Posted 16 December 2012 - 04:21 PM
The physical effects of space travel is of major concern for long duration missions.
At least for ISS missions the voyage up and down is planned down to the last minute.
The article in the OP really only touches on the subject. Astronauts also frequently suffer vision problems after a long mission.
Imagine a mission to Mars. In the ISS, astronauts have room to exercise and move around. Incorporating that into a spaceflight to Mars would increase cost tremendously.
Then there's the health risks aside from just the effects of 0 g's. What if they get sick? As was done with Apollo missions, the astronauts went into isolation for a period before flight to protect against infectious disease. But there are thousands of things that can go wrong healthwise that are not related to any pathogens entering the body.
I can't see a manned mission to Mars happening until we see astronauts spending at least 18 months in the ISS, with few, if any, health concerns.
At the heart of science is an essential balance between two seemingly contradictory attitudes--an openness to new ideas, no matter how bizarre or counterintuitive they may be, and the most ruthless skeptical scrutiny of all ideas, old and new.
This is how deep truths are winnowed from deep nonsense. -- Carl Sagan