477 replies to this topic

[Abramelin]

There is so much logic in the evolution theory, that it never fails to amaze me that there are still people around who think some 4000 years old religious book knows better.

If that was true, we would still be cursing/fearing the 'gods' for thunder and lightning instead of inventing electrical machines.

[questionmark]

Abramelin, on 13 September 2012 - 07:23 PM, said:

There is so much logic in the evolution theory, that it never fails to amaze me that there are still people around who think some 4000 years old religious book knows better.

If that was true, we would still be cursing/fearing the 'gods' for thunder and lightning instead of inventing electrical machines.

Doubt it is 4000 years old, more like 3-3500, and then in a completely different version.

[Abramelin]

questionmark, on 13 September 2012 - 07:25 PM, said:

Doubt it is 4000 years old, more like 3-3500, and then in a completely different version.

Heh, then I am only 500 years off, and that without radio-carbon dating.

[Harsh86_Patel]

Abramelin, on 13 September 2012 - 07:23 PM, said:

There is so much logic in the evolution theory, that it never fails to amaze me that there are still people around who think some 4000 years old religious book knows better.

If that was true, we would still be cursing/fearing the 'gods' for thunder and lightning instead of inventing electrical machines.

The theory of evolution is itself 150 years old and all it's surface appeal is replaced by glaring questions as biology has progressed leaps and bounds.The theory of evolution has to fight for it's life with every new discovery in modern biology.
http://www.ridgenet....sage/v5i10f.htm
http://scienceagains...info/topics.htm
http://www.newgeolog...entation32.html

Also ask any evolutionist to point out any instance where life has been created from non-living objects under any laboratory conditions.'Spontaneous and random creation of life' is a concept on which the whole theory is built........it states that the first life came into existence randomly under natural circumstances and then evolved.All of this has no proof at all.Until life is created artificially i will reserve my doubts about evolution.

Edited by Harsh86_Patel, 14 September 2012 - 10:03 AM.

[Abramelin]

Evolution has nothing to do with how life came into being,

It's, like the word says, about 'evolving'.

So you can ask an evolutionist about it, and you will get an educated guess. That's all.

Anyway, evolution theory is a theory based on finds and science, it's an ongoing discovery, and no doubt the theory will be refined, get some adaptations.

That's far different from using an old book that is at most 3500 or 4000 years old.

.

Edited by Abramelin, 14 September 2012 - 12:46 PM.

[Iron_Lotus]

Harsh86_Patel, on 14 September 2012 - 09:59 AM, said:

The theory of evolution is itself 150 years old and all it's surface appeal is replaced by glaring questions as biology has progressed leaps and bounds.The theory of evolution has to fight for it's life with every new discovery in modern biology.
http://www.ridgenet....sage/v5i10f.htm
http://scienceagains...info/topics.htm
http://www.newgeolog...entation32.html

Also ask any evolutionist to point out any instance where life has been created from non-living objects under any laboratory conditions.'Spontaneous and random creation of life' is a concept on which the whole theory is built........it states that the first life came into existence randomly under natural circumstances and then evolved.All of this has no proof at all.Until life is created artificially i will reserve my doubts about evolution.

......

[Quaentum]

Creationists are a lot like flat earthers.  They both view the world through antiquated concepts based on antiquated information.

[Armchair Educated]

High fives pet Raptor because no ones caught on to the conspiracy yet. ive said too much.......

[lizzieboo]

Direct answer: No.

On a more whimsical note: They still do. My husband and I, for example, have a close personal friend named Bob. He is a plesiosaur who eats only Oreo cookies. (I cannot resist adding that, according to the Google Chrome browser spell-checker, the top suggestion for the correct spelling of "plesiosaur" is "applesauce." This made my day.)

[lizzieboo]

Quaentum, on 14 September 2012 - 01:19 PM, said:

Creationists are a lot like flat earthers.  They both view the world through antiquated concepts based on antiquated information.

You forgot to mention that both groups seem to have been born with a congenital immunity to logic or scientific evidence.

[Harsh86_Patel]

lizzieboo, on 14 September 2012 - 01:42 PM, said:

You forgot to mention that both groups seem to have been born with a congenital immunity to logic or scientific evidence.

Hello Lizzie boo,i always thought you were a die hard believer in God.Try telling that to an evolutionist,and you will be branded as a person impervious to logic.

[Harsh86_Patel]

Quaentum, on 14 September 2012 - 01:19 PM, said:

Creationists are a lot like flat earthers.  They both view the world through antiquated concepts based on antiquated information.

People who claim they believe in science but love to tell stories in the guise of science-evolutionists

[Quaentum]

Harsh86_Patel, on 14 September 2012 - 03:17 PM, said:

People who claim they believe in science but love to tell stories in the guise of science-evolutionists

Yet you have been shown evidence that evolution is a reality. Your decision to ignore that reality is of course your right.

[Hippycrite]

There's some old film footage showing dinosaurs being used as construction equipment in a rock quarry.

[Ninhursag]

Are You Telling Me The Flintstones Were Not Real??!!