Monster-Finder Posted December 7, 2003 #1 Share Posted December 7, 2003 Now remember those who hate me, will not see it. And only a few of my fans will see it. But mothers with kids --- they all see it! How about YEW?????????????? Oh -- do not forget to practice yourv yocks and primitive guffahs... One,two,three--- YOCK,YOCK, Yowl!!!!!!!! Descend into insane laugher.......... Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Monster-Finder Posted December 7, 2003 Author #2 Share Posted December 7, 2003 NOTE!!!!!!!!! Then crack of the a** of the kid is OUT OF LINE with the crack of the a** of momma. See it? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
shirini Posted December 7, 2003 #3 Share Posted December 7, 2003 i see it! here is a word of advice, if you want us to see the images you've captured, you need to get a better camara or use better photo paper. I have looked at all of the photo's you have posted, here and on your site, and this is the first time i have seen anything! p.s. it looks like you zoom in or inlarge your photos', don't do that. it makes harder for us to see the abnormality! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
bathory Posted December 7, 2003 #4 Share Posted December 7, 2003 if i'm not mistaken thats the Paterson Gimlin film (sp) which means he didn't take it Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
shirini Posted December 7, 2003 #5 Share Posted December 7, 2003 hey thanks B..... Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Monster-Finder Posted December 7, 2003 Author #6 Share Posted December 7, 2003 i see it! here is a word of advice, if you want us to see the images you've captured, you need to get a better camara or use better photo paper. I have looked at all of the photo's you have posted, here and on your site, and this is the first time i have seen anything! p.s. it looks like you zoom in or inlarge your photos', don't do that. it makes harder for us to see the abnormality! Please be aware that the moderator DOES NOT ALLOW large file photos on this forum. Did you know????? Or do oyu want your money back?? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Fluffybunny Posted December 7, 2003 #7 Share Posted December 7, 2003 This is pretty interesting stuff MF. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Kermit2035 Posted December 7, 2003 #8 Share Posted December 7, 2003 I am new to the forums! Looks like you got a better camera. Still my $3.99 Disposable camera takes clearer shots. I am not out to criticize, just starting the facts. One simple question Monster-Finder...What type of camera do you use?? I will make sure not that buy it. But really I am sure many would like to know. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Fluffybunny Posted December 7, 2003 #9 Share Posted December 7, 2003 This is not Monster Finders filmwork. This is a frame from the famous Patterson film...been around a long time. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Kermit2035 Posted December 7, 2003 #10 Share Posted December 7, 2003 Thanks for the clarification. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Anirbas Posted December 7, 2003 #11 Share Posted December 7, 2003 Um yall know that that film was debunked.... it was a complete hoax Linkie It's in the 12th paragraph...... Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Fluffybunny Posted December 7, 2003 #12 Share Posted December 7, 2003 I had heard that the deathbed recant was a lie, started by folks that were looking to discredit the film. I don't know if that was the case or not, but by doing some reading I find some sites saying that he never made the confession, and a couple that did. I am not sure either way... Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Magikman Posted December 7, 2003 #13 Share Posted December 7, 2003 (edited) Actually that's not true, Sabrina. Patterson never admitted to hoaxing the film, its just been a hotly debated topic among those who claim to know much more than the general public. As an addendum, a while back I found a web site that shows a portion of the Patterson Bigfoot film. It's shown in a split screen comparison, the picture is small and the video is not very clear. I only have a 56k modem so that may be part of the problem. Here's a link for the website; http://www.n2.net/prey/bigfoot/index.html Just click on the video link on the left side and it will take you to a listing of available bigfoot video's. You want the one that shows the comparison. Magikman Edited December 7, 2003 by Magikman Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Anirbas Posted December 7, 2003 #14 Share Posted December 7, 2003 LOL @ FB & Magikman - you beat me to editing my post - I realized after I said it that there was something wrong - that link I provided says it all.....I wish it was real but I just kinda doubt it was......BTW Magik I will check that out sounds pretty cool Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Monster-Finder Posted December 7, 2003 Author #15 Share Posted December 7, 2003 i see it! here is a word of advice, if you want us to see the images you've captured, you need to get a better camara or use better photo paper. I have looked at all of the photo's you have posted, here and on your site, and this is the first time i have seen anything! p.s. it looks like you zoom in or inlarge your photos', don't do that. it makes harder for us to see the abnormality! Amazed you guys do not realize it is VERY HARD to film bigfoot, and only one or two people have EVER DONE IT, in all of HISTORY. Did you THink they, or I have any CONTROL over it??????? Bonk! Bonk! Bonk! BACK TO YOUR COMIC BOOKS AND TV CARTOONS! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Monster-Finder Posted December 7, 2003 Author #16 Share Posted December 7, 2003 I am new to the forums! Looks like you got a better camera. Still my $3.99 Disposable camera takes clearer shots. I am not out to criticize, just starting the facts. One simple question Monster-Finder...What type of camera do you use?? I will make sure not that buy it. But really I am sure many would like to know. I did not take this photo. It is part of the 951 frame Patterson-Gimlin Film of 1967, and I am the foremost analyst of it. See more on http://www.bigfoot.org best camera is Kodak k-100 camera for 16mm film. Or use super 8mm film camera, not video. Then wait 30 yrs... Forget video. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Monster-Finder Posted December 7, 2003 Author #17 Share Posted December 7, 2003 Um yall know that that film was debunked.... it was a complete hoax Linkie It's in the 12th paragraph...... Film withstands all debunking, year after year. This means ALL. This includes you, poster. bonk!!!!!!!!!!! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Monster-Finder Posted December 7, 2003 Author #18 Share Posted December 7, 2003 I had heard that the deathbed recant was a lie, started by folks that were looking to discredit the film. I don't know if that was the case or not, but by doing some reading I find some sites saying that he never made the confession, and a couple that did. I am not sure either way... NONE of you people know SQUAT about this field. I knew Ray Wallace IN PERSON. This does not mean email, kiddies. He was a genial old liar. His family also. Now WHY DO YOU ACCEPT **** IN THE NEWSPAPER JUST BECAUSE SOMEONE WROTE IT DOWN??????? WHY????????????? "Uh, gee, I read it in the paper...duh...." bONK! BONK! BONK! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
shirini Posted December 7, 2003 #19 Share Posted December 7, 2003 i see it! here is a word of advice, if you want us to see the images you've captured, you need to get a better camara or use better photo paper. I have looked at all of the photo's you have posted, here and on your site, and this is the first time i have seen anything! p.s. it looks like you zoom in or inlarge your photos', don't do that. it makes harder for us to see the abnormality! Amazed you guys do not realize it is VERY HARD to film bigfoot, and only one or two people have EVER DONE IT, in all of HISTORY. Did you THink they, or I have any CONTROL over it??????? Bonk! Bonk! Bonk! BACK TO YOUR COMIC BOOKS AND TV CARTOONS! Why are you quoting me? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Phantom Posted December 7, 2003 #20 Share Posted December 7, 2003 The "bonks" are getting irritating. No more of that, please. I bid you. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Naveed Posted December 7, 2003 #21 Share Posted December 7, 2003 Definitly an interesting still. It does look like a baby, and could very well be, but I still leave room for reasonable doubt. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Thistle Posted December 7, 2003 #22 Share Posted December 7, 2003 QUOTE "Now WHY DO YOU ACCEPT **** IN THE NEWSPAPER " "JUST BECAUSE SOMEONE WROTE IT DOWN???????" "WHY?????????????" Monster Finder........, well said. Now, why should we accept that anything you say is true ?..........just because YOU wrote it down ? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
FireFrog Posted December 7, 2003 #23 Share Posted December 7, 2003 This is actually, something interesting... What? A post where Monster-Finder actually gave us something useful? Hard to believe I know, but he's still up to his old antics. Question... do you think someone could pull up some more stills from the footage and see if you can see the baby bigfoot is on its back in those too? Now time for some good old quoting: NONE of you people know SQUAT about this field. Ouch. We know about this field you fool, we just don't experience it first hand, please stop demeaning us and hear us out, or just leave. I knew Ray Wallace IN PERSON. That's actually interesting... providing its not another lie. This does not mean email, kiddies. Why with all the jokes on our part? Are you trying to prove your superior or something?? He was a genial old liar. You two have something in common then Now WHY DO YOU ACCEPT **** IN THE NEWSPAPER Cool your jets hot shot... people having been mentioning the fact that he claimed it was a hoax in the paper, not necessarily saying that they believe it. If you read on further you'll find most of us here are still strong believers in the old Gimli Footage (well, those that heard of it before which would exclude maybe one or two in this thread). JUST BECAUSE SOMEONE WROTE IT DOWN??????? As thistle stated, you write a whole bunch of things down too that are less plausable than that particular article... why should we believe you? "Uh, gee, I read it in the paper...duh...." bONK! BONK! BONK! Please stop your retarded bonking and joking about... we're trying to stay serious in this thread... Amazed you guys do not realize it is VERY HARD to film bigfoot, and only one or two people have EVER DONE IT, in all of HISTORY. Yes, yes we know that... where did any of us say this wasn't hard? Did you THink they, or I have any CONTROL over it??????? See above. Bonk! Bonk! Bonk! Would you quit it with the bonking already? BACK TO YOUR COMIC BOOKS AND TV CARTOONS! While of course I myself do watch a lot of these (gimme a break, I'm still a kid) the majority of users on this board are serious adults who I'm sure don't apreaciate you constantly trying to walk all over (even though your futile attempts are hilarious to watch). Oh, and don't ignore me because I'm an annonymous user... once again I'm Thomas J Gendle and I'd like a reply and prefer if you didn't hide away from this one --FireFrog (again... Thomas J Gendle) Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
YBC Posted December 7, 2003 #24 Share Posted December 7, 2003 hey i was on that site that MM talked about and i was looking at the redwoods video anyone know the story behind it? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Fluffybunny Posted December 7, 2003 #25 Share Posted December 7, 2003 NONE of you people know SQUAT about this field. I knew Ray Wallace IN PERSON. This does not mean email, kiddies. He was a genial old liar. His family also. Now WHY DO YOU ACCEPT **** IN THE NEWSPAPER JUST BECAUSE SOMEONE WROTE IT DOWN??????? WHY????????????? "Uh, gee, I read it in the paper...duh...." bONK! BONK! BONK! MF, why are you quoting me? I am saying I thought the recant was not true. You are so set to disagree with me, that you disagreed with me when I was trying to support your side of the story. Eeek. Now WHY DO YOU ACCEPT **** IN THE NEWSPAPER Because you haven't been able to find a real publisher for your book yet...I keep hoping beyond hope that YOUR truth shall set me free in the ways of the paranormal. Somehow publishers seem to be shying away from you. hmmm...I wonder why? "Uh, gee, I read it in the paper...duh...." I love your delivery. I bet Jerry Seinfeld is concerned at your command of humor. Mr Beckjord, Unlike some who are able to devine paranormal information from Out of Body Experiences and dope trips, we do infact read to get our information. It is scary for you, I know. Books and newspapers are our friends. Are they always right? not always, but that is ok. We are smart and sober enough to decide for ourselves what information we are going to believe. Sometimes we even get that information from newspapers!!! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts