What is this best theory then? It's not just 'simply' that evolution best fits naturalism, it's that there is no evidence of anything besides nature. Regardless, how has the fact that there is a better theory eluded the multitude of religious scientists and biologists? What has this alternative theory better explained than the current theory of evolution? I never really understand this line of argumentation, although it isn't that unusual, because there is nothing preventing any scientist from doing the research and work necessary to develop a better theory (and there are enormous rewards if someone could) under a non-naturalistic framework.
Welcome to Unexplained Mysteries! Please sign in or create an account to start posting and to access a host of extra features.
Religion & Science Are Closer Than You Think
40 replies to this topic
0 user(s) are reading this topic
0 members, 0 guests, 0 anonymous users