Mr-X Posted March 19, 2005 #1 Share Posted March 19, 2005 When you hear the word pyramid, most people think...Egypt!! For those of you who love your history, may of read about the pyramids in Mexico!!! But what about these... Why are there 3 major pyramid sites...?? Why are they so far away from eachother? These cultures never mixed remember... What were the Chinese thinking when they built these...? Or did they? Chinese pyramids Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
marduk Posted March 19, 2005 #2 Share Posted March 19, 2005 http://www.hallofmaat.com/read.php?1,31547...5474#msg-315474 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Ashley-Star*Child Posted March 19, 2005 #3 Share Posted March 19, 2005 Ones of the same origin who gave out the scientific and mathematical knowledge to build them as those who built the Egyptian ones. Those again being the angels of Enoch. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Adramaleck Posted March 19, 2005 #4 Share Posted March 19, 2005 Ones of the same origin who gave out the scientific and mathematical knowledge to build them as those who built the Egyptian ones. Those again being the angels of Enoch. 531760[/snapback] I'm under the impression that 'god' and 'angels' are beings from another planet. They're always noted as being, coming above - and the technologically ignorant could very easily considered these beings gods, angels. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
marduk Posted March 19, 2005 #5 Share Posted March 19, 2005 The stone age tribes of the amazon don't believe that We are gods when we occaisonally fly in by helicopter. Why should we think our ancestors were primitive. Theres a big difference between technologically primitive and gullible. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Ashley-Star*Child Posted March 19, 2005 #6 Share Posted March 19, 2005 They are not beings from another planet in the 'alien/ufo' sense of the word. God created those planets. Technology doesn't make someone a god. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Mad Manfred Posted March 19, 2005 #7 Share Posted March 19, 2005 Uh huh. Angels and Aliens OR maybe, just maybe, its a coincidence? Triangles being the easiest ancient structure to make? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Bio-Mage Posted March 19, 2005 #8 Share Posted March 19, 2005 Not the easiest but the shape was definetely well known. Thats why the pyramids are so rare as major structures Manfred. Are there any details on the architectural design specifics for these pyramids? Do they match the geometrical arrangement and perfection of the Egyptian ones? Draw lines on the world map and see if the 3 sites form a perfect triangle ( ). By the way there are small pyramids in Greece too. They were built on top of hill near some of the cities and used to gather moisture and funnel it through pipes into the city as a water supply. Not a big thing but I thought to mention that Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Ashley-Star*Child Posted March 19, 2005 #9 Share Posted March 19, 2005 (edited) Manfred, they are not just 'triangles' they are an elaborate pyramid shape, with perfect mathamatical proportions which line up with a constellation, and did originally shine with their limestone coating which has been taken off and re-used for many of the buildings that now stand in that area. The Egyptian ones that is. Still, these follow the same form. Edited March 19, 2005 by Ashley-Star*Child Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Essan Posted March 19, 2005 #10 Share Posted March 19, 2005 Although described as pyramids, I think these chinese burial tombs are actually closer in concept to the bronze age tumuli found in Britain. For starters, they're covered in earth (some even have trees growing on them). The pyramid shape is more by accident than design. There's a good article about them here Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Kryso Posted March 19, 2005 #11 Share Posted March 19, 2005 Personally I’ve been to the Egyptian pyramids, and been to over eight different sites in Mexico including the famous Avenue of the Dead with its Sun and Moon pyramids. Personally, after walking on them, apart from the obvious shapes they have hardly anything in common. In the Mexican case it’s the easiest means to build a tall structure, wide at the bottom and getting smaller towards the top. Just outside Mexico City. Oh and a point of intrest, the pyramids of Teotihuacan (just outside Mexico City) rise as high as twenty-story buildings; the largest in the world! And trust me, it is as big as it looks and it takes a long time to climb to its top. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Mad Manfred Posted March 19, 2005 #12 Share Posted March 19, 2005 Ok...so its not a coincidence. *eats his words* needs salt Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
marduk Posted March 19, 2005 #13 Share Posted March 19, 2005 (edited) Yes at first look the evidence is overwhelming isn't it. You're thinking how can these sites NOT be connected. But this is as I have been pointing out to the guys here who believe all that they read or seen in a book because they've heard of the author. In this case for instance the author has gone a long way to make sure no one says "ah but where is the scale of each site and have those angles been measured ?" So because of their shortsightedness I get another £1,000,000 form my publisher and hit the best sellers list. Hancock and Sitchin are very guilty of tricks of the trade like this. They do it all the time and nobody who wants to believe will notice, That'd be like admitting you were wrong to yourself Hard to face if you've shot your mouth off claiming that what you believe is the whole and absolute truth here endeth the lesson Edited March 19, 2005 by marduk Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Conspiracy Posted March 23, 2005 #14 Share Posted March 23, 2005 well i think that triangle shapes are easier for pyramids then circles.. imagine a circle pyramid Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Dando Kast Posted March 23, 2005 #15 Share Posted March 23, 2005 The pyramids in China weren't originally covered in earth.... the jungle took them in over time....... Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Essan Posted March 23, 2005 #16 Share Posted March 23, 2005 The pyramids in China weren't originally covered in earth.... the jungle took them in over time....... 537586[/snapback] Can you verify that? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Conspiracy Posted March 23, 2005 #17 Share Posted March 23, 2005 The pyramids in China weren't originally covered in earth.... the jungle took them in over time....... 537586[/snapback] Can you verify that? 537861[/snapback] well think about it, these pyramids are near forests, dont you think they will eventually take over and cover the pyramids? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
marduk Posted March 23, 2005 #18 Share Posted March 23, 2005 The pyramids in China weren't originally covered in earth.... the jungle took them in over time....... 537586[/snapback] Can you verify that? 537861[/snapback] well think about it, these pyramids are near forests, dont you think they will eventually take over and cover the pyramids? 538380[/snapback] well think about it. Don't you mean "lets speculate endlessly without resorting to any facts" Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Celumnaz Posted March 23, 2005 #19 Share Posted March 23, 2005 woah, I thought it'd be easy to find proof that forests and jungles grow... but a google brought me nothing helpful... all global warming propaganda so... maybe forests and jungles don't grow? heh Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
marduk Posted March 23, 2005 #20 Share Posted March 23, 2005 I googled the same thing and discovered that in ideal situations forests can expand by as much as 1% per year Of course thats only Ideal situations You're not going to get an answer to this question without taking into account the climate of the time the type of forest The human factor The rainfall The soil etc etc the list is endless Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
robloc93 Posted March 23, 2005 #21 Share Posted March 23, 2005 well i think that triangle shapes are easier for pyramids then circles.. imagine a circle pyramid 537557[/snapback] Uh....then it wouldn't be a pyramid. It would be called a dome Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
marduk Posted March 23, 2005 #22 Share Posted March 23, 2005 (edited) Pity you weren't around to explain that to the Cuicuilcans when they built this ladies and gentlemen I give you The Circular "Pyramid" Of Cuicuilco The high rise buildings that can be seen in the far left of the picture are in mexico city CUICUILCO: MEXICO'S MYSTERIOUS PYRAMID All experts agree that the Cuicuilco pyramid is the oldest structure in the Anahuac Valley, which houses modern Mexico City, and the very first monumental construction in the Americas. Disagreements as to its antiquity and the people who built it continue to this very day. Official records state that the Cuicuilco structures can be no older than 600 B.C., but revisionist figures claim the structure was built between 8,000 to 10,000 years ago, thus making it almost as old as the "Tepexpan Man," the earliest prehistoric dweller found in Mesoamerica. Cuicuilco measures some 17 meters (56 feet) in height and has a diameter of 115 meters (380 feet). A series of ramps provided access to its uppermost tier, which housed a temple with a statue of Huehueteotl, the "Old God of Fire," the first deity worshipped on this continent. The mighty circular pyramid is surrounded by smaller structures and rectangular buildings with well-finished floors which must have been houses. Edited March 23, 2005 by marduk Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
robloc93 Posted March 23, 2005 #23 Share Posted March 23, 2005 Pity you weren't around to explain that to the Cuicuilcans when they built this ladies and gentlemen I give you The Circular "Pyramid" Of Cuicuilco The high rise buildings that can be seen in the far left of the picture are in mexico city CUICUILCO: MEXICO'S MYSTERIOUS PYRAMID All experts agree that the Cuicuilco pyramid is the oldest structure in the Anahuac Valley, which houses modern Mexico City, and the very first monumental construction in the Americas. Disagreements as to its antiquity and the people who built it continue to this very day. Official records state that the Cuicuilco structures can be no older than 600 B.C., but revisionist figures claim the structure was built between 8,000 to 10,000 years ago, thus making it almost as old as the "Tepexpan Man," the earliest prehistoric dweller found in Mesoamerica. Cuicuilco measures some 17 meters (56 feet) in height and has a diameter of 115 meters (380 feet). A series of ramps provided access to its uppermost tier, which housed a temple with a statue of Huehueteotl, the "Old God of Fire," the first deity worshipped on this continent. The mighty circular pyramid is surrounded by smaller structures and rectangular buildings with well-finished floors which must have been houses. 538516[/snapback] Well the base is circular but not the pyramid it self.My grandma lives about an hour away from there so I should know. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Dando Kast Posted March 23, 2005 #24 Share Posted March 23, 2005 (edited) Can you verify that? Instead of me going through a bunch of searching to verify it you should do some research to see why I say that..... but the base is that when the forests and jungles start to grow on these structures they create a way for earth and other materials to start building up on them (taking thousands of years of course). Animals could leave dirt and spores they carry and the wind can cause spores to land there as well. Due to this after there is enough dirt for something to sprout it will and grow from there.... look at the pyramids in Mexico.... before we cut most of the jungle away all you seen was trees and a hill....... or maybe the people had done it at some point in history... Edited March 23, 2005 by Black Ops Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Kryso Posted March 23, 2005 #25 Share Posted March 23, 2005 well i think that triangle shapes are easier for pyramids then circles.. imagine a circle pyramid 537557[/snapback] In Mexico City, Mexico there is in fact a completely round pyramid called TENOCHTITLAN 'Lake Texcoco', which is in fact an Aztec ALTAR! And it was discovered in 1982 when they were excavating Mexico City's extensive SUBWAY SYSTEM to the Zocalo (Main Square). The typical Aztec Style Circular Temple is dedicated to the wind God EHECATL or COATLICUE the Earth Goddess. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now