Ohhhh I see what he is going for with this whole "academic thing"... He just rips off William Lane Craig's "arguments" and changes Christian mythology to Islamic mythology. Classy, very academic of him.
Whether he uses Williams argunents or anothers the words are where the substance is, but its quite typical of you to use an argument from authority ie where are his acadamic credentials. This proves my point about being dogmatic regarding your clergy and science as a whole. When you cant deal with the substance you simply try and malign the messenger. Classy very classy but expected from you!
Christian theology and philosophy carry similiraties with islamic theology and philosophy its inevitable yet you seem to think of it as a negative, thats simply based on your hidden assumptions which dictate your dogmatic bias againts any theology which challenges your dogma and clergy.....your simply proving point yourself!