QUOTE(Jackdaw @ Nov 25 2004, 10:21 AM)
After one has visited any of the above mentioned sites and attempted to digest the tons of information re the case and the numerous suspects put forward etc etc ( Be mindful of the fact that the CASEBOOK forum considers itself to be an authority on the case---full of Ripperologists! ), please ask yourself any of the following questions.
1) Who knew the Whitechapel area like the back of his hand?
2) Who had art studios dotted in and around the area?
3) Who used prostitutes as models for his paintings?
4) Who purchased millitary uniforms?
5) Who had access to clothes/actors makeup for disguises?
6) Who dissappeared for days on end with no explanation?
7) Who was involved in the Royal Conspiracy?
8) Who was fluent in several languages?
9) Who was skilled in writing and drawing?
10) Who appeared to have a problem with his manhood?
There are many more questions to be asked, however the answers to the above may lead you to the identity of Jacky boy.

Jackdaw, i'm realy not trying to destroy your theory but i'm afraid I just don't buy it. It's great that there is still people like you showing an interest and putting forward more possible angles to the ripper case.
1)Thousands of people.
2)If you mean businesses and homes, again thousands of people.
3)Every painter of that era, they were cheap and in Victorian times very few other women would do it.
4)Don't see your point, Jack wasn't realy a confirmed military man.
5)Sickert probably, but few if any serial killers use disguises. When they kill they're in a state of frenzy, resembling an addiction. The last thing they're think about is putting on false moustaches.
6)After all these years I doubt no one can can positively know where anyone was at the time of the murders, even famous people. According to Sickert art experts he was in France at the time of some of the murders.
7)Sir William Gull, John Netley and Walter Sickert. The theory has been found to be nonsense.
8)Again, I don't see your point. The ripper was never stated to speak many languages.
9)Again, I don't see your point. Just because Sickert can paint doesn't mean he went around killing women.
10)Not me thankfully, and not Sickert either. He had mistresses and bore children, it seemed to work fine.