Jump to content




Welcome to Unexplained Mysteries! Please sign in or create an account to start posting and to access a host of extra features.


- - - - -

JFK Assassination


  • Please log in to reply
508 replies to this topic

#61    IamsSon

IamsSon

    Unobservable Matter

  • Member
  • 11,863 posts
  • Joined:01 Jul 2006
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:Houston, TX

  • ďIf you canít explain it simply, you donít understand it well enough.Ē ~ Albert Einstein

Posted 05 November 2010 - 04:39 PM

View PostTK0001, on 05 November 2010 - 04:09 PM, said:

I didn't say I own a rifle. I have shot a rifle. And I understand that in order to hit a moving target you have to lead it a bit. I also understand a target moving at 5 mph away from you barely has to be led at all.
Sorry, for some reason I assumed rifle ownership.  Remember, your standard was a regular person, not used to firing a weapon.  Even hitting a stationary target at distance is hard for many people.

Quote

I am not a hunter, but my entire family is. Hunters generally don't shoot at moving targets. They usually wait until the animal is stationary before taking the shot. This is getting off-subject, but for your argument to be true, bow hunting would be non-existent.

Hitting a target with a single round really isn't as difficult as you're making it seem here.
I said the same thing as what you said (the bolded part).  Nothing I said would make bow hunting non-existent.  


Quote

Yes, but that's completely beside the point, unless you're trying to convince me the only way a person can hit a target with a gun is to spray bullets all over the place and hope to hit it. No disrespect, but that's silly.
Not at all.  I'm saying hitting a moving target is not easy.

Quote

I'm sorry that I haven't gotten more into this in detail. I want to compare this to other testimony and evidence in order to form an opinion. I still don't understand where this is taken from, but it seems to want to prove the Warren Commission wrong, which tells me it's not an unbiased source.
I just showed you the information is coming from documents resulting from the Warren Commission or used by the Warren Commission.

Quote

If Oswald truly did appear on the second floor only seconds after the shots were fired and didn't appear out of breath at all, I would certainly agree that sounds fishy. Since this case is over 40 years old, and Oswald has never been exonerated, I think there's more to the story.
Of course there is!  That's why some of us believe there is a conspiracy.

Quote

Also, do you believe someone else fired from the 6th floor of the TSBD? I would say someone would have had to, if it drew the officer's attention. The question is if it was actually Oswald or not, correct?
I do not believe Oswald shot.  I believe there is plenty of evidence that he was not the shooter.

View PostTK0001, on 05 November 2010 - 04:09 PM, said:

I didn't say I own a rifle. I have shot a rifle. And I understand that in order to hit a moving target you have to lead it a bit. I also understand a target moving at 5 mph away from you barely has to be led at all.
Sorry, for some reason I assumed rifle ownership.  Remember, your standard was a regular person, not used to firing a weapon.  Even hitting a stationary target at distance is hard for many people.

Quote

I am not a hunter, but my entire family is. Hunters generally don't shoot at moving targets. They usually wait until the animal is stationary before taking the shot. This is getting off-subject, but for your argument to be true, bow hunting would be non-existent.

Hitting a target with a single round really isn't as difficult as you're making it seem here.
I said the same thing as what you said (the bolded part).  Nothing I said would make bow hunting non-existent.  


Quote

Yes, but that's completely beside the point, unless you're trying to convince me the only way a person can hit a target with a gun is to spray bullets all over the place and hope to hit it. No disrespect, but that's silly.
Not at all.  I'm saying hitting a moving target is not easy.

Quote

I'm sorry that I haven't gotten more into this in detail. I want to compare this to other testimony and evidence in order to form an opinion. I still don't understand where this is taken from, but it seems to want to prove the Warren Commission wrong, which tells me it's not an unbiased source.
I just showed you the information is coming from documents resulting from the Warren Commission or used by the Warren Commission.

Quote

If Oswald truly did appear on the second floor only seconds after the shots were fired and didn't appear out of breath at all, I would certainly agree that sounds fishy. Since this case is over 40 years old, and Oswald has never been exonerated, I think there's more to the story.
Of course there is!  That's why some of us believe there is a conspiracy.

Quote

Also, do you believe someone else fired from the 6th floor of the TSBD? I would say someone would have had to, if it drew the officer's attention. The question is if it was actually Oswald or not, correct?
I do not believe Oswald shot.  I believe there is plenty of evidence that he was not the shooter.

"But then with me that horrid doubt always arises whether the convictions of man's mind which has been developed from the mind of the lower animals, are of any value or at all trustworthy. Would any one trust in the convictions of a monkey's mind, if there are any convictions in such a mind?" - Charles Darwin, in a letter to William Graham on July 3, 1881

#62    SolarPlexus

SolarPlexus

    Warrior of Light

  • Member
  • 3,432 posts
  • Joined:28 Sep 2007
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:Serbia

  • .....This moment contains all moments.....

    ...You dont have a Soul. You are a Soul. You have a body.....

Posted 06 November 2010 - 01:09 AM

TK do you know whats a 'patsy' ?


Posted Image

Edited by SolarPlexus, 06 November 2010 - 01:10 AM.

"In questions of science, the authority of a thousand is not worth the humble reasoning of a single individual."
Galileo Galilei
Posted Image
"Who never walks save where he sees men's tracks makes no discoveries."J.G. Holland

#63    Eric Kiln

Eric Kiln

    Alien Embryo

  • Member
  • Pip
  • 8 posts
  • Joined:31 Oct 2010
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:USA

Posted 06 November 2010 - 04:23 AM

I have to agree with IamsSon. I've shot many rounds with many types of rifles, shotguns, and pistols.

Hitting a moving target can be a very difficult thing to do. Hitting a stationary object can be a difficult thing to do.

There are just so many things that are involved. Distance, windage, ammo type, lead time, rifle type, mental and physical conditions... Take a look at the show TOP SHOT for instance. These guys are decent shooters and many had a hard time firing their weapon of choice in a stressful/timed situation at stationary objects at reasonable distances.

I'm not saying it is impossible but just being trained in the military or even a sharp shooter does not by any means make it an easy shot especially under that kind of pressure.

I don't find the lone gunman that hard to believe however its all the shenanigans leading up to the assassination I find interesting.


#64    Little Fish

Little Fish

    Government Agent

  • Member
  • 4,000 posts
  • Joined:23 Jul 2009
  • Gender:Not Selected

  • The default position is to give a ****

Posted 06 November 2010 - 10:58 AM

oswald was to supposed to have shot from up in the building. would a rifle have to be calibrated if shooting downwards due to different gravity effects on the bullet compared to a horizontal shot?
if so, it would be unlikely that oswald would have done this rifle calibration, given he didn't plan much of a getaway.


#65    TK0001

TK0001

    THIMK!!!

  • Member
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 1,806 posts
  • Joined:15 Feb 2006
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:Michigan, USA

Posted 06 November 2010 - 10:21 PM

IamsSon:

I'm digging through the testimony of Marrion Baker to the Warren Commission Here, and it seems the article you sourced didn't tell the entire story.

First of all, the article seems to want to point to the fact that Oswald didn't seem startled in any way, but as I recall from the footage I've seen, he never seemed startled throughout the whole process of being booked and supposedly falsely accused. I just don't see how this is relevant.

Next the article mentions a 90 second window of time for Officer Baker to travel from his motorcycle to the second floor. This number came from tests he ran on March 20, in which he did it once in 90 seconds and another in which he did it in 75. However:

Quote

Mr. BELIN - You mentioned the relationship between what we did on March 20 and what actually occurred on November 22. Would you estimate that what we did on March 20 was the maximum or the minimum as for the time you took?
Mr. BAKER - I would say it would be the minimum.
Mr. BELIN - For instance, on March 20 did we do anything about trying to get through any people on the front steps of the building at all? Did we slow down at all for that?
Mr. BAKER - No, sir.
Mr. BELIN - Did we slow down at all on March 20 for the time it took you to look over the scene as to what was happening in the area down Elm Street and the Parkway?
Mr. BAKER - No, sir.

It moves on from there. I would have liked to hear how much time he would have added to it due to the items mentioned above and also to speak to Mr. Truly, get him to take him to the elevator, and also to wait for the elevator. He testified that Mr. Truly hollered twice for the elevator to descend, but it never did, so they took the stairs up. There was no mention whether or not they factored this into the test.

It goes on to say they timed a descent from the 6th floor to the (assuming) 2nd floor lunchroom, and it took them 1 minute 18 seconds the first try and 1 minute 14 seconds the second try:

Quote

Mr. BELIN - Did we make any or do any stopwatch tests about any route from the southeast corner of the sixth floor down to the lunchroom?
Mr. BAKER - Yes, sir; we made two test runs.
Mr. BELIN - All right. Do you remember what the route was?
Mr. BAKER - Yes, sir; we started on the sixth floor on the east side of the building.
Mr. BELIN - All right.
Mr. BAKER - We walked down the east wall.
Mr. BELIN - We started at that particular corner?
Mr. BAKER - Yes, sir; we started in the southeast corner.
Mr. BELIN - All right. We walked down the east wall, you say?
Mr. BAKER - That is right.
Mr. BELIN - All right, then where did we go?
Mr. BAKER - To the north wall and then we walked down the north wall to the west side of where the stairs was.
Mr. BELIN - All right, we walked from the southeast corner to the northeast corner?
Mr. BAKER - That is right.
Mr. BELIN - Then along the northeast corner, around the elevators, do you remember who was with us when we did this?
Mr. BAKER - Yes, sir. There was, it seems to me like his name was John--anyway, he was a Secret Service man.
Mr. BELIN - John Howlett.
Mr. BAKER - John Howlett. That is right, sir.
Mr. BELIN - Did Mr. Howlett simulate anyone putting a gun in any particular place?
Mr. BAKER - Yes, sir; he did.
Mr. BELIN - And then what did we do when we got to the where did he do that, do you remember?
Mr. BAKER - That would be as we approached the stairway, there were some cases of books on the left- hand side there.
Mr. BELIN - All right. And Secret Service Agent Howlett went over to these books and leaned over as if he were putting a rifle there?
Mr. BAKER - That is right, sir.
Mr. BELIN - Then what did he do?
Mr. BAKER - Then we continued on down the stairs.
Mr. BELIN - To the lunchroom?
Mr. BAKER - That is right, sir.
Mr. BELIN - Do you remember how long that took?
Mr. BAKER - The first run with normal walking took us a minute and 18 seconds.
Mr. BELIN - What about the second time?
Mr. BAKER - And the second time we did it at a fast walk which took us a minute and 14 seconds.

I understand there is an argument that Oswald supposedly did not take these stairs, however, and I will have to dig into that at another time, as once again I am pressed for time.


#66    TK0001

TK0001

    THIMK!!!

  • Member
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 1,806 posts
  • Joined:15 Feb 2006
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:Michigan, USA

Posted 06 November 2010 - 10:57 PM

View PostEric Kiln, on 06 November 2010 - 04:23 AM, said:


I'm not saying it is impossible but just being trained in the military or even a sharp shooter does not by any means make it an easy shot especially under that kind of pressure.

I don't think it was an easy shot, per se. But I also don't think it's as difficult a shot as what it's being made out to be. I'll have to look into it further when I have more time.

Also, I've been persistent in mentioning three shots were taken in total, with only one hitting the target. This indicates nervousness and pressure. And Oswald did seem like a collected, calm type of guy as I mentioned earlier.


#67    IamsSon

IamsSon

    Unobservable Matter

  • Member
  • 11,863 posts
  • Joined:01 Jul 2006
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:Houston, TX

  • ďIf you canít explain it simply, you donít understand it well enough.Ē ~ Albert Einstein

Posted 07 November 2010 - 07:38 PM

View PostTK0001, on 06 November 2010 - 10:21 PM, said:

IamsSon:

I'm digging through the testimony of Marrion Baker to the Warren Commission Here, and it seems the article you sourced didn't tell the entire story.

First of all, the article seems to want to point to the fact that Oswald didn't seem startled in any way, but as I recall from the footage I've seen, he never seemed startled throughout the whole process of being booked and supposedly falsely accused. I just don't see how this is relevant.
Not only that he was not startled, but what is important here is that he wasn't out of breath or agitated.

Quote

Next the article mentions a 90 second window of time for Officer Baker to travel from his motorcycle to the second floor. This number came from tests he ran on March 20, in which he did it once in 90 seconds and another in which he did it in 75. However:
The article goes into detail on why the author believes the time was still less than two minutes.



Quote

It moves on from there. I would have liked to hear how much time he would have added to it due to the items mentioned above and also to speak to Mr. Truly, get him to take him to the elevator, and also to wait for the elevator. He testified that Mr. Truly hollered twice for the elevator to descend, but it never did, so they took the stairs up. There was no mention whether or not they factored this into the test.

It goes on to say they timed a descent from the 6th floor to the (assuming) 2nd floor lunchroom, and it took them 1 minute 18 seconds the first try and 1 minute 14 seconds the second try:



I understand there is an argument that Oswald supposedly did not take these stairs, however, and I will have to dig into that at another time, as once again I am pressed for time.
The testimony presented to the Warren Commission included testimony that the rifle was not merely placed behind the book boxes, but that there was obvious work done to keep the rifle from being easily visible and was only seen once some boxes were actually moved.

"But then with me that horrid doubt always arises whether the convictions of man's mind which has been developed from the mind of the lower animals, are of any value or at all trustworthy. Would any one trust in the convictions of a monkey's mind, if there are any convictions in such a mind?" - Charles Darwin, in a letter to William Graham on July 3, 1881

#68    IamsSon

IamsSon

    Unobservable Matter

  • Member
  • 11,863 posts
  • Joined:01 Jul 2006
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:Houston, TX

  • ďIf you canít explain it simply, you donít understand it well enough.Ē ~ Albert Einstein

Posted 07 November 2010 - 07:45 PM

View PostTK0001, on 06 November 2010 - 10:57 PM, said:

I don't think it was an easy shot, per se. But I also don't think it's as difficult a shot as what it's being made out to be. I'll have to look into it further when I have more time.

Also, I've been persistent in mentioning three shots were taken in total, with only one hitting the target. This indicates nervousness and pressure. And Oswald did seem like a collected, calm type of guy as I mentioned earlier.
Actually, there were two hits.  One shot hit Kennedy in the throat, and then another hit his head.  There is sound evidence that suggest more than three shots.  In fact, the United States House Select Committee on Assassinations concluded there were at least four shots, with the assassin at the School Book Depository firing the first, second, and fourth shots. Source

"But then with me that horrid doubt always arises whether the convictions of man's mind which has been developed from the mind of the lower animals, are of any value or at all trustworthy. Would any one trust in the convictions of a monkey's mind, if there are any convictions in such a mind?" - Charles Darwin, in a letter to William Graham on July 3, 1881

#69    SolarPlexus

SolarPlexus

    Warrior of Light

  • Member
  • 3,432 posts
  • Joined:28 Sep 2007
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:Serbia

  • .....This moment contains all moments.....

    ...You dont have a Soul. You are a Soul. You have a body.....

Posted 08 November 2010 - 02:33 AM

Scapegoating


Look at me im Lee Harvey Oswald baa baa


Posted Image

"In questions of science, the authority of a thousand is not worth the humble reasoning of a single individual."
Galileo Galilei
Posted Image
"Who never walks save where he sees men's tracks makes no discoveries."J.G. Holland

#70    TK0001

TK0001

    THIMK!!!

  • Member
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 1,806 posts
  • Joined:15 Feb 2006
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:Michigan, USA

Posted 08 November 2010 - 03:59 PM

View PostIamsSon, on 07 November 2010 - 07:45 PM, said:

Actually, there were two hits.  One shot hit Kennedy in the throat, and then another hit his head.  There is sound evidence that suggest more than three shots.  In fact, the United States House Select Committee on Assassinations concluded there were at least four shots, with the assassin at the School Book Depository firing the first, second, and fourth shots. Source

Yes, but since Oswald (or, the shooter) probably was aiming at Kennedy's head and not his throat, I would consider the second shot a miss.


#71    IamsSon

IamsSon

    Unobservable Matter

  • Member
  • 11,863 posts
  • Joined:01 Jul 2006
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:Houston, TX

  • ďIf you canít explain it simply, you donít understand it well enough.Ē ~ Albert Einstein

Posted 08 November 2010 - 05:04 PM

View PostTK0001, on 08 November 2010 - 03:59 PM, said:

Yes, but since Oswald (or, the shooter) probably was aiming at Kennedy's head and not his throat, I would consider the second shot a miss.
I respectfully disagree.  There is no way to determine where specifically the shooter at the School Book Depository was aiming, but we can determine he was shooting at President Kennedy, so we know two of his shots hit the President (many of us believe there were actually two shots that hit his head).

"But then with me that horrid doubt always arises whether the convictions of man's mind which has been developed from the mind of the lower animals, are of any value or at all trustworthy. Would any one trust in the convictions of a monkey's mind, if there are any convictions in such a mind?" - Charles Darwin, in a letter to William Graham on July 3, 1881

#72    TK0001

TK0001

    THIMK!!!

  • Member
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 1,806 posts
  • Joined:15 Feb 2006
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:Michigan, USA

Posted 08 November 2010 - 06:21 PM

View PostIamsSon, on 08 November 2010 - 05:04 PM, said:

I respectfully disagree.  There is no way to determine where specifically the shooter at the School Book Depository was aiming, but we can determine he was shooting at President Kennedy, so we know two of his shots hit the President (many of us believe there were actually two shots that hit his head).

So why did he shoot again?

I think it's a bit silly to think he was trying to hit Kennedy anywhere but the head. Why would he be trying to just wing him?


#73    IamsSon

IamsSon

    Unobservable Matter

  • Member
  • 11,863 posts
  • Joined:01 Jul 2006
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:Houston, TX

  • ďIf you canít explain it simply, you donít understand it well enough.Ē ~ Albert Einstein

Posted 08 November 2010 - 07:05 PM

View PostTK0001, on 08 November 2010 - 06:21 PM, said:

So why did he shoot again?
I don't know.  Do you?

Quote

I think it's a bit silly to think he was trying to hit Kennedy anywhere but the head. Why would he be trying to just wing him?
I don't know and since he was assassinated before going to trial, we will never know.

"But then with me that horrid doubt always arises whether the convictions of man's mind which has been developed from the mind of the lower animals, are of any value or at all trustworthy. Would any one trust in the convictions of a monkey's mind, if there are any convictions in such a mind?" - Charles Darwin, in a letter to William Graham on July 3, 1881

#74    Belial

Belial

    Devilish chappy.

  • Member
  • 4,417 posts
  • Joined:28 Jan 2007
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:In a bag of skittles, on ocean keys beach.

  • dogs bark cats meow i fart go figure?

Posted 08 November 2010 - 07:32 PM

Theres a new tv show over here in the Uk this week on the history channel i think, it's looking at new police tape recordings of mob members at the time and conversations they had talking of the Kennedy killing in detail, looks interesting.

Where it states "For official use only" - gently rub a white wax candle over the area indicated.

Kick a habit - i never did like Tolkien...

#75    TK0001

TK0001

    THIMK!!!

  • Member
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 1,806 posts
  • Joined:15 Feb 2006
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:Michigan, USA

Posted 08 November 2010 - 08:00 PM

View PostIamsSon, on 08 November 2010 - 07:05 PM, said:

I don't know.  Do you?

Yes. Because he didn't hit him in the head on the second shot, so he took a bit more time and lined up the last shot more precisely and squeezed the trigger.

I know you'll say that since no one is on record saying this that "we'll never know", but you have to apply common sense at some point, right? Does anyone take up a rifle and set out to wound the president? Of course not.





0 user(s) are reading this topic

0 members, 0 guests, 0 anonymous users