1881 replies to this topic

[HerNibs]

I think they should drop the Hi portion of the name.

Story Channel.

Nibs

[Black Hound]

I guess I fall into the "skepptic" camp. I am not goig to firmly say there were no ancient astronauts due to the facts, relics if you will, that does make one wonder and these can be debated as to exactly what they might or might not mean or even imply in apperance, shape, etc. I do wonder why "ancient astronauts" were here in the first place.? One could  debate about hem passing on advaanced info. in the fields of building, astronomy, even religious influences. I have read Von. Dan. books and he makes a good case for them being here but I guess it's me, I accept life beyond our little world, so I read whatever comes out about the possibilities of such visitations and just wonder.

[Qoais]

Graveyard, it's very hard to read all capitals in color.  I don't care that you use all caps, but the color is a killer.

[Abramelin]

Graveyard Hound, on 03 August 2010 - 01:40 PM, said:

I guess I fall into the "skepptic" camp. I am not goig to firmly say there were no ancient astronauts due to the facts, relics if you will, that does make one wonder and these can be debated as to exactly what they might or might not mean or even imply in apperance, shape, etc. I do wonder why "ancient astronauts" were here in the first place.? One could  debate about hem passing on advaanced info. in the fields of building, astronomy, even religious influences. I have read Von. Dan. books and he makes a good case for them being here but I guess it's me, I accept life beyond our little world, so I read whatever comes out about the possibilities of such visitations and just wonder.

If they had any reason to visit earth, it must have sighteeing, lol, simple curiosity.

And then mess around with genes, just to have a bit more fun. Maybe playing 'god' is fun too.

Hmm.. you say you fall into the sceptic camp, but then you say Von Daniken makes a 'good case'. Well, if you consider outright lying and fraud to be ways to make a good case...

[Oniomancer]

Qoais, on 03 August 2010 - 01:54 PM, said:

Graveyard, it's very hard to read all capitals in color.  I don't care that you use all caps, but the color is a killer.

It's not even in caps, it's in some horribly designed font that looks like it's all caps, with almost no spacing between words.

[WhiteMagicWoman]

Graveyard Hound, on 03 August 2010 - 01:40 PM, said:

I guess I fall into the "skepptic" camp. I am not goig to firmly say there were no ancient astronauts due to the facts, relics if you will, that does make one wonder and these can be debated as to exactly what they might or might not mean or even imply in apperance, shape, etc. I do wonder why "ancient astronauts" were here in the first place.? One could  debate about hem passing on advaanced info. in the fields of building, astronomy, even religious influences. I have read Von. Dan. books and he makes a good case for them being here but I guess it's me, I accept life beyond our little world, so I read whatever comes out about the possibilities of such visitations and just wonder.

I think I'm blind now...  

[Abramelin]

Well, the advantage is that it will still be hanging onto your retina minutes after you stopped looking at it, hahaha !!

[kmt_sesh]

Oniomancer, on 03 August 2010 - 04:03 PM, said:

It's not even in caps, it's in some horribly designed font that looks like it's all caps, with almost no spacing between words.

I think the font is called Impact. It's a display font, which means it's designed for headers or titles--but definitely not for body text. It's not at all a friendly font to read, and together with the blood-red color I feel like I'm being mugged.

Posters should stick with the default font and color. They're the easiest and kindest to read. Bold fonts and colors might be useful for paragraph headers or such, but the zanier a font looks, the less likely people will be to read the post.

[kmt_sesh]

Let's all post like this!

Oooo, pretty!

[TheSearcher]

kmt_sesh, on 03 August 2010 - 04:52 PM, said:

Let's all post like this!

Oooo, pretty!

You annoying man. That's just horrible!!

[zoser]

Abramelin, on 03 August 2010 - 01:55 PM, said:

If they had any reason to visit earth, it must have sighteeing, lol, simple curiosity.

And then mess around with genes, just to have a bit more fun. Maybe playing 'god' is fun too.

Hmm.. you say you fall into the sceptic camp, but then you say Von Daniken makes a 'good case'. Well, if you consider outright lying and fraud to be ways to make a good case...

I am not sure if this remark was random, but in actual fact Abe you are very close to the mark.  The visitors that came here approx 9000 years ago did indeed play God by messing around with Genetics. (Genesis = Genes of Isis).

This explains much about the current human condition, but in particular two points should be stressed:

1) It explains why there is a 'disconnect' between the pre-Egyptian advanced culture and the humans that came after (those of today).  Think:  We know nothing of their language, values, technology, religion.  This is explained by the view that if our genetics were altered, we would not have the translation capability and codings to understand what went on before.  Of course modern archaeology gets around this problem by saying that no intelligent race existed before the ancient Egyptians which is just about the biggest load of rubbish I have ever heard!

2) It explains why humans today know nothing of their purpose in the grand scheme of creation and why the human race seems to be'lost'; and indeed why the higher faculties and 90% of the brain are basically non-functioning.  Introducing faulty genetics into the human line would affect higher natural development and evolution.

These points if read carefully will reveal much to the genuine enquirer.  'Scientific' dissection and comparison with the high school history manual however will not.

There the matter stands.

Z

Edited by zoser, 04 August 2010 - 08:00 AM.

[SlimJim22]

zoser, on 04 August 2010 - 08:00 AM, said:

I am not sure if this remark was random, but in actual fact Abe you are very close to the mark.  The visitors that came here approx 9000 years ago did indeed play God by messing around with Genetics. (Genesis = Genes of Isis).

This explains much about the current human condition, but in particular two points should be stressed:

1) It explains why there is a 'disconnect' between the pre-Egyptian advanced culture and the humans that came after (those of today).  Think:  We know nothing of their language, values, technology, religion.  This is explained by the view that if our genetics were altered, we would not have the translation capability and codings to understand what went on before.  Of course modern archaeology gets around this problem by saying that no intelligent race existed before the ancient Egyptians which is just about the biggest load of rubbish I have ever heard!

2) It explains why humans today know nothing of their purpose in the grand scheme of creation and why the human race seems to be'lost'; and indeed why the higher faculties and 90% of the brain are basically non-functioning.  Introducing faulty genetics into the human line would affect higher natural development and evolution.

These points if read carefully will reveal much to the genuine enquirer.  'Scientific' dissection and comparison with the high school history manual however will not.

There the matter stands.

Z

I see no real disconnect as you mention. Can you be more specific? Civilizations rise and fall and knowledge is found and lost but this does not support AA theory in isolation.

As a 'genuine enquirer' and reading your post I find nothing revealing tbh. We know a lot more about egyptian culture and higher brain function than you appear to recognize. Please do not make such sweeping generalizations as concerns the 'human race' either. We are all different and explain our experiences from alternate perspectives but you seem to think you are in possesion of some knowledge that we are not.

I am intrigued to hear your theories and evidence of why you believe we were visited 9,000 years ago, I really am but from my own research I find a date of 9,000 years of little consequence. If we were 'seeded' in some way or other then it would have to have been earlier than that don't you think?

[TheSearcher]

zoser, on 04 August 2010 - 08:00 AM, said:

I am not sure if this remark was random, but in actual fact Abe you are very close to the mark.  The visitors that came here approx 9000 years ago did indeed play God by messing around with Genetics. (Genesis = Genes of Isis).

This explains much about the current human condition, but in particular two points should be stressed:

1) It explains why there is a 'disconnect' between the pre-Egyptian advanced culture and the humans that came after (those of today).  Think:  We know nothing of their language, values, technology, religion.  This is explained by the view that if our genetics were altered, we would not have the translation capability and codings to understand what went on before.  Of course modern archaeology gets around this problem by saying that no intelligent race existed before the ancient Egyptians which is just about the biggest load of rubbish I have ever heard!

2) It explains why humans today know nothing of their purpose in the grand scheme of creation and why the human race seems to be'lost'; and indeed why the higher faculties and 90% of the brain are basically non-functioning.  Introducing faulty genetics into the human line would affect higher natural development and evolution.

These points if read carefully will reveal much to the genuine enquirer.  'Scientific' dissection and comparison with the high school history manual however will not.

There the matter stands.

Z

A few things on point 1. Where exactly do you see a disconnect? We know plenty of their language, values, technology, religion. The fact that you don't know or seem to believe, this knowledge to amounts to nothing, is another problem entirely.
Where and how does modern archaeology get around this problem by saying that no intelligent race existed before the ancient Egyptians? Care to source and elaborate that, please? As far as I know archeology says no such thing.
....talking about rubbish....

Edit : typos

Edited by TheSearcher, 04 August 2010 - 09:34 AM.

[zoser]

Just a few things regarding the last 2 posts:

Archaelogy to my knowledge recognises no advanced civilisation prior to the what historians refer to as the Ancient Egyptians.  Please don't cite the Sumarians because that is not what I am referring to.  If you are aware of a recognised culture, then I would be more than fascinated to know and I would also be pleasantly surprised.

The evidence of an advanced pre Egyptian culture is not a matter of debate for me.  Advanced relics, worldwide folklore, and religious writings all allude to this.  The popular names that have given this credance are for example Von Daniken, Plato, Stitchen, Cayce, Hancock, Bauval, Gurdjeff, all from different times and places and with slightly different perspectives.

My information comes from another source not commonly known.  I don't exercise a monopoly on it, but at the same time I will only give it freely on the condition that it is treated with respect.  Think: if something is treasured, will you not exercise care with it?  I have alluded to this many times before on this forum, however to date no one has really asked genuinely about it and so I can only assume that no one really wants it.

Mr Searcher - how would you really feel if it was the case that I did know more than you about this subject?  Have you genuinely spent your life looking for rare, profound and special knowledge?  I have and diligently so.  So have others, since I am not the only one with this knowledge.  Finally ask yourself how open are you really to the proposition of new knowledge?  Are you satisfied with what you currently have, and what is easily available in the world?  If so then the matter rests there.  If not, then I remain open to your further enquiry.

Z

Edited by zoser, 04 August 2010 - 11:24 AM.

[Abramelin]

Of course, Zoser, I only made a joke.

But now you talk about some 'secret source' of information....

My guess: it's a spiritual souce... probably something to do with 'chanelling?