in reference to the bolded part. you just described the IPCC. http://www.unexplain...howtopic=174216
opinion passed off as science and bureaucrats masquerading as scientists. yup. that's a fair description of the exact organisation you AGWers follow like dogs...
notice the distinct lack of anyone like mattshark in either that thread or the himalayan glacier one... ask yourself why that is.
You know I have to say I am not buying the story so much as man made so ya I agree with the claim man is not the cause. To me it just doesn't add up and to invest in this idea as a whole is somewhat silly. However we are not helping so recycle and don't buy gas pigs, or fart as much.
I still say when someone makes a claim against another member they better back it up or retract it as was done to Matt. Thats only fair as if any of us get called out on something I want to know for what.