Abramelin, on 23 September 2012 - 12:29 AM, said:
...
I know you jump into any (new) thread that has a post about ancient Egypt, like I would when it's about Doggerland or the OLB.
.
The answer to this is: no, I don't. Many if not most? Yes. That doesn't mean I'm inclined to join every discussion just because ancient Egypt is mentioned in the title.
I've only popped into this thread now and then. I'm not familiar with most of its posts. I would have missed where you specifically asked for me. If it was really that important to you that I add my input, you could PM me.
One reason I have not become active in this discussion is that I know next to nothing about the Serers. I don't know how much I can contribute based on them, and I tend to avoid Wikipedia and other internet sources for research (by which I mean, I have nothing about these people in my own research library).
I don't know how much you would want to hear from me, anyway. You won't like my answer. And my answer is, I don't buy the connection between ancient Egyptians and Serers. I know I'm arguing from ignorance in so far as the Serers are concerned, but my familiarity with ancient Africans in the northeast part of the continent leaves me confident of my conclusion.
The geographical constraints alone are prohibitive. At the end of the Neolithic Subpluvial in northeast Africa, people were caused to move to the only available water source: in this case, the Nile River. We cannot expect that large populations were going to trek across the entirety of arid North Africa in search of new homes and water sources, or vise versa: the end result would've been the death of practically everyone on the move. If there truly is some genetic link between the Serers and pharaonic Egyptians, it lies so many thousands of years in the past (meaning tens of thousands of years) as to make connections meaningless by the Chalcolithic or Early Bronze Age.
Ethnicity and language are other considerations. The two peoples were/are clearly different ethnic groups. The languages are even more diverse. I was able to clarify that the Serers speak a branch of the Niger-Congo language family, which is one of the largest in Africa but a completely different language from the extinct Afro-Semitic tongue spoken in pharaonic Egypt. This is critical to consider.
For example, in your OP I noticed that the word "Serer" is supposed to mean "he who traces the temples" in ancient Egyptian. I really don't know where that comes from but "Serer" is not even an ancient Egyptian word that I've been able to determine. The root
sr is common to many ancient Egyptian words, but none of them are involved with "Serer." To be honest I'm not sure what "traces" is supposed to mean in the definition you came across, but I suppose it infers some sort of physical delineation of a temple's outlines. If so, I can arrive at the actual ancient Egyptian equivalent:
a.f Hwt (pronounced something like "ahf hoot").
Hwt is one of numerous words for "temple" in ancient Egyptian, other examples of which include
Hwt-aAt, Hwt-nTr, aH, and
r-pr. In any case, in my own experience "he who traces the temples" is not an ancient Egyptian expression or phrase, anyway.
You included some links for my attention, so I'll attempt to be brief in my summaries of them.
First link: Nehebkau
I agree with your assessment. Nothing in this ancient word (name) contains a word for serpent. The "neheb" portion means "to bind" or "to bring together," while "kau" is the plural for
kA, one key aspect of the soul. This deity is tied in with creation myths but his key role became the harnessing or combining of the deceased's ba and ka after death. It's just that this deity was often depicted
as a serpent.
I think connected to your first link is the bit about "Amenti," in the next post (#11). You're right on two counts: I've explained the ancient Egyptian meaning of this word (many times, actually), and I'm not a fan of "word-juggling." Transliterated from the ancient Egyptian as
imntt, this was a basic word for "west" in one sense and, in a more ritual sense, a common means to refer to all deceased people ("the Westerners"). It designates the west side of the Nile, where most necropoli of importance were situated. The word, in so far as I'm aware, was
not used generically to refer to people who lived to the west of Egypt. There's really nothing to indicate in the Egyptian records that they were familiar with peoples living farther west than Libya, and when referring to Libyans the Egyptians tended to use either specific tribal designations (e.g., Libu, Meshwesh, Tjemeh) or their own collective word for Libyans: THnw (pronounced something like "Tchen-oo"). In other words, such people were not referred to as Imentet.
Second link: Set
I am largely in agreement with your assessment. The most important point of clarification is the current Egyptological consensus that the Set animal is not really a jackal alone so much as some sort of unidentified canid combined with aspects of other animals. This iconographical representation jibes very well with Set's nature of chaos and disorder.
I would not confuse Set with either Khentyimentu or Anubis. All three of these deities began their lives as separate and distinct gods in the pharaonic culture. The closest connection you can make is that all of them are southern in derivation: Khentyimentu and Anubis from Abydos and Set from the nearby polity of Naqada. All possess canid aspects, Khentyimentu and Anubis clearly being jackals, while Set appears to contain other aspects, as well.
Third link: Phoenicians and Serer trade
I'm not sure what to comment on with this one. With my lack of familiarity with the Serer culture I can make no authoritative remark about the origin of their script. I admit I'm dubious about it coming from the Phoenicians but cannot dismiss it outright. As for trade, I'd have to ask if there's definitive evidence for the material culture of Phoenicians in the archaeological record of the Serers? That's critical to answer.
You're correct that
Rmnn is an ancient Egyptian word for Lebanon (one of them, anyway). However, by all appearances, this was not native to the ancient Egyptian language, but an "Egyptianized" import-word from the Levant. The original as spoken in the Levant was the Semitic root
LBN. The oldest attestation of this word is on Mesopotamian tablets dating to around 2900 BCE.
Let me know if there is something else on which you'd like me to comment. That is, if you still want my input. I'm dubious about the whole thing, but if my participation is desired, I can pitch in. But now that I've typed this post and will submit it in a few seconds, I guess it means I'll be following the thread anyway.