Still Waters Posted October 8, 2012 #1 Share Posted October 8, 2012 Art often confronts questions of life, death and the human condition. Now one introspective painter has delved even further into existential themes. He creates each of his works entirely from his own blood. The tattooed 30-year-old describes his figures as being painted with 'what could be described as "liquid flesh"'. http://www.dailymail...ints-BLOOD.html Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
wolfknight Posted October 8, 2012 #2 Share Posted October 8, 2012 OK. That is a strange as hell. Real freak there for sure. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Ever Learning Posted October 8, 2012 #3 Share Posted October 8, 2012 a man who paints pictures badly with his blood is mad? a man who paints pictures with his blood well an eccentric? 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
+ouija ouija Posted October 8, 2012 #4 Share Posted October 8, 2012 Well, I guess it's one step more acceptable than the guy who 'paints' with his own faeces . The drawings are pretty good. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Mnemonix Posted October 8, 2012 #5 Share Posted October 8, 2012 Well, I guess it's one step more acceptable than the guy who 'paints' with his own faeces . The drawings are pretty good. There's a guy who does that now? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
+ouija ouija Posted October 8, 2012 #6 Share Posted October 8, 2012 There's a guy who does that now? I might be misleading you. It was quite a few years ago when I saw him on the news. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Bling Posted October 8, 2012 #7 Share Posted October 8, 2012 He's a great artist! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
coldethyl Posted October 8, 2012 #8 Share Posted October 8, 2012 (edited) No question he's talented but the 'reasoning' behind putting his on blood into his art? Good grief. edited to say: KISS already did this back in the 70's with a comic. Edited October 8, 2012 by coldethyl Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
schizoidwoman Posted October 8, 2012 #9 Share Posted October 8, 2012 I might be misleading you. It was quite a few years ago when I saw him on the news. I think Lennie Lee did; did Gilbert and George do something similar too? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
+ouija ouija Posted October 8, 2012 #10 Share Posted October 8, 2012 I think Lennie Lee did; did Gilbert and George do something similar too? Gilbert & George did poo-art?!!!!!! Surely not? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
tipotep Posted October 8, 2012 #11 Share Posted October 8, 2012 Not the best idea in the world , blood doesn't last all that long when its used as a " ink " or " Paint " , not compared to some good old artist paint . TiP. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Ashotep Posted October 8, 2012 #12 Share Posted October 8, 2012 That is kind of creepy but poo-paintings that's nasty. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Hasina Posted October 9, 2012 #13 Share Posted October 9, 2012 I will be the first person to paint with spit, and if you say you can't see it, you insult my art! To be honest, I just don't get art nowadays. His art's good, sure, but it's nothing special, the only thing that makes it special is the medium he uses. Whoopdeedo. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Simbi Laveau Posted October 9, 2012 #14 Share Posted October 9, 2012 That's better than the one that uses poo . Remember the KISS comic ? The huge deal about that was,the band all had vials of their bloods drawn,and it was dumped into the red ink used in printing. Then they could say,it was printed with their blood . Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
K_Bonita Posted October 12, 2012 #15 Share Posted October 12, 2012 Amazing artist...but blood?. Give's me shiver's just thinking how he took the blood out *hates needles* Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
schizoidwoman Posted October 12, 2012 #16 Share Posted October 12, 2012 Gilbert & George did poo-art?!!!!!! Surely not? I thought the bodily fluids in their Naked **** Pictures were real... It's a bit icky to think about! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Orcseeker Posted October 12, 2012 #17 Share Posted October 12, 2012 a man who paints pictures badly with his blood is mad? a man who paints pictures with his blood well an eccentric? Well I take it you mean badly as in scrawl? A madman is not in control of his actions and just does so. Whereas this guy can obviously paint quite well. I would definitely classify him as eccentric. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
+ouija ouija Posted October 12, 2012 #18 Share Posted October 12, 2012 I thought the bodily fluids in their Naked **** Pictures were real... It's a bit icky to think about! *flatly refuses to think about it* 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now