Jump to content




Welcome to Unexplained Mysteries! Please sign in or create an account to start posting and to access a host of extra features.


- - - - -

Chronological order of the bible


  • Please log in to reply
166 replies to this topic

#31    Mr Walker

Mr Walker

    Forum Divinity

  • Member
  • 15,648 posts
  • Joined:09 Nov 2005
  • Gender:Not Selected
  • Location:Australia

  • Sometimes the Phantom leaves the jungle, and walks the streets of the city like an ordinary man.

Posted 06 July 2013 - 03:38 AM

View PostFrank Merton, on 06 July 2013 - 12:24 AM, said:

If she would spend that amount of time reading great literature and its commentaries she would be well educated.

While my wife left school at 15 to begin work, she is as well read as I am. Probably  like me, she has read at least a million words per week, from books magazines etc. for fifty years. Her vocabulary is as extensive (ie we know most of the words in the oxford dictionary for example) as mine, and her knolwedge of things is as good as mine inmany areas.

It is not one or the other you realise It only takes her  about 15 minutes perday to read enough of the bible to complete it in a year and another 15 minutes or so to study what she has read, cross reference it and gain an understanding of any bits she doesn't understandread

Also, anyone who has NOT read the bible has not read the greatest  example of human literature (By most measurements) It includes all forms of english writing, and devices, and in general its grammar syntax, construction, etc is far superior to most books.

  We have both read all the "major great works of mankind" in english,  from literature like cervantes, the brontes, swift, dumas melville, carrol, trollope, dickens, wordsworth,  elliot, james, twain,  dostoevsky, keats, tolstoy  stevenson wilde  jack london and "modern" writers;  such as conrad, buchan,joyce, woolfe, forster, lawrence, fitzgerald kafka and hemingway; histories such as "the decline and fall of the roman empire" for example, plus a lot of other historical and autobiographical material.
We had a personal library of over 10000 books including some over 200 years old it would be difficult for you to name a writer writing in english which we ahve not read. We have both also read thousands of really modern novels and other literature. I have read 10 this week including 3 last week end.

You are a child of the universe, no less than the trees and the stars; you have a right to be here. And whether or not it is clear to you, no doubt the universe is unfolding as it should.

Therefore be at peace with God, whatever you conceive Him to be, and whatever your labors and aspirations, in the noisy confusion of life keep peace with your soul.

With all its sham, drudgery and broken dreams, it is still a beautiful world..

Be cheerful.

Strive to be happy.

#32    fullywired

fullywired

    Government Agent

  • Member
  • 4,116 posts
  • Joined:16 Apr 2007
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:UK

Posted 06 July 2013 - 04:25 PM

View PostMr Walker, on 06 July 2013 - 03:38 AM, said:

While my wife left school at 15 to begin work, she is as well read as I am. Probably  like me, she has read at least a million words per week, from books magazines etc. for fifty years. Her vocabulary is as extensive (ie we know most of the words in the oxford dictionary for example) as mine, and her knolwedge of things is as good as mine inmany areas.

It is not one or the other you realise It only takes her  about 15 minutes perday to read enough of the bible to complete it in a year and another 15 minutes or so to study what she has read, cross reference it and gain an understanding of any bits she doesn't understandread

Also, anyone who has NOT read the bible has not read the greatest  example of human literature (By most measurements) It includes all forms of english writing, and devices, and in general its grammar syntax, construction, etc is far superior to most books.

  We have both read all the "major great works of mankind" in english,  from literature like cervantes, the brontes, swift, dumas melville, carrol, trollope, dickens, wordsworth,  elliot, james, twain,  dostoevsky, keats, tolstoy  stevenson wilde  jack london and "modern" writers;  such as conrad, buchan,joyce, woolfe, forster, lawrence, fitzgerald kafka and hemingway; histories such as "the decline and fall of the roman empire" for example, plus a lot of other historical and autobiographical material.
We had a personal library of over 10000 books including some over 200 years old it would be difficult for you to name a writer writing in english which we ahve not read. We have both also read thousands of really modern novels and other literature. I have read 10 this week including 3 last week end.


WOW!!!!!!!
:w00t: :w00t: :w00t: :w00t: :w00t:

Words fail me

  fullywired :cry:

Posted Image  



"Believe nothing, no matter where you read it, or who said it, no matter if I have said it, unless it agrees with your own reason and your own common sense."
-------Buddha (563 - 483 BC)

#33    Rlyeh

Rlyeh

    Omnipotent Entity

  • Member
  • 9,168 posts
  • Joined:01 Jan 2011
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:The sixth circle

  • Build a man a fire, and he'll be warm for a day. Set a man on fire, and he'll be warm for the rest of his life. - Terry Pratchett

Posted 06 July 2013 - 05:07 PM

View PostMr Walker, on 06 July 2013 - 03:38 AM, said:

While my wife left school at 15 to begin work, she is as well read as I am. Probably  like me, she has read at least a million words per week, from books magazines etc. for fifty years. Her vocabulary is as extensive (ie we know most of the words in the oxford dictionary for example) as mine, and her knolwedge of things is as good as mine inmany areas.

It is not one or the other you realise It only takes her  about 15 minutes perday to read enough of the bible to complete it in a year and another 15 minutes or so to study what she has read, cross reference it and gain an understanding of any bits she doesn't understandread

Also, anyone who has NOT read the bible has not read the greatest  example of human literature (By most measurements) It includes all forms of english writing, and devices, and in general its grammar syntax, construction, etc is far superior to most books.
This the same wife who is creationist? Bet it doesn't stand up to a good science book.


#34    Doug1o29

Doug1o29

    Majestic 12 Operative

  • Member
  • 6,479 posts
  • Joined:01 Aug 2007
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:oklahoma

Posted 06 July 2013 - 06:45 PM

View PostImaginarynumber1, on 05 July 2013 - 02:34 AM, said:

Are you implying that the exodus out of Egypt actually took place, or just some of the historical information in exodus is accurate?
"The Exodus" actually happened; though, it was a lot more complicated than the Bible story.  It is, basically, the story of the Hyksos expulsion with events from 450 years and the reigns of 42 Pharaohs all rolled into one story.  Moses prototypes include Pharaoh Ahmose I, a courtier of Queen Hatshepsut named Djehuty, the leader of a slave revolt named Osar-Seph and the Pharaoh Amenmeses.  Each contributed part of the story.

"The Exodus" was at least three separate events.  The death of Queen Hatshepsut precipitated a sudden change in administration which necessitated Djehuty's hasty departure for Canaan where he lived with some shepherds.  Eventually he patched things up with Thutmose III and returned to Egypt.  That's the "prince of Egypt" part of the story.

The Amarna Period roughly corresponds to the sojourn.  The "Pharaoh who knew not Joseph" was Horemheb - the "Pharaoh of the Oppression."  The "Pharaoh of the Exodus" was Ramses I.  But he was only on the throne fourteen months.  The confrontation between Osar-Seph and Seti (then heir apparent) occurred at about the end of Horemheb's reign and carried over into that of Ramses I.  Part of the Exodus story occurred contemporaneously with Ramses' death.

At the end of the slave revolt, a group of "Shosu," apparently not wanting to hang around to meet Seti's three armies, escaped into the desert, probably heading southeast to Sinai.  Evidently some of them escaped Seti's armies because we have their story in the Bible.  Seti only refers to them as "troublesome Shosu" - a derogatory term for Semites, and uses the event as an excuse to invade Canaan.

Amenmeses was a grandson of Ramses II (the son of Seti I) and son of Merneptah.  He was the general in charge of Thebes which he ruled as a separate kingdom; although, he still maintained allegiance to Merneptah.  When Merneptah died, Amenmeses took advantage of being a general with an army and declared himself Pharoah.  The "legitimate" Pharaoh (Seti II) got the other princes to back him and descended on Thebes with his own army.  Amenmeses simply vanished, but under circumstances that make one wonder - there was a convenient escape route leading from Thebes through Wadi Hammamat to Quft.  From Quft, one could sail directly across the Red Sea to the copper workings at Serabit al Khaddim.  Twenty-one years after Amenmeses vanished, the Pelest invaded Egypt and threatened the copper mines in Sinai.  Ramses III sent a military expedition to Sinai to work the mines and protect the workings from the Pelest.  In the lead was a man with military experience who knew his way around Sinai and the copper mines.

The Egyptain navy, never noted for military prowess, managed to corner the Pelest fleet in a channel of the Nile where both ship-based and shore-based archers could rain arrows on them.  The Egyptians then settled the Pelest in Palestine to serve Egyptian interests where they became the Palestinians.  Peace returned to Sinai and for forty years (1187 to 1147 BC) the Egyptians worked the mines with help from both Egypt and Canaan.  In 1147, Ramses VI withdrew financial support for both the garrison in Palestine and the mines in Sinai, leaving a lot of unemployed miners to fend for themselves.  Most just went home to Canaan, but a few who were natives of Sinai and/or Egyptians with no place to go home to, became bandits (aka "habiru").

That's the story in a nutshell.
Doug

Edited by Doug1o29, 06 July 2013 - 07:11 PM.

If I have seen farther than other men, it is because I stood on the shoulders of giants. --Bernard de Chartres
The beginning of knowledge is the realization that one doesn't and cannot know everything.
Science is the father of knowledge, but opinion breeds ignorance. --Hippocrates
Ignorance is not an opinion. --Adam Scott

#35    Doug1o29

Doug1o29

    Majestic 12 Operative

  • Member
  • 6,479 posts
  • Joined:01 Aug 2007
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:oklahoma

Posted 06 July 2013 - 07:28 PM

View PostGIDEON MAGE, on 05 July 2013 - 06:18 PM, said:

The Slaughter of the Innocents, like Matthew's Zombies, the eclipse at the crucifiction, and the  earthquakes, are all imaginary episodes inserted by the fourth century compilers of the new testament.  Why would Satan post a star to lead Herod to stage a non-existent Slaughter of the Innocents?  How would John the Baptist have escaped?  There is so very little truth or accuracy in the New Testament.  It was put together as a drastic attempt to reunite the Roman Empire under one manditory Religion.  Thousands were slaughtered for not adhering to the new state-sponsored faith, and the Empire fell apart again after the death of Theodosius.  Haven't any of you seen the movie "Agora"?
A solar eclipse actually occurred on March 22, 33 AD.  You can look that up in an ephermis.  In Jerusalem it was a partial eclipse with the upper limb of the sun visible throughout.  That was on Friday, two weeks before Passover, so the story is a little garbled, but still recognizable.  Obviously, not written by an eyewitness.

The Innocents and the Zombies:  Josephus and Tacitus, who wrote about everything under the sun, never mentioned either.  Nor is there confirmation from any other ancient writer who could possibly have seen the events.  They didn't happen.

BUT:  the slaughter of the innocents gives the Jesus story a poetic symmetry with the story of Moses.  There may actually have been such a slaughter during the Second Intermediate Period - a Hyksos Pharaoh slaughtering his own people for we know not what reason.  But the slaughter associated with Jesus is just a story-telling device, invented for the sake of the story and not for the sake of history.
Doug

If I have seen farther than other men, it is because I stood on the shoulders of giants. --Bernard de Chartres
The beginning of knowledge is the realization that one doesn't and cannot know everything.
Science is the father of knowledge, but opinion breeds ignorance. --Hippocrates
Ignorance is not an opinion. --Adam Scott

#36    Doug1o29

Doug1o29

    Majestic 12 Operative

  • Member
  • 6,479 posts
  • Joined:01 Aug 2007
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:oklahoma

Posted 06 July 2013 - 08:11 PM

View PostJor-el, on 04 July 2013 - 08:32 PM, said:

However, it seems that Irenaeus in 150 A.D., and also Hypolytus in the 2nd century, each quote from these disputed verses, so the documentary evidence is that they were deleted later in the Alexandrian texts, not added subsequently.
If memory serves:  the first historical evidence of Irenaeus is from 177 when he was selected for a trip to Rome to consult with church authorities there on the subject of heresies.  When he returned in 178, the bishop and several others had been executed.  He succeeded to the bishop's office.  When Marcus Aurelius died, his successor, Commodus, discontinued the persecutions, giving Irenaeus time to write "Against Heresies."   Most authorities list "c. 180 AD" as the date for Irenaeus.

With all due respect to your sources, a lot of what is claimed as quotes from the gospels, is distinctly NOT from the gospels.

Cassels argues that Tatian's Diatessaron may have been taken from the Gospel of the Hebrews.  Whether he proves his point or not is a matter of opinion, but it does throw doubt on the traditional gospels as sources.
Doug

If I have seen farther than other men, it is because I stood on the shoulders of giants. --Bernard de Chartres
The beginning of knowledge is the realization that one doesn't and cannot know everything.
Science is the father of knowledge, but opinion breeds ignorance. --Hippocrates
Ignorance is not an opinion. --Adam Scott

#37    Jor-el

Jor-el

    Knight of the Most High God

  • Member
  • 7,789 posts
  • Joined:12 Oct 2006
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:Portugal

  • We are the sum of all that is, and has been. We will be the sum of our choices.

Posted 06 July 2013 - 09:19 PM

View PostDoug1o29, on 06 July 2013 - 08:11 PM, said:

If memory serves:  the first historical evidence of Irenaeus is from 177 when he was selected for a trip to Rome to consult with church authorities there on the subject of heresies.  When he returned in 178, the bishop and several others had been executed.  He succeeded to the bishop's office.  When Marcus Aurelius died, his successor, Commodus, discontinued the persecutions, giving Irenaeus time to write "Against Heresies."   Most authorities list "c. 180 AD" as the date for Irenaeus.

With all due respect to your sources, a lot of what is claimed as quotes from the gospels, is distinctly NOT from the gospels.

Cassels argues that Tatian's Diatessaron may have been taken from the Gospel of the Hebrews.  Whether he proves his point or not is a matter of opinion, but it does throw doubt on the traditional gospels as sources.
Doug

I must indeed disagree since the quote is verbatim and exists long before the Alexandrian manuscripts redacted the book of Mark to fit their beliefs which do not hold the resurrection of the body of Jesus.

It is a nice excuse for a few people to try and discredit the book of Mark, but it is founded on a principle of misdirection.

Against Heresies, Book 3, Chapter 10 - PROOFS OF THE FOREGOING, DRAWN FROM THE GOSPELS OF MARK AND LUKE.

1. Luke also, the follower and disciple of the apostles, referring to Zacharias and Elisabeth, from whom, according to promise, John was born, says: "And they were both righteous before God, walking in all the commandments and ordinances of the Lord blameless."(13) And again, speaking of Zacharias: "And it came to pass, that while he executed the priest's office before God in the order of his course, according to the custom of the priest's office, his lot was to burn incense; "(14) and he came to sacrifice, "entering into the temple of the Lord."(15) Whose angel Gabriel, also, who stands prominently in the presence of the Lord, simply, absolutely, and decidedly confessed in his own person as God and Lord, Him who had chosen Jerusalem, and had instituted the sacerdotal office. For he knew of none other above Him; since, if he had been in possession of the knowledge of any other more perfect God and Lord besides Him, he surely would never -- as I have already shown -- have confessed Him, whom he knew to be the fruit of a defect, as absolutely and altogether God and Lord. And then, speaking of John, he thus says: "For he shall be great in the sight of the Lord, and many of the children of Israel shall he turn to the Lord their God. And he shall go before Him in the spirit and power of Elias, to make ready a people prepared for the Lord."(16) For whom, then, did he prepare the people, and in the sight of what Lord was he made great? Truly of Him who said that John had something even "more than a prophet,"(17) and that "among those born of women none is greater than John the Baptist;" who did also make the people ready for the Lord's advent, warning his fellow-servants, and preaching to them repentance, that they might receive remission from the Lord when He should be present, having been convened to Him, from whom they had been alienated because of sins and transgressions. As also David says, "The alienated are sinners from the womb: they go astray as soon as they are born."(1) And it was on account of this that he, turning them to their Lord, prepared, in the spirit and power of Elias, a perfect people for the Lord.

2. And again, speaking in reference to the angel, he says: "But at that time the angel Gabriel was sent from God, who did also say to the virgin, Fear not, Mary; for thou hast found favour with God."(2) And he says concerning the Lord: "He shall be great, and shall be called the Son of the Highest: and the Lord God shall give unto Him the throne of His father David: and He shall reign over the house of Jacob for ever; and of His kingdom there shall be no end."(3) For who else is there who can reign uninterruptedly over the house of Jacob for ever, except Jesus Christ our Lord, the Son of the Most High God, who promised by the law and the prophets that He would make His salvation visible to all flesh; so that He would become the Son of man for this purpose, that man also might become the son of God? And Mary, exulting because of this, cried out, prophesying on behalf of the Church, "My soul doth magnify the Lord, and my spirit hath rejoiced in God my Saviour. For He hath taken up His child Israel, in remembrance of His mercy, as He spake to our fathers, Abraham, and his seed for ever."(4) By these and such like [passages] the Gospel points out that it was God who spake to the fathers; that it was He who, by Moses, instituted the legal dispensation, by which giving of the law we know that He spake to the fathers. This same God,. after His great goodness, poured His compassion upon us, through which compassion "the Day-spring from on high hath looked upon us, and appeared to those who sat in darkness and the shadow of death, and has guided our feet into the way of peace;"(5) as Zacharias also, recovering from the state of dumbness which he had suffered on account of unbelief, having been filled with a new spirit, did bless God in a new manner. For all things had entered upon a new phase, the Word arranging after a new manner the advent in the flesh, that He might win back(6) to God that human nature (hominem) which had departed from God; and therefore men were taught to worship God after a new fashion, but not another god, because in truth there is but "one God, who justifieth the circumcision by faith, and the uncircumcision through faith."(7) But Zacharias prophesying, exclaimed, "Blessed be the Lord God of Israel; for He hath visited and redeemed His people, and hath raised up an horn of salvation for us in the house of His servant David; as He spake by the mouth of His holy prophets, which have been since the world begun; salvation from our enemies, and from the hand of all that hate us; to perform the mercy [promised] to our fathers, and to remember His holy covenant, the oath which He sware to our father Abraham, that He would grant unto us, that we, being delivered out of the hand of our enemies, might serve Him without fear, in holiness and righteousness before Him, all our days."(8) Then he says to John: "And thou, child, shalt be called the prophet of the Highest: for thou shalt go before the face of the Lord to prepare HiS ways; to give knowledge of salvation to His people, for the remission of their sins."(9) For this is the knowledge of salvation which was wanting to them, that of the Son of God, which John made known, saying, "Behold the Lamb of God, who taketh away the sin of the world. This is He of whom I said, After me cometh a man who was made before me;(10) because He was prior to me: and of His fulness have all we received."(11) This, therefore, was the knowledge of salvation; but [it did not consist in] another God, nor another Father, nor Bythus, nor the Pleroma of thirty Aeons, nor the Mother of the (lower) Ogdoad: but the knowledge of salvation was the knowledge of the Son of God, who is both called and actually is, salvation, and Saviour, and salutary. Salvation, indeed, as follows: "I have waited for Thy salvation, O Lord."(12) And then again, Saviour: "Behold my God, my Saviour, I will put my trust in Him."(13) But as bringing salvation, thus: "God hath made known His salvation (salutare) in the sight of the heathen."(14) For He is indeed Saviour, as being the Son and Word of God; but salutary, since [He is] Spirit; for he says: "The Spirit of our countenance, Christ the Lord."(15) But salvation, as being flesh: for "the Word was made flesh, and dwelt among us."(16) This knowledge of salvation, therefore, John did impart to those repenting, and believing in the Lamb of God, who taketh away the sin of the world.

3. And the angel of the Lord, he says, appeared to the shepherds, proclaiming joy to them: "For(1) there is born in the house of David, a Saviour, which is Christ the Lord. Then [appeared] a multitude of the heavenly host, praising God, and saying, Glory in the highest to God, and on earth peace, to men of good will." (2) The falsely-called Gnostics say that these angels came from the Ogdoad, and made manifest the descent of the superior Christ. But they are again in error, when saying that the Christ and Saviour from above was not born, but that also, after the baptism of the dispensational Jesus, he, [the Christ of the Pleroma,] descended upon him as a dove. Therefore, according to these men, the angels of the Ogdoad lied, when they said, "For unto you is born this day a Saviour, who is Christ the Lord, in the city of David." For neither was Christ nor the Saviour born at that time, by their account; but it was he, the dispensational Jesus, who is of the framer of the world, the [Demiurge], and upon whom, after his baptism, that is, after [the lapse of] thirty years, they maintain the Saviour from above descended. But why did [the angels] add, "in the city of David," if they did not proclaim the glad tidings of the fulfilment of God's promise made to David, that from the fruit of his body there should be an eternal King? For the Framer [Demiurge] of the entire universe made promise to David, as David himself declares: "My help is from God, who made heaven and earth;"(3) and again: "In His hand are the ends of the earth, and the heights of the mountains are His. For the sea is His, and He did Himself make it; and His hands founded the dry land. Come ye, let us worship and fall down before Him, and weep in the presence of the Lord who made us; for He is the Lord our God."(4) The Holy Spirit evidently thus declares by David to those hearing him, that there shall be those who despise Him who formed us, and who is God alone. Wherefore he also uttered the foregoing words, meaning to say: See that ye do not err; besides or above Him there is no other God, to whom ye should rather stretch out [your hands], thus rendering us pious and grateful towards Him who made, established, and [still] nourishes us. What, then, shall happen to those who have been the authors of so much blasphemy against their Creator ? This identical truth was also what the angels [proclaimed]. For when they exclaim, "Glory to God in the highest, and in earth peace," they have glorified with these. words Him who is the Creator of the highest, that is, of super-celestial things, and the Founder of everything on earth: who has sent to His own handiwork, that is, to men, the blessing of His salvation from heaven. Wherefore he adds: "The shepherds returned, glorifying God for all which they had heard and seen, as it was told unto them."(5) For the Israelitish shepherds did not glorify another god, but Him who had been announced by the law and the prophets, the Maker of all things, whom also the angels glorified. But if the angels who were from the Ogdoad were accustomed to glorify any other, different from Him whom the shepherds [adored], these angels from the Ogdoad brought to them error and not truth.

4. And still further does Luke say in reference to the Lord: "When the days of purification were accomplished, they brought Him up to Jerusalem, to present Him before the Lord, as it is written in the law of the Lord, That every male opening the womb shall be called holy to the Lord; and that they should offer a sacrifice, as it is said in the law of the Lord, a pair of turtle-doves, or two young pigeons:"(6) in his own person most clearly calling Him Lord, who appointed the legal dispensation. But "Simeon," he also says, "blessed God, and said, Lord, now lettest Thou Thy servant depart in peace; for mine eyes have seen Thy salvation, which Thou hast prepared before the face of all people; a light for the revelation of the Gentiles, and the glory of Thy people Israel."(7) And "Anna"(8) also, "the prophetess," he says, in like manner glorified God when she saw Christ, "and spake of Him to all them who were looking for the redemption of Jerusalem."(9) Now by all these one God is shown forth, revealing to men the new dispensation of liberty, the covenant, through the new advent of His Son.

5. Wherefore also Mark, the interpreter and follower of Peter, does thus commence his Gospel narrative: "The beginning of the Gospel of Jesus Christ, the Son of God; as it is written in the prophets, Behold, I send My messenger before Thy face, which shall prepare Thy way.(10) The voice of one crying in the wilderness, Prepare ye the way of the Lord, make the paths straight before our God." Plainly does the commencement of the Gospel quote the words of the holy prophets, and point out Him at once, whom they confessed as God and Lord; Him, the Father of our Lord Jesus Christ, who had also made promise to Him, that He would send His messenger before His face, who was John, crying in the wilderness, in "the spirit and power of Elias,"(1)"Prepare ye the way of me Lord, make straight paths before our God." For the prophets did not announce one and mother God, but one and the same; under rations aspects, however, and many titles. For varied and rich in attribute is the Father, as I have already shown in the book preceding(2) this; and I shall show [the same truth] from the prophets themselves in the further course of this work. Also, towards the conclusion of his Gospel, Mark says: "So then, after the Lord Jesus had spoken to them, He was received up into heaven, and sitteth on the right hand of God; "(3) confirming what had been spoken by the prophet: "The LORD said to my Lord, Sit Thou on My right hand, until I make Thy foes Thy footstool."(4) Thus God and the Father are truly one and the same; He who was announced by the prophets, and handed down by the true Gospel; whom we Christians worship and love with the whole heart, as the Maker of heaven and earth, and of all things therein.


This testimony from Irenaeus  should not be ignored. Irenaeus was a disciple of Polycarp who, in turn, was a disciple of the apostle John,

Irenaeus, who had moved out from Asia Minor to Lyons, France, by 177 C.E., was a bold defender of the Christian gospel as taught by the apostle John. He was also a bold defender of the Holy Scriptures.

Irenaeus records that a disputed reading of Revelation 13:18 had been settled by examining "all the most approved and ancient copies" and by consulting men who had personally spoken about the disputed reading with the apostle John in Ephesus.

Irenaeus, wrote: "Marcion and his followers have betaken themselves to mutilating the Scriptures, not acknowledging some books at all, and curtailing the gospel according to Luke and the Epistles of Paul, they assert that these alone are authentic which they themselves have shortened." ( Irenaeus, Against Heresies, Book III, Chapter XII.-Doctrine of the Rest of the Apostles. Section 12)

Likewise Tertullian (about AD 208) is on record challenging Alexandrian Gnostic heretics to examine the original writings of the apostles and specifically states that they were still available for examination in such places as Corinth, Philippi, Thessalonica, and Ephesus, etc.

So what we have is some people who are gnostics, who came up with a way to discredit the last chapter of Mark, not the other way around.

Posted Image


"Man is not the centre. God does not exist for the sake of man. Man does not exist for his own sake."

-C. S. Lewis


#38    Imaginarynumber1

Imaginarynumber1

    I am not an irrational number

  • Member
  • 4,836 posts
  • Joined:22 Mar 2010
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:Ohio

Posted 06 July 2013 - 11:13 PM

View PostDoug1o29, on 06 July 2013 - 06:45 PM, said:

"The Exodus" actually happened; though, it was a lot more complicated than the Bible story.  It is, basically, the story of the Hyksos expulsion with events from 450 years and the reigns of 42 Pharaohs all rolled into one story.  Moses prototypes include Pharaoh Ahmose I, a courtier of Queen Hatshepsut named Djehuty, the leader of a slave revolt named Osar-Seph and the Pharaoh Amenmeses.  Each contributed part of the story.

"The Exodus" was at least three separate events.  The death of Queen Hatshepsut precipitated a sudden change in administration which necessitated Djehuty's hasty departure for Canaan where he lived with some shepherds.  Eventually he patched things up with Thutmose III and returned to Egypt.  That's the "prince of Egypt" part of the story.

The Amarna Period roughly corresponds to the sojourn.  The "Pharaoh who knew not Joseph" was Horemheb - the "Pharaoh of the Oppression."  The "Pharaoh of the Exodus" was Ramses I.  But he was only on the throne fourteen months.  The confrontation between Osar-Seph and Seti (then heir apparent) occurred at about the end of Horemheb's reign and carried over into that of Ramses I.  Part of the Exodus story occurred contemporaneously with Ramses' death.

At the end of the slave revolt, a group of "Shosu," apparently not wanting to hang around to meet Seti's three armies, escaped into the desert, probably heading southeast to Sinai.  Evidently some of them escaped Seti's armies because we have their story in the Bible.  Seti only refers to them as "troublesome Shosu" - a derogatory term for Semites, and uses the event as an excuse to invade Canaan.

Amenmeses was a grandson of Ramses II (the son of Seti I) and son of Merneptah.  He was the general in charge of Thebes which he ruled as a separate kingdom; although, he still maintained allegiance to Merneptah.  When Merneptah died, Amenmeses took advantage of being a general with an army and declared himself Pharoah.  The "legitimate" Pharaoh (Seti II) got the other princes to back him and descended on Thebes with his own army.  Amenmeses simply vanished, but under circumstances that make one wonder - there was a convenient escape route leading from Thebes through Wadi Hammamat to Quft.  From Quft, one could sail directly across the Red Sea to the copper workings at Serabit al Khaddim.  Twenty-one years after Amenmeses vanished, the Pelest invaded Egypt and threatened the copper mines in Sinai.  Ramses III sent a military expedition to Sinai to work the mines and protect the workings from the Pelest.  In the lead was a man with military experience who knew his way around Sinai and the copper mines.

The Egyptain navy, never noted for military prowess, managed to corner the Pelest fleet in a channel of the Nile where both ship-based and shore-based archers could rain arrows on them.  The Egyptians then settled the Pelest in Palestine to serve Egyptian interests where they became the Palestinians.  Peace returned to Sinai and for forty years (1187 to 1147 BC) the Egyptians worked the mines with help from both Egypt and Canaan.  In 1147, Ramses VI withdrew financial support for both the garrison in Palestine and the mines in Sinai, leaving a lot of unemployed miners to fend for themselves.  Most just went home to Canaan, but a few who were natives of Sinai and/or Egyptians with no place to go home to, became bandits (aka "habiru").

That's the story in a nutshell.
Doug

Yeah, so exodus of the bible, never happened.

"A cat has nine lives. For three he plays, for three he strays, and for the last three he stays."


July 17th, 2008 (Full moon the next night)

RAPTORS! http://www.unexplain...pic=233151&st=0


#39    Doug1o29

Doug1o29

    Majestic 12 Operative

  • Member
  • 6,479 posts
  • Joined:01 Aug 2007
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:oklahoma

Posted 07 July 2013 - 12:31 AM

View PostImaginarynumber1, on 06 July 2013 - 11:13 PM, said:

Yeah, so exodus of the bible, never happened.
OK.  It didn't happen exactly as written, but the story is founded on real events, even if they're arranged to make a story that didn't actually happen.  There are a few kernels of truth in the legend.
Doug

Edited by Doug1o29, 07 July 2013 - 12:34 AM.

If I have seen farther than other men, it is because I stood on the shoulders of giants. --Bernard de Chartres
The beginning of knowledge is the realization that one doesn't and cannot know everything.
Science is the father of knowledge, but opinion breeds ignorance. --Hippocrates
Ignorance is not an opinion. --Adam Scott

#40    Doug1o29

Doug1o29

    Majestic 12 Operative

  • Member
  • 6,479 posts
  • Joined:01 Aug 2007
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:oklahoma

Posted 07 July 2013 - 12:39 AM

View PostJor-el, on 06 July 2013 - 09:19 PM, said:

I must indeed disagree since the quote is verbatim and exists long before the Alexandrian manuscripts redacted the book of Mark to fit their beliefs which do not hold the resurrection of the body of Jesus.
This is going to take some reading.  I'll post what I find.

I get the impression that a lot of gospel writers had just one version of a gospel in their possession when they wrote and were unaware of, or not familiar with, other versions that existed at the same time.  The existence of these often very similar documents creates the impression that a writer is quoting from one when he is actually quoting from another, or writing from memory.
Doug

If I have seen farther than other men, it is because I stood on the shoulders of giants. --Bernard de Chartres
The beginning of knowledge is the realization that one doesn't and cannot know everything.
Science is the father of knowledge, but opinion breeds ignorance. --Hippocrates
Ignorance is not an opinion. --Adam Scott

#41    Imaginarynumber1

Imaginarynumber1

    I am not an irrational number

  • Member
  • 4,836 posts
  • Joined:22 Mar 2010
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:Ohio

Posted 07 July 2013 - 12:51 AM

View PostDoug1o29, on 07 July 2013 - 12:31 AM, said:

OK.  It didn't happen exactly as written, but the story is founded on real events, even if they're arranged to make a story that didn't actually happen.  There are a few kernels of truth in the legend.
Doug

That I can agree on. Though I did find the brief history lesson informative. :tu:

"A cat has nine lives. For three he plays, for three he strays, and for the last three he stays."


July 17th, 2008 (Full moon the next night)

RAPTORS! http://www.unexplain...pic=233151&st=0


#42    Mr Walker

Mr Walker

    Forum Divinity

  • Member
  • 15,648 posts
  • Joined:09 Nov 2005
  • Gender:Not Selected
  • Location:Australia

  • Sometimes the Phantom leaves the jungle, and walks the streets of the city like an ordinary man.

Posted 07 July 2013 - 01:18 AM

View Postfullywired, on 06 July 2013 - 04:25 PM, said:

WOW!!!!!!!
:w00t: :w00t: :w00t: :w00t: :w00t:

Words fail me

  fullywired :cry:

Well thats a first. :innocent:

i got a little bit annoyed at the presumption that just  because a person reads the bible they are not otherwise well read My wife and i as with all my family are readers and have been from a couple of years of age We do a lot of other things as well but we would both read for an average of five or six hours a day. For me that is long enough to read a long novel or an autobibography and my wife reads about the same pace. So, a book a day is normal .  it took me an hour to read "the english patient" for example. Sometimes if i stay up reading for a couple hours, of  it could be two books a day and 3 or 4 on a week end.

I also read  a couple of newspapers and a magazine every day and do the three crosswords in the state newspaper within an hour.

We dont have kids or the comitments which go with them, we dont go out to the pub or clubs, and we dont play organised sport  although we do a lot of walking and shell collecting, so we ahve plenty of time. Most of the  "Classic"books I mentioned I read while at school, because back  in the 1960s they were a part of the English reading lists for students.


But my main point was that reading the bible is not an indicator of a failure to read or to be intelligent or knowledgeable.

You are a child of the universe, no less than the trees and the stars; you have a right to be here. And whether or not it is clear to you, no doubt the universe is unfolding as it should.

Therefore be at peace with God, whatever you conceive Him to be, and whatever your labors and aspirations, in the noisy confusion of life keep peace with your soul.

With all its sham, drudgery and broken dreams, it is still a beautiful world..

Be cheerful.

Strive to be happy.

#43    Mr Walker

Mr Walker

    Forum Divinity

  • Member
  • 15,648 posts
  • Joined:09 Nov 2005
  • Gender:Not Selected
  • Location:Australia

  • Sometimes the Phantom leaves the jungle, and walks the streets of the city like an ordinary man.

Posted 07 July 2013 - 01:24 AM

View PostRlyeh, on 06 July 2013 - 05:07 PM, said:

This the same wife who is creationist? Bet it doesn't stand up to a good science book.
My wife is a creatinist by faith. This has no connection to her intelligence or knowledge She watches david attenborough documentaries and knows their content but feels the poor man is deluded. I disagree. As an evolutionist I read creationist literarture and see the flaws in it.

Again the tendency is to see religionists as stupid ignorant, or uneducated. In australia the reverse is statistically true.

My wife, for logical reasons of her own, including her own well being and contentment, chooses faith in a creator god over knowledge of science and fact. That doesn't mean she doesnt KNOW the science or the historical facts They are just less relevant /important to her than her relationship with god. It doesnt matter to her if she is wrong about science, but it matters a lot if she would be wrong with god.

Edited by Mr Walker, 07 July 2013 - 01:26 AM.

You are a child of the universe, no less than the trees and the stars; you have a right to be here. And whether or not it is clear to you, no doubt the universe is unfolding as it should.

Therefore be at peace with God, whatever you conceive Him to be, and whatever your labors and aspirations, in the noisy confusion of life keep peace with your soul.

With all its sham, drudgery and broken dreams, it is still a beautiful world..

Be cheerful.

Strive to be happy.

#44    Frank Merton

Frank Merton

    Blue fish

  • Member
  • 14,373 posts
  • Joined:22 Jan 2013
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:Ho Chi Minh City, Vietnam

  • fmerton.blogspot.com

Posted 07 July 2013 - 01:30 AM

Between creationism and evolution there is no comparison.  One is a creation myth, the other is the science that describes the living world and how it came to be as it is.  They each have their use.


#45    Mr Walker

Mr Walker

    Forum Divinity

  • Member
  • 15,648 posts
  • Joined:09 Nov 2005
  • Gender:Not Selected
  • Location:Australia

  • Sometimes the Phantom leaves the jungle, and walks the streets of the city like an ordinary man.

Posted 07 July 2013 - 02:10 AM

View PostFrank Merton, on 07 July 2013 - 01:30 AM, said:

Between creationism and evolution there is no comparison.  One is a creation myth, the other is the science that describes the living world and how it came to be as it is.  They each have their use.
This is very true. It depends, I guess to an individual, which is more critical, significant or important in their own world view and heart/mind. For my wife science is basically irrelevant (what she believes about it cant hurt her) and so can be dismissed. Her life revolves around god and her hope  and expectation is for eternal life. This life is, in a way, irrelevant compared with eternity in a palce of peace learning and joy.

I am different. For me this life is all i have, and god helps me make the most of it, of myself, and my ability to serve others. That brings peace, empowerment and joy in this life, which very few humans seem to attain, and that is enough for me.

You are a child of the universe, no less than the trees and the stars; you have a right to be here. And whether or not it is clear to you, no doubt the universe is unfolding as it should.

Therefore be at peace with God, whatever you conceive Him to be, and whatever your labors and aspirations, in the noisy confusion of life keep peace with your soul.

With all its sham, drudgery and broken dreams, it is still a beautiful world..

Be cheerful.

Strive to be happy.




0 user(s) are reading this topic

0 members, 0 guests, 0 anonymous users