3292 replies to this topic

[flyingswan]

<p>

lightly, on 21 January 2013 - 01:14 PM, said:

can anyone come up with a photograph of ONE of the seats from the aircraft that struck the pentagon? I don't think i've ever seen ONE seat in any of the photographic evidence.
Maybe there have been and i missed them.

Some photos were released for the Moussaoui trial.  You could try googling those.

[preacherman76]

skyeagle409, on 22 January 2013 - 03:37 AM, said:

I guess 911 conspiracist forgot about the interviews with Osama bin Laden in southern Afghanistan during the 1990s.



I would like to ask Osama bin Laden what happened when he came face-to-face with American special forces, but unfortunately, he's dead.

Which OSBL?

[Babe Ruth]

ali smack, on 22 January 2013 - 01:15 AM, said:

Well living in the caves was just part of his plan to fool the west into thinking that's were he was hiding.
When he was found he was living in a big house, and apparently he kept moving from different houses.

And you know all this because you were his confidant?

No, you know all this because that's what the media has told you.  And now you can have that 'knowledge' reinforced by going to see Bigelow's Blunder.

[skyeagle409]

Babe Ruth, on 22 January 2013 - 02:48 PM, said:

No, you know all this because that's what the media has told you.

Well, you use references from 911 CT websites that are notorious for their brand of disinformation, misinformation and outright lies.

preacherman76, on 22 January 2013 - 01:07 PM, said:

Which OSBL?

The OBL currently lying beneath the waves.

[lightly]

Where are the jet's turbine engines  ?  Disintegrated? Evaporated?  ...  all i see is one hole in the building.  I would think the two massive engines might have left an ' impression '  on each side of THE hole in the middle?

[Babe Ruth]

lightly, on 23 January 2013 - 01:45 PM, said:

Where are the jet's turbine engines  ?  Disintegrated? Evaporated?  ...  all i see is one hole in the building.  I would think the two massive engines might have left an ' impression '  on each side of THE hole in the middle?

Good point!  Even moreso, where is the massive landing gear assemblies?

[skyeagle409]

Babe Ruth, on 23 January 2013 - 02:26 PM, said:

Good point!  Even moreso, where is the massive landing gear assemblies?

Edited by skyeagle409, 23 January 2013 - 03:45 PM.

[skyeagle409]

lightly, on 23 January 2013 - 01:45 PM, said:

Where are the jet's turbine engines  ?  Disintegrated? Evaporated?  ...  all i see is one hole in the building.  I would think the two massive engines might have left an ' impression '  on each side of THE hole in the middle?

[skyeagle409]

lightly, on 23 January 2013 - 01:45 PM, said:

Where are the jet's turbine engines  ?  Disintegrated? Evaporated?  ...  all i see is one hole in the building.  I would think the two massive engines might have left an ' impression '  on each side of THE hole in the middle?

Check out this photo where a B-25 struck the Empire State building. You do not see individual entry points of its two engines. Notice strike marks from the right wing on the wall.

[Babe Ruth]

Remember the F-18 video Sky?

Once bitten, twice shy.  Your tendency towards deceptive photos here has been established last year.

[skyeagle409]

Babe Ruth, on 23 January 2013 - 09:34 PM, said:

Remember the F-18 video Sky?

I sure do, so what is up with that? You say you were suckered, yet you continue to allow yourself to be suckered by 911 conspiracy websites.

Quote

Once bitten, twice shy.  Your tendency towards deceptive photos here has been established last year.

Considering that you continue to allow yourself to be suckered by 911 conspiracy websites, that is not saying much.

[Babe Ruth]

...and you were doing the trickery Sky, that I fell for.  

Once bitten, twice shy.

[skyeagle409]

Babe Ruth, on 23 January 2013 - 09:53 PM, said:

...and you were doing the trickery Sky, that I fell for.  

Once bitten, twice shy.

Well, you claimed that there were no Boeings involved in the attack on the Pentagon nor near Shanksville, which simply means you were suckered by those websites and you were suckered again when you threw in nukes in the attack on the WTC buildings. That was your fault for allowing yourself to be suckered by those 911 conspiracy websites.

Edited by skyeagle409, 23 January 2013 - 09:59 PM.

[lightly]

skyeagle409, on 23 January 2013 - 06:22 PM, said:

Check out this photo where a B-25 struck the Empire State building. You do not see individual entry points of its two engines. Notice strike marks from the right wing on the wall.

  Thanks for posting the photos skyeagle  ,   would you mind posting some of the Pentagon crash site....pre-cleanup ? The way the area looked shortly after the crash? I would just expect to see some sort of  evidence of IMPACT  where the engines   struck ?  But all we see is  one nice round hole  where the lighter nose   hit. It just seems odd to me.

As for the above photo.......

B-25 Mitchell Bomber >  b25_01.jpg   30.38K   0 downloads

It looks like the nose and both engines of a B-25 Mitchell might have fit in that hole?

Edited by lightly, 23 January 2013 - 10:57 PM.

[booNyzarC]

Babe Ruth, on 23 January 2013 - 09:34 PM, said:

Remember the F-18 video Sky?

Once bitten, twice shy.  Your tendency towards deceptive photos here has been established last year.

How many times are you going to bring up that complete BS BR?

How many times do I need to point out that the only Tom Foolery you fell victim to was your own?

You forget too quickly.  Perhaps someone needs to thwack you in the head to shake loose the cobwebs?



Shall I track down the links and repost them again for the umpteenth time showing how ridiculously unobservant you were?  Would you enjoy that?


Stop bringing up the F-18 video.  It is almost as old and tired as the rest of your BS.



***

Nice work skyeagle.  Good to see that you are still plugging away.  Consider me thoroughly impressed with the things you've been up to lately.  

Edited by booNyzarC, 24 January 2013 - 06:19 AM.