Caesar Posted February 8, 2010 #1 Share Posted February 8, 2010 A LEADING British government scientist has warned the United Nations’ climate panel to tackle its blunders or lose all credibility. Robert Watson, chief scientist at Defra, the environment ministry, who chaired the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC) from 1997 to 2002, was speaking after more potential inaccuracies emerged in the IPCC’s 2007 benchmark report on global warming. The most important is a claim that global warming could cut rain-fed north African crop production by up to 50% by 2020, a remarkably short time for such a dramatic change. Read more... It never ends Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
keithisco Posted February 8, 2010 #2 Share Posted February 8, 2010 (edited) It never ends Perhaps not.... but when editorial staff start making counter claims then I think I know which body I would tend to believe!!! Not Rocket Science. From that editorial: Speaking at the 2008 global climate talks in Poznan, Poland, Pachauri said: "In some countries of Africa, yields from rain-fed agriculture could be reduced by 50% by 2020." In a speech last July, Ban said: "Yields from rain-fed agriculture could fall by half in some African countries over the next 10 years." Highlighting mine. Any Aussie care to say why Climate Change is not happening - after all in Oz everything is peachy is it not? A Continent wide drought, unprecedented - nah, must be wrong. Edited February 8, 2010 by keithisco Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Michelle Posted February 8, 2010 #3 Share Posted February 8, 2010 http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Drought_in_Australia Droughts are certainly uncommon there. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest Posted February 8, 2010 #4 Share Posted February 8, 2010 It is a reasonable claim made by a climate scientist from the potentially effected area. The fact that the IPCC used it as an authoritive source without peer review is however very unfortunate. Br Cornelius Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Caesar Posted February 9, 2010 Author #5 Share Posted February 9, 2010 It is a reasonable claim made by a climate scientist from the potentially effected area. The fact that the IPCC used it as an authoritive source without peer review is however very unfortunate. Br Cornelius We see this in just about every report by the IPCC Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
psyche101 Posted February 10, 2010 #6 Share Posted February 10, 2010 Speaking at the 2008 global climate talks in Poznan, Poland, Pachauri said: "In some countries of Africa, yields from rain-fed agriculture could be reduced by 50% by 2020." In a speech last July, Ban said: "Yields from rain-fed agriculture could fall by half in some African countries over the next 10 years." Any Aussie care to say why Climate Change is not happening - after all in Oz everything is peachy is it not? A Continent wide drought, unprecedented - nah, must be wrong. Que`? Australia is not in Africa. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
J.B. Posted February 10, 2010 #7 Share Posted February 10, 2010 They're political, not scientific. Too many politicians don't think, they just act. Ignore the IPCC and find sources on both sides that have said, "IPCC, we disown you, dig a hole and die." Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now