zoser, on 04 August 2010 - 11:22 AM, said:
Just a few things regarding the last 2 posts:
Archaelogy to my knowledge recognises no advanced civilisation prior to the what historians refer to as the Ancient Egyptians. Please don't cite the Sumarians because that is not what I am referring to. If you are aware of a recognised culture, then I would be more than fascinated to know and I would also be pleasantly surprised.
The evidence of an advanced pre Egyptian culture is not a matter of debate for me. Advanced relics, worldwide folklore, and religious writings all allude to this. The popular names that have given this credance are for example Von Daniken, Plato, Stitchen, Cayce, Hancock, Bauval, Gurdjeff, all from different times and places and with slightly different perspectives.
My information comes from another source not commonly known. I don't exercise a monopoly on it, but at the same time I will only give it freely on the condition that it is treated with respect. Think: if something is treasured, will you not exercise care with it? I have alluded to this many times before on this forum, however to date no one has really asked genuinely about it and so I can only assume that no one really wants it.
Mr Searcher - how would you really feel if it was the case that I did know more than you about this subject? Have you genuinely spent your life looking for rare, profound and special knowledge? I have and diligently so. So have others, since I am not the only one with this knowledge. Finally ask yourself how open are you really to the proposition of new knowledge? Are you satisfied with what you currently have, and what is easily available in the world? If so then the matter rests there. If not, then I remain open to your further enquiry.
Z
zoser, on 05 August 2010 - 08:00 AM, said:
'Advanced' can only really mean one thing and that is in terms of the ability to manipulate forces, energy and matter in ways that we today would not readily understand. Part of the reason that we have lost this technology is described in my last but one post.
What concerns me is when people show more interest in arguing a point and being defensive about their own position rather than being genuine about seeking new knowledge. You see I have always come from the latter position, as I have always been skeptical about how information concerning the deep and important things in life are presented to us. Basically I have never been satisfied with it.
Try and understand that a specific kind of mentality persists here; namely that anything that presents itself as different immediately gets subject to the abrasiveness of University style argument. I don't really want any part of that. This is not the fault of the people on this forum; it's how modern life brings us up and trains us. If you at least appreciate what I am saying here it would be very useful indeed and a good starting point.
I have no desire to with hold anything since I do not own what I have been given. It's just that I can only dispense it under the right circumstances to people with the correct attitude.
I didn't mean to single you out Jim and Mr Searcher and I do know you to be nice people with a good sense of enquiry and interest. Mr KMT included. You have to recognise however that we have all been a victim of 20th Century education and that has not really equipped us for tackling the really important questions in life.
So unless there is a willingness to be more open to new views, all I can really do is what I have been doing, and that is to pop in from time to time and offer small snippets of what I have to see if it resonates with anyone. I will leave it there for now.
See you all soon.
Z
3
