no respect, just pure products of a 20th century education system.

Just believe what you are told and don't think for yourselves.

Posted Image


#7845    DingoLingo

DingoLingo

    Psychic Spy

  • Member
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 1,114 posts
  • Joined:05 Jul 2011

Posted 28 February 2013 - 08:13 PM

View Postzoser, on 28 February 2013 - 08:09 PM, said:


For God sake get some intuition before it's too late.

A new zoserism.. well kind of.. we have basically been saying the same thing to you for over 500 pages..