synchronomy, on 25 September 2012 - 12:53 PM, said:
Rocket engines currently in use work in both atmospheric and space environments.
Why don't you fire your idea off to NASA for evaluation. They usually reply to such suggestions.
NASA already has significant work underway on alternate propulsion systems by their private sector contractors. You will probably find research on your idea is well underway, or has already been deemed unfeasible and has been abandoned.
Not really what I am talking about, which is conventional travel, rockets provide lift. It goes in one direction very fast. It would be expensive to modify the design to allow conventional travel, which is why we have rockets, and we have planes. A plane requires lift, where a rocket uses thrust. The principal is quite different as I understand it. Something "hybrid" that manipulates the atmosphere, and sound waves do just that, may have the potential to reach further. I do not know if it would work, but by gum it is an interesting proposal.
Yes, I know that NASA has several designs in progress, and in use. NASA's deep space 1 used ion propulsion. I have actually exchanged emails with Dr David Morrison, the senior astrobiologist at NASA, but why bother these busy people when we have our very own NASA man on board, that being MID? What more could one ask?
It is not my idea, I just believe it has great potential. Not sure how you got that impression.