46 replies to this topic

[~C.S.M~]

I think its a good idea. The moon has lot of resourches and the best platform for performing scientific research.

Also the technology advancement we will get by having a permanent moon base is more than enough to justify all the expenses: advancement in life support, AI, engierneering, chemistry, biology ect is beyond imagination.

Personally? I think we should have been insisting with Apollo, rather than cutting it away and replacing it with the space shuttle (now that was a waste) Mars is a secondary objective. The moon is near and much easier to go.

Edited by ~C.S.M~, 09 July 2012 - 03:25 PM.

[Super-Fly]

Coffey, on 16 June 2012 - 10:27 AM, said:

I've never understood why the space exploration isn't as important as it should be anymore. We keep hearing of things like Global warming, solar flares, meteors, other natural disasters that could wipe out the human race in the blink of an eye nd population growth which is a big concern. Surely we owe it to the human race as a whole to work out how to populate the stars. Shift loads of people and give the poor earth a bit of a break as well form being crammed with humans.

Of course this won't happen because of the greed int he world and the fact the goverments aren't evolved enough yet to realise world peace is the key to the human races survival and advancement.

ii find the same, all of a sudden to me the moon landings, research etc just waverd off. which i find it a great shame.
would be good if i were to see it in my life time but i doubt it.

Thanks OP!