Jump to content




Welcome to Unexplained Mysteries! Please sign in or create an account to start posting and to access a host of extra features.


* * - - - 4 votes

Battle of L.A. ~another UFO hoax

ufo battle of l.a.

  • This topic is locked This topic is locked
82 replies to this topic

#61    Rafterman

Rafterman

    Telekinetic

  • Member
  • 6,954 posts
  • Joined:27 Sep 2010
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:Upstate

Posted 25 January 2014 - 05:22 AM

View Postlost_shaman, on 25 January 2014 - 03:20 AM, said:



The Gun Directors were computers not people. And they required a target being tracked in order to work. The crews couldnt just get "war nerves" and start blindly firing into the air!

By director I meant the commanders on the scene.  The system was not 100% automated.  There were still humans involved.  It was also a fairly new system and the operators were not exactly seasoned veterans.  

Not to mention, in addition to the larger guns that were used, there was also quite a bit of .50 cal. fire.

"You can't have freedom of religion without having freedom from the religious beliefs of other people."

#62    Antilles

Antilles

    NCC-1701

  • Member
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 1,220 posts
  • Joined:23 Jul 2011
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:2nd star from the left

Posted 25 January 2014 - 06:00 AM

Given that the US had radar on the Jap fighters as they flew over Oahu towards Pearl, I wouldn't doubt that they fired the kitchen sink at anything that showed up over LA that they couldn't immediately explain. Something about once bitten...


#63    lost_shaman

lost_shaman

    Majestic 12 Operative

  • Member
  • 5,530 posts
  • Joined:11 Jul 2006
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:TEXAS

Posted 25 January 2014 - 06:46 AM

View PostRafterman, on 25 January 2014 - 05:22 AM, said:



By director I meant the commanders on the scene.  The system was not 100% automated.  There were still humans involved.  It was also a fairly new system and the operators were not exactly seasoned veterans.  

Not to mention, in addition to the larger guns that were used, there was also quite a bit of .50 cal. fire.

Of course it would have been a non-event if it had just been some .50 cals being shot off blindly at nothing.

No. They were not 100% automated at all. The Guns using the Optical Range finders required crew members to use an instrument to visually track a target. It was like a long tube with two scopes one on each end and by focusing on the target with the two scopes being seperated by a distance the range to the target could be calculated by the director. Everything was hardwired together through the director so that the Target being optically tracked  went through the director and the director turned dials on the gun and the searchlight so that two crew members on the gun and two on the searchlight all attempted to crack their wheels and Zero their dials so that everything is tracking the same Target while the director calculated the trajectory of the shell to be fired and how far to lead the Target and exactly how long the shell should travel through the atmosphere before it is set to explode. If everything worked right the shell would explode very close to where the target should be.

None of that works at all without a target being tracked. The photo of the event actually proves that all the Guns were actually tracking the same Target.

What is interesting, is that some of the guns were not using the optical range finders but Radar range finders. These guns and searchlights were also firing on the same Target. So whatever it was, the crews could see it and the RADAR could also see it. The photo proves this.

It would be nice if the "war nerves" myth would stop being Parroted. It is a myth, there was some type of Target being fired upon.

Whoever fights monsters should see to it that in the process he does not become a monster. And if you gaze long enough into an abyss, the abyss will gaze back into you. - Friedrich Nietzsche

#64    Kludge808

Kludge808

    Forum god of all things

  • Member
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 1,741 posts
  • Joined:13 Oct 2009
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:Completely off the map

  • Proud Member of the Geriatric Squadron
    Proud Member of the Thinking Class

Posted 25 January 2014 - 12:07 PM

Well, I see that's decided once and for all and my own experience with and knowledge of radar isn't needed.

Whirled Infamous Author and all around really strange person
Not a complete idiot.  Some pieces are missing.

One of UM's Happy Mutants

#65    Sir Wearer of Hats

Sir Wearer of Hats

    SCIENCE!

  • Member
  • 11,200 posts
  • Joined:08 Nov 2008
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:Queensland, Australia.

Posted 25 January 2014 - 12:24 PM

It's all well and good to say "they had a radar target" but I do seem to recall a flap in the 80s of radar picking up the "launch" of nuclear missiles from one side of the Cold War and the other side having to decide of it was Judgment Day or a technological SNAFU.
More then once even.

Radar's good. Radar's amazing. Radar isn't perfect. They picked something up and the firing started. What they picked up only history knows.

I must not fear. Fear is the Mind-Killer. It is the little death that brings total obliteration. I will face my fear.
I will permit it to pass over me and to move through me. And when it is gone I will turn the inner eye to see it's path.
When the fear is gone, there will be nothing.
Only I will remain.

#66    lost_shaman

lost_shaman

    Majestic 12 Operative

  • Member
  • 5,530 posts
  • Joined:11 Jul 2006
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:TEXAS

Posted 25 January 2014 - 12:54 PM

View PostKludge808, on 25 January 2014 - 12:07 PM, said:

Well, I see that's decided once and for all and my own experience with and knowledge of radar isn't needed.

Wow!

Do you have a problem with anything I've said so far?

Did you know I've left some things out and vauge just on purpose so someone who knows more than me can chime in?

Would you like to chime in here? Do you even know what I didn't say? Please enlighten us!

Whoever fights monsters should see to it that in the process he does not become a monster. And if you gaze long enough into an abyss, the abyss will gaze back into you. - Friedrich Nietzsche

#67    lost_shaman

lost_shaman

    Majestic 12 Operative

  • Member
  • 5,530 posts
  • Joined:11 Jul 2006
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:TEXAS

Posted 25 January 2014 - 01:01 PM

View PostSir Wearer of Hats, on 25 January 2014 - 12:24 PM, said:

It's all well and good to say "they had a radar target" but I do seem to recall a flap in the 80s of radar picking up the "launch" of nuclear missiles from one side of the Cold War and the other side having to decide of it was Judgment Day or a technological SNAFU.
More then once even.

Radar's good. Radar's amazing. Radar isn't perfect. They picked something up and the firing started. What they picked up only history knows.

It was infrared satelites not RADAR.

But who's counting?

Whoever fights monsters should see to it that in the process he does not become a monster. And if you gaze long enough into an abyss, the abyss will gaze back into you. - Friedrich Nietzsche

#68    Likely Guy

Likely Guy

    Undecided, mostly.

  • Member
  • 5,318 posts
  • Joined:09 May 2012
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:Likely, Canada

  • I might have been born yesterday but, I've been up all night.

Posted 25 January 2014 - 01:18 PM

View Postlost_shaman, on 25 January 2014 - 01:01 PM, said:



It was infrared satelites not RADAR.

But who's counting?

Infrared satellites, in 1942?

Edit: Okay, you're maybe talking about a different incident.

Edited by Likely Guy, 25 January 2014 - 01:20 PM.


#69    seeder

seeder

    Nut Cracker

  • Member
  • 10,593 posts
  • Joined:21 Nov 2012
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:UK. There if you need me

  • Never forget that only the weak fish swim with the stream, and a lie travels half way around the world while the truth is putting on its shoes.

Posted 25 January 2014 - 05:19 PM

Soo then, something was picked up, blasted at for a while, nothing came down except spent shells/bullets whatever... and nothing returned fire..

Shouldn't really be called a 'Battle' then should it? :lol:

Facts do not cease to exist because they are ignored
It's not the depth of the rabbit hole that bugs me... It's all the rabbit poop you stumble over on your way down...
“It's easier to fool people - than to convince them that they have been fooled.”  Mark Twain

"The tragedy of life is not that it ends so soon, but that we wait so long to begin it"

#70    DONTEATUS

DONTEATUS

    Forum Divinity

  • Member
  • 18,020 posts
  • Joined:15 Feb 2008
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:Planet TEXAS

Posted 25 January 2014 - 06:03 PM

It made for War time News ! So it sorta worked ! But for the few that had stuff come down upon them !

This is a Work in Progress!

#71    Professor Buzzkill

Professor Buzzkill

    Integrity is all we have

  • Member
  • 2,639 posts
  • Joined:20 Oct 2008
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:White Cloud

Posted 25 January 2014 - 07:11 PM

Wow. Have the skeptics given up on this one? I never thought I would see the day ...


#72    seeder

seeder

    Nut Cracker

  • Member
  • 10,593 posts
  • Joined:21 Nov 2012
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:UK. There if you need me

  • Never forget that only the weak fish swim with the stream, and a lie travels half way around the world while the truth is putting on its shoes.

Posted 25 January 2014 - 07:59 PM

View PostProfessor Buzzkill, on 25 January 2014 - 07:11 PM, said:

Wow. Have the skeptics given up on this one? I never thought I would see the day ...


What?  It wasnt even classed as an alien craft/UFO till 40 years after, and only then, by the fringe

Have a read of this

"As far as I could determine, this letter's late-1980's appearance was the earliest reference to anything UFO related happening at the Battle of Los Angeles. Since then, of course, innumerable references have appeared on the web.

Most UFO web sites discuss the battle and show the picture from the LA Times, describing the cloud of AAA smoke in the searchlights as a "large craft". But this was not the contemporary identification.

For more than 40 years, not a single person associated with the Battle of Los Angeles entertained any thoughts about extraterrestrial spacecraft or aliens, according to all available evidence (at least when you discard the hoaxed evidence).

The alien spacecraft angle is purely a post-hoc invention by modern promoters of UFO mythology.   :tu:

Then read the whole page
http://skeptoid.com/episodes/4171

Facts do not cease to exist because they are ignored
It's not the depth of the rabbit hole that bugs me... It's all the rabbit poop you stumble over on your way down...
“It's easier to fool people - than to convince them that they have been fooled.”  Mark Twain

"The tragedy of life is not that it ends so soon, but that we wait so long to begin it"

#73    seeder

seeder

    Nut Cracker

  • Member
  • 10,593 posts
  • Joined:21 Nov 2012
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:UK. There if you need me

  • Never forget that only the weak fish swim with the stream, and a lie travels half way around the world while the truth is putting on its shoes.

Posted 25 January 2014 - 08:13 PM

One more link showing 'the' real  headlines and images...do read if you like this story!

Another Good Story Ruined -- The Battle of Los Angeles

http://latimesblogs....os-angeles.html



.

Edited by seeder, 25 January 2014 - 08:24 PM.

Facts do not cease to exist because they are ignored
It's not the depth of the rabbit hole that bugs me... It's all the rabbit poop you stumble over on your way down...
“It's easier to fool people - than to convince them that they have been fooled.”  Mark Twain

"The tragedy of life is not that it ends so soon, but that we wait so long to begin it"

#74    Merc14

Merc14

    anti-woo magician

  • Member
  • 5,648 posts
  • Joined:03 Mar 2011
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:Virginia, USA

Posted 25 January 2014 - 08:25 PM

I think if you look at the non-retouched photo (below) alongside the two retouched photos, all available here http://framework.lat...of-l-a-1942/#/0 you'll see that the image in the crossing searchlights actually doesn't exist as we see it later.  An editor goes on to explain, in detail, how they painted the photos and made another negative for publication.

From the article:
This week I inspected the negatives from which the two versions were scanned at UCLA.
The non-retouched negative is very flat, the focus is soft and it looks underexposed. While I could not tell if  the negative was the original or a copy negative made from a print, it definitely showed the original scene before a print was retouched.

The second negative is a copy negative from a retouched print. Certain details, such as the white spots around the searchlights’ convergence, are exactly the same in both negatives.
In the retouched version, many light beams were lightened and widened with white paint, while other beams were eliminated.

In earlier years, it was common for newspapers to use artists to retouch images due to poor reproduction — basically 10 shades of gray if you were lucky.

Thus my conclusion:  the retouching was needed to reproduce the image. But man, I wish the retouching had been more faithful to the original. With our current standards, this image would not be published.
The Los Angeles Times published another retouched version of the image on Oct. 29, 1945. The white spots near the convergence of the searchlights are larger than in the 1942 version. This print is in The  Times’ library and is in poor condition.

Also, I can't find, anywhere, that radar was used to track a bogie at this event.  I may be wrong but would like to see a direct reference to radar tracking.  Radar was not being widely utilized at that time and was not well understood by the troops and commanders (see Pearl Harbor failure to utilize radar correctly).

The non-retouched photo:Attached File  1942.jpg   65.32K   12 downloads

Edited by Merc14, 25 January 2014 - 08:32 PM.

"Embrace the suck"

#75    DONTEATUS

DONTEATUS

    Forum Divinity

  • Member
  • 18,020 posts
  • Joined:15 Feb 2008
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:Planet TEXAS

Posted 25 January 2014 - 08:43 PM

Well in the documentary the Marines Blasted the Aliens back to from whince they came ,Right? :alien: :gun: :no:
Well It was a long night of partying !

This is a Work in Progress!





Also tagged with ufo, battle of l.a.

0 user(s) are reading this topic

0 members, 0 guests, 0 anonymous users