as to the Thom thing, did I cite him as a reference?
or was that you....?
it was you wasn't it.
I merely pointed out you were wrong in your findings.
so trying to discredit someone you used as a source doesn't seem all that wise to me.
but we've been through this before, haven't we, on another thread, where you cited references, and I showed you the glaring holes in them, to which you tried the same immature deflection tactics as here.
maybe laver, if you can't face criticism of your posts, then public forums might not be your ideal medium.....
Oh dear !! Someone with a problem, methinks......