Alienated Being, on 24 November 2012 - 08:08 PM, said:
We have plenty of evidence? Really? What evidence do we have? I would be interested in seeing what evidence you provide to the table. What we understand about how the human body and how it operates, it is that when we die... our bodies cease function, and begin to decompose. We have no sense of awareness; all of our sense are completely revoked as our brain is what is in control of everything. Once that dies, we lose all sense of consciousness... You won't know that you are dead when you die. Do not go and take experiences after clinical death, either, as clinical death is only concluded when the heart stops... not when the brain dies.
Oh, and I don't want any "testimonials" or near-death experiences. I want other evidence, because as far as I am concerned, those agents are not evidence for the afterlife -- they are evidence of what people perceive as being the afterlife, and I am not looking for misinterpreted perception.
This is because you are a fundamentalist. You have an undieing faith in pure materialism and empiricism. The first of which is prooven to be a philosophy not based in reality the second a completely flawed approach to test the extremes of fundamental reality.
You have zero evidence that there is no awareness after brain death. This is a brain as a producer of conciousness philosoph. In fact closely studied events would seem to suggest otherwise. Notice I did not say proove. It's just evidence not proof. We need a greater body of evidence to approach "proof".
That's nice that you perceive it to be that way. But quite obviously it's evidence for a far majority of people reguarfdess of your philosophically adopted rules for what constituts as evidence or not evidence.
In truth you have no framework to understand at what point Somone would become aware of the spirit world upon approaching death along a continuum of conciousness. Or even how the information of the person would be attached to a body if indeed there is a spirit world. The definition for "death" is now all over the place. It is not your place to define it. If death is cessation of awareness then you would be right, but as the only kind of evidence that can exist if such a thing is true is suggesting, awareness may not stop once the body stops functioning even the brain. Creative scienceism conjecture dosnt cut it.
It dosnt matter an iota about what you want or do not want for evidence. Fortunately illogical bias based in scienceism does not rule the day.
Edited by Seeker79, 24 November 2012 - 09:41 PM.
"To know oneself is to study one self in action with another person. Relationship is a process of self evaluation and self revelation. Relationship is the mirror in which you discover yourself - to be is to be related."---Bruce Lee