Often wrongly portrayed as a cold rationalist, Isaac Newton is one of history's most compelling figures. It is true that he was capable of the most precise and logical thought it is possible for a human to achieve: his three years of obsessive work that gave birth to the Principia, containing his theory of gravity, stand as the greatest achievement in science.
Just as certainly, though, he was also consumed with what we would now view as completely unscientific pursuits: alchemy and biblical prophesy.
http://www.guardian....entist-sorcerer
1
Was Isaac Newton a scientist or a sorcerer?
Started by
Still Waters
, Sep 26 2012 08:47 PM
isaac newton
6 replies to this topic
#1
Still Waters
-
-
- 31,938 posts
Deeply Mysterious
- Joined:01 Jun 2008
- Gender:Female
-
Que Sera, Sera - Whatever will be, will be..
Posted 26 September 2012 - 08:47 PM
#2
Darkwind
-
- Member
-
- 7,978 posts
Bio-Electric sentient being.
- Joined:23 Jun 2004
- Gender:Male
- Location:The Hurricane State
-
Don't Be an Idiot.
Posted 26 September 2012 - 09:10 PM
It was my understanding he was both. He was an alchemist.
#3
CRIPTIC CHAMELEON
-
- Member
-
- 703 posts
Astral Projection
- Joined:27 Feb 2012
- Gender:Male
- Location:Annwyn
-
Without going out of my door
I can know all things of earth
Without looking out of my window
I could know the ways of heaven
Posted 26 September 2012 - 09:38 PM
Darkwind, on 26 September 2012 - 09:10 PM, said:
It was my understanding he was both. He was an alchemist.
#4
Lilly
-
-
- 13,161 posts
Forum Divinity
- Joined:16 Apr 2004
- Gender:Female
-
"To thine own self be true" William Shakespeare
Posted 26 September 2012 - 10:26 PM
All I know is that Sir Isaac Newton was a really, really smart person. 
"Ignorance is ignorance. It is a state of mind, not an opinion." ~MID~
"All that live must die, passing through nature to eternity." ~Shakespeare~
"All that live must die, passing through nature to eternity." ~Shakespeare~
#5
Waspie_Dwarf
-
-
- 25,915 posts
Space Cadet
- Joined:03 Mar 2006
- Gender:Male
- Location:Bexleyheath, Kent, UK
-
We are all in the gutter, but some of us are looking at the stars.
Oscar Wilde
Posted 26 September 2012 - 11:36 PM
Alchemy was, at that time, indistinguishable from chemistry, just as astrology and astronomy were also, once, one and the same thing. Modern science rejects both alchemy and astrology and would not consider anyone following these pursuits as a scientist, However Newton was a scientist and we have to view him as he would have been seen in his life time.
"Space is big. Really big. You just won't believe how vastly, hugely, mind-boggingly big it is. I mean, you may think it's a long way down the street to the chemist, but that's just peanuts to space." - The Hitch-Hikers Guide to the Galaxy - Douglas Adams 1952 - 2001
Click on button
Click on button
#6
Parsec
-
- Member
-
- 89 posts
Alien Embryo
- Joined:15 Sep 2012
- Gender:Male
- Location:Italy
Posted 01 October 2012 - 10:16 PM
Waspie_Dwarf, on 26 September 2012 - 11:36 PM, said:
Alchemy was, at that time, indistinguishable from chemistry, just as astrology and astronomy were also, once, one and the same thing. Modern science rejects both alchemy and astrology and would not consider anyone following these pursuits as a scientist, However Newton was a scientist and we have to view him as he would have been seen in his life time.
I like your reply Waspie, Newton was simply a studious of God's Creation (as meant in his times). For him there was no difference between Mechanics and Alchemy, the study of objects motion and the Bible. They had the same dignity for him (and maybe the aspects of the physical world were even less important).
To me, the real difference between (serious) alchemy and chemistry is only that in the latter there's a separation between matter and spirit.
Unfortunately this is the result of the "Age of Enlightenment" (I know that Newton was part of it, but I mean that the offspring from the original Enlightenment gave as a result an ostracism to spiritual beliefs and produced a new "religion": Materialism).
Alchemists used (invented) the scientific method; the only difference with Chemistry was their goal: Chemistry investigates and sticks to the physical world, while Alchemy used it as a metaphor for Man's improvement.
#7
wolfknight
-
- Member
-
- 1,658 posts
Psychic Spy
- Joined:26 Jun 2007
- Gender:Male
- Location:USA Kentucky
-
There is nothing to Fear, but fear itself
Posted 05 October 2012 - 02:41 PM
Newton was way ahead of his time.
0 user(s) are reading this topic
0 members, 0 guests, 0 anonymous users
