10148 replies to this topic

[theSOURCE]

zoser, on 03 February 2013 - 06:44 PM, said:

When are you going to demonstrate that?

No refutation of the granite resonance theory and no substantiation of the tomb theory.

I'm still waiting.  A lot of rhetoric and claims but no substance.

And I've never once needed to rely on foul language.

And most importantly, no substantiation of the AA claims either.

[zoser]

theSOURCE, on 03 February 2013 - 06:55 PM, said:

And most importantly, no substantiation of the AA claims either.

Au contraire.

Granite = quartz = piezo.   The vibration on a partially isolated granite structure caused it to resonate.  This as we well know causes stresses which excites the granite to produce high voltage.  It's all there.  

Of course tribal primitives just out of the stone age could not have conceived of this design let alone manufactured it so it had to be the work of visitors.

Loads of evidence.  However if you prefer to avoid it that's your divine choice.

Over to the skeptics.

Edited by zoser, 03 February 2013 - 07:01 PM.

[seeder]

zoser, on 03 February 2013 - 07:00 PM, said:

Au contraire.



Of course tribal primitives just out of the stone age could not have conceived of this design let alone manufactured it so it had to be the work of visitors.

There he goes again! so whats likely behind the door at machu picchu ? Answer a question before you swerve

[zoser]

seeder, on 03 February 2013 - 07:06 PM, said:

There he goes again! so whats likely behind the door at machu picchu ? Answer a question before you swerve

Interesting thought.  I've really no idea.  I do think looking at the evidence of MP that it is another classic example of later inferior work building on top of advanced precision.  Other than that and the fact that they obviously were trying to develop an isolated society away from the madening crowd down below I don't really have much of an interest in MP.

Edit to add:  It was settled first by visitors, then later as it was abandoned took over by the Inca.  Exactly in line with Cuzco and other Peruvian sites.

Interesting to see what my colleagues are whispering about though.  I should have some better idea this week.

Edited by zoser, 03 February 2013 - 07:24 PM.

[theSOURCE]

zoser, on 03 February 2013 - 07:00 PM, said:

Au contraire.

Granite = quartz = piezo.   The vibration on a partially isolated granite structure caused it to resonate.  This as we well know causes stresses which excites the granite to produce high voltage.  It's all there.  

Of course tribal primitives just out of the stone age could not have conceived of this design let alone manufactured it so it had to be the work of visitors.

Loads of evidence.  However if you prefer to avoid it that's your divine choice.

Over to the skeptics.

I've never heard a person rationalize so much just to make disconnected ideas fit into a personal fantasy as you. So far I've heard:

Lots of talk about large stones with smooth sides, pock marks and/or having a perfect geometric shape (which they don't).
Lots of talk of pyramids being used as generators, which is not only ludicrous but impractical as well.
Lots of talk about ancient and/or religious pictures depicting alien flying craft, which are actually religious symbolism.
And lots of talk about a carving supposedly showing a light bulb, which is in fact a symbolic picture of a plant (and BTW, if that is an alien's idea of a light bulb, then they must be the worst electrical designers in the universe).

And yet, no substantiation of aliens having been here in the past.

But of course I'm simply being "illogistical".

[zoser]

theSOURCE, on 03 February 2013 - 07:17 PM, said:

I've never heard a person rationalize so much just to make disconnected ideas fit into a personal fantasy as you. So far I've heard:

Lots of talk about large stones with smooth sides, pock marks and/or having a perfect geometric shape (which they don't).
Lots of talk of pyramids being used as generators, which is not only ludicrous but impractical as well.
Lots of talk about ancient and/or religious pictures depicting alien flying craft, which are actually religious symbolism.
And lots of talk about a carving supposedly showing a light bulb, which is in fact a symbolic picture of a plant (and BTW, if that is an alien's idea of a light bulb, then they must be the worst electrical designers in the universe).

And yet, no substantiation of aliens having been here in the past.

But of course I'm simply being "illogistical".

Logistical reasoning please not philosophy or rhetoric.

Edited by zoser, 03 February 2013 - 07:22 PM.

[DBunker]

zoser, on 03 February 2013 - 06:44 PM, said:

When are you going to demonstrate that?

No refutation of the granite resonance theory and no substantiation of the tomb theory.

I'm still waiting.  A lot of rhetoric and claims but no substance.

And I've never once needed to rely on foul language.

I have told you many times - You need the whole chain to work, you cant just point at one thing and say - See this one is still unexplained, so therefore ALIENZ.

Ever wonder why you need these logically flawed arguments to shoehorn your fantasy onto others?

Nothing you have claimed here stands up to scientific scrutiny..... the scientific method would shread it in a second.

There is a good reason why these type of paranormal claims never passes peer review..... Lets see if you can figure out what it is.

Edited by DBunker, 03 February 2013 - 07:23 PM.

[Soccergirl13]

Just wait until they find a granite stone behind the MP door and zooser will be all over it as the electricity generater of the whole city

[zoser]

Soccergirl13, on 03 February 2013 - 07:23 PM, said:

Just wait until they find a granite stone behind the MP door and zooser will be all over it as the electricity generater of the whole city

Another alternative theory researcher with some interesting ideas.

[theSOURCE]

zoser, on 03 February 2013 - 07:22 PM, said:

Logistical reasoning please not philosophy or rhetoric.

Something of substance to back up your claims please, not fantasy or delusions.

[zoser]

DBunker, on 03 February 2013 - 07:23 PM, said:

I have told you many times - You need the whole chain to work, you cant just point at one thing and say - See this one is still unexplained, so therefore ALIENZ.

Ever wonder why you need these logically flawed arguments to shoehorn your fantasy onto others?

Nothing you have claimed here stands up to scientific scrutiny..... the scientific method would shread it in a second.

There is a good reason why these type of paranormal claims never passes peer review..... Lets see if you can figure out what it is.

It stands up to scrutiny.  It doesn't however stand up to religious skeptics who act like the flat earth brigade.

I can live with that.

[Colonel Rhuairidh]

What is logistical reasoning, exactly?

[zoser]

theSOURCE, on 03 February 2013 - 07:28 PM, said:

Something of substance to back up your claims please, not fantasy or delusions.

It's here:

http://www.unexplain...9

Lord Vetinari, on 03 February 2013 - 07:29 PM, said:

What is logistical reasoning, exactly?

When things tie together to make a cohesive picture.

They don't with the tomb theory.  That's why it never caught on.

Edited by zoser, 03 February 2013 - 07:31 PM.

[DBunker]

zoser, on 03 February 2013 - 07:28 PM, said:

It stands up to scrutiny.  It doesn't however stand up to religious skeptics who act like the flat earth brigade.

I can live with that.

Ok then.... Im waiting for you to post a link that proves where this theory of yours passed peer review..... No more song and dance - its time to put up or shut up.

Edited by DBunker, 03 February 2013 - 07:34 PM.

[zoser]

DBunker, on 03 February 2013 - 07:33 PM, said:

Ok then.... Im waiting for you to post a link that proves where this theory of yours passed peer review..... No more song and dance - its time to put up or shut up.

http://www.unexplain...8