Jump to content




Welcome to Unexplained Mysteries! Please sign in or create an account to start posting and to access a host of extra features.


* * * * * 1 votes

Who or what created God?


  • Please log in to reply
145 replies to this topic

#61    Left-Field

Left-Field

    Government Agent

  • Banned
  • 3,489 posts
  • Joined:15 Aug 2009

Posted 01 August 2012 - 05:27 AM

View PostRlyeh, on 01 August 2012 - 04:48 AM, said:

You're just repeating yourself now. I've already pointed out using an attribute possessed by a fictional character, only requires the acknowledgement of the attribute.

Of course I'm repeating myself. I'm doing so because what I have stated is true. If you ask me the same questions with different wording then you are going to get an answer that I have already given you.

If the attribute one is acknowledging is only attributed to something that the person using that attribute claims is nothing more than fantasy then they are contradicting their belief that the god (or any other being / item they believe is fictional) possessing the attribute doesn't exist when they rely upon it to reason one of their own beliefs.

There really is no denying this as it makes zero sense for one to claim something does not exist only to then acknowledge its possible existance as a means of reasoning their own beliefs on something else that cannot be explained.

And another thing I've already stated, which apparently bears repeating, is that if a person clings to a certain belief that cannot be scientifically explained their belief in that thing becomes a matter of faith - unless it is something they witnessed with their own eyes that wasn't some sort of magic trick.

Regarding the universe's origins, however, it is obvious that no one witnessed its occurrence or it having always been.

These statements hold true time and time again.

Edited by Angel Left Wing, 01 August 2012 - 05:29 AM.


#62    Rlyeh

Rlyeh

    Omnipotent Entity

  • Member
  • 9,452 posts
  • Joined:01 Jan 2011
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:The sixth circle

  • Build a man a fire, and he'll be warm for a day. Set a man on fire, and he'll be warm for the rest of his life. - Terry Pratchett

Posted 01 August 2012 - 05:57 AM

View PostAngel Left Wing, on 01 August 2012 - 05:27 AM, said:

If the attribute one is acknowledging is only attributed to something that the person using that attribute claims is nothing more than fantasy then they are contradicting their belief that the god (or any other being / item they believe is fictional) possessing the attribute doesn't exist when they rely upon it to reason one of their own beliefs.
You're confusing the being's non-existence with the attribute's non-existence.


#63    Left-Field

Left-Field

    Government Agent

  • Banned
  • 3,489 posts
  • Joined:15 Aug 2009

Posted 01 August 2012 - 06:35 AM

View PostRlyeh, on 01 August 2012 - 05:57 AM, said:

You're confusing the being's non-existence with the attribute's non-existence.

No, I'm not.

Tell me of a being or item which exists which is scientifically acknowledged as real with a scientific explanation proving the stated being or item has always existed and always will, or has been produced out of nothing.

Waspie Dwarf's statement would be like me stating:

"I have reasoned that since Superman can fire laser beams from his eyes then it's possible human beings and animals are capable of doing the same."

Are you going to tell me that is a well reasoned belief reached on my behalf? Are you going to tell me that although Superman is fictitious the attribute of firing laser beams from his eyes is real?

To an atheist, God is just as fictitious as Superman is.

Edited by Angel Left Wing, 01 August 2012 - 06:39 AM.


#64    Rlyeh

Rlyeh

    Omnipotent Entity

  • Member
  • 9,452 posts
  • Joined:01 Jan 2011
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:The sixth circle

  • Build a man a fire, and he'll be warm for a day. Set a man on fire, and he'll be warm for the rest of his life. - Terry Pratchett

Posted 01 August 2012 - 06:46 AM

View PostAngel Left Wing, on 01 August 2012 - 06:35 AM, said:


No, I'm not.

Tell me of a being or item which exists which is sientifically acknowledged as real with a scientific explanation proving the stated being or item has always existed and always will, or has been produced out of nothing.

Waspie Dwarf's statement would be like me stating:

"I have reasoned that since Superman can fire laser beams from his eyes then I conclude that it's possible human beings and animals are capable of doing the same."

Are you going to tell me that is a well reasoned thought reached on my behalf? Are you going to tell me that although Superman is fictitious the attribute of firing laser beams from his eyes is real?
These lasers are artificial. If you had said about a robot or something, it would've been more accurate and you don't need to believe in superman.

Quote

To an atheist, God is just as fictitious as Superman is.
To an atheist, however eternity (or a similar concept) isn't necessarily fictional.


#65    Left-Field

Left-Field

    Government Agent

  • Banned
  • 3,489 posts
  • Joined:15 Aug 2009

Posted 01 August 2012 - 07:07 AM

View PostRlyeh, on 01 August 2012 - 06:46 AM, said:

These lasers are artificial. If you had said about a robot or something, it would've been more accurate and you don't need to believe in superman.

There is a scientific explanation as to how and why a robot (or weapon I suppose) can be created that is capable of firing laser beams.

There is no scientific explanation as to how a living creature (human, animal, or plant) could possess such an attribute and that is why the Superman scenario is more accurate than you robot scenario.

There is no scientific explanation as to how something could have always been and always will be, or how something can be produced out of nothing.

With that being the case, for anyone to believe in those things (or "attributes" if you prefer to call them that) it requires them to base it upon faith such a thing could exist based upon those attributes - it is no different than people requiring faith to believe God's existence can be explained by those very same attributes.

View PostRlyeh, on 01 August 2012 - 06:46 AM, said:

To an atheist, however eternity (or a similar concept) isn't necessarily fictional.

If they believe something can be eternal then, yet again, they hold that belief based on nothing but faith because neither science (or anything else) provides and explanation as to how something could be eternal.

Edited by Angel Left Wing, 01 August 2012 - 07:09 AM.


#66    eight bits

eight bits

    ...

  • Member
  • 6,618 posts
  • Joined:24 May 2007

Posted 01 August 2012 - 10:37 AM

ALW

Quote

He is acknowledging God's existence in order to state why he believes the universe may be something that has always been and always will be.

Great, we're in agreement. What Waspie discussed was his appreciation of a possibility, that's what your may be means, that it is possible. He's right about that, too, it is possible, and that it is possible is of the character of fact, that is. tenable without regard to any possibilities that are inconsistent with it. His earlier belief in God is irrelevant to his appreciation of this possibility. Anyone else's belief in God is similarly irrelevant.

Quote

Having no belief in God or a higher being, however, is exclusively an atheist position

I have no belief in God or a higher being, and I am not an atheist. Pantheists don't believe that God is a higher being, and they're not atheists. Deists do not necessarily believe that God still exists, and they're not atheists; they don't even deny that a god created the Universe.

Quote

And if a person who does not believe in these gods, whether they are world-creators or not, bases their belief on anything upon the beliefs others have about these gods then they are contradicting their belief that such gods are mere fantasy.

That would depend upon what "bases their belief on" means in a particular case. In Waspie's story, it meant only that enlightenment came to him while he was contemplating the logical soundenss of someone else's assertions about God. All that Waspie acknolwedged was that assertions were made. Their truth or falsehood is irrelevant to their unsoundness.

I don't see anything in the rest of your post that doesn't depend on the points already addressed.

Posted Image

#67    dj_nubla

dj_nubla

    Alien Embryo

  • Member
  • Pip
  • 13 posts
  • Joined:08 Jul 2012

Posted 01 August 2012 - 01:18 PM

The Book of Genesis right from the start specifically stated that there is more than 1 God.


#68    Turecast

Turecast

    Alien Embryo

  • Member
  • Pip
  • 42 posts
  • Joined:16 Jan 2011
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:Ohio

  • Some say the dark is Evil and the light is Good
    but one thing is true neither can exist without one another -Turecast

Posted 01 August 2012 - 04:54 PM

God created man on the sixth day Man returned the favor


#69    OMagus

OMagus

    Alien Embryo

  • Member
  • Pip
  • 4 posts
  • Joined:28 Aug 2011
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:Northern California

Posted 24 August 2012 - 06:57 AM

Who or what created God?  I think this is one of those eternal questions that humans will always ask. I seem to recall that this is the second thread generated by it right here just in the past few months. I hope this one can be resurrected, because it got pretty interesting.

In my view, almost all the posts approached it from a basically Western perspective, i.e. the theology of the Abrahamic religions intercalated with modern science. My own perspective is more Eastern-oriented, i.e. the worldview of the Dharmic religions, which today has thoroughly infiltrated the West as well, and has likewise been influenced by scientific ideas, notably quantum theory.

The single biggest difference in the Eastern/Dharmic POV is that the question is not just a matter of speculation, rational analysis, or even intuition, but that the answer can be found by direct experience of the realities at issue.

View PostStarMountainKid, on 30 July 2012 - 02:17 AM, said:

God may exist beyond or separate from space and time. If this is true, God exists 'outside' of time and space, so asking this question would be meaningless.

I believe it's true, but it's not meaningless if an individual human being can attain a state beyond space and time and become one with God. When such an individual returned to the mundane realm, he or she might communicate what they had learned to others who were open to the scoop. In fact this is the entire basis of the Dharmic religions, and the source of the most complex philosophic systems ever created. I've studied this for many years and have had some enlightening experiences myself, and I feel I have lots to share. This might be a good thread to do it in, but I'll wait to see if anyone is interested. Meanwhile, I'll just quote the one post that expressed a POV similar to mine, at least in a basic, general sense:

View Postgentai, on 28 July 2012 - 11:39 AM, said:

i believe consciousness always existed but was unaware. like dreaming. it dreamed of something funny and became self aware through the sound / feeling of its own reaction. it thought of everything it could think of. and just when it thought it might last forever this way, it willed itself to shine like a star to start to see what it looks like. . . .



#70    Viviana98

Viviana98

    Paranormal Investigator

  • Closed
  • PipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 795 posts
  • Joined:03 Jul 2012
  • Gender:Not Selected

Posted 24 August 2012 - 07:24 AM

God was created by man. If God is real and is all powerful like he claims to be he would have created himself some hands and found some paper and a pen and wrote his own book.


#71    Orcseeker

Orcseeker

    Poltergeist

  • Member
  • 2,806 posts
  • Joined:15 Dec 2007
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:Australia

Posted 24 August 2012 - 09:24 PM

It's amazing how many people are so definite about how the most powerful being in the universe (or even universe clusters of a larger container etc, who knows) in which our existence is a tiny speck, came to be. The wise men of old said so? What do they know? Why would we even ever know this at all?


#72    BlazeWizard

BlazeWizard

    Alien Embryo

  • Member
  • Pip
  • 5 posts
  • Joined:23 Aug 2012

Posted 28 August 2012 - 01:54 AM

View PostOMagus, on 24 August 2012 - 06:57 AM, said:

Who or what created God?  I think this is one of those eternal questions that humans will always ask. I seem to recall that this is the second thread generated by it right here just in the past few months. I hope this one can be resurrected, because it got pretty interesting.

In my view, almost all the posts approached it from a basically Western perspective, i.e. the theology of the Abrahamic religions intercalated with modern science. My own perspective is more Eastern-oriented, i.e. the worldview of the Dharmic religions, which today has thoroughly infiltrated the West as well, and has likewise been influenced by scientific ideas, notably quantum theory.

The single biggest difference in the Eastern/Dharmic POV is that the question is not just a matter of speculation, rational analysis, or even intuition, but that the answer can be found by direct experience of the realities at issue.



I believe it's true, but it's not meaningless if an individual human being can attain a state beyond space and time and become one with God. When such an individual returned to the mundane realm, he or she might communicate what they had learned to others who were open to the scoop. In fact this is the entire basis of the Dharmic religions, and the source of the most complex philosophic systems ever created. I've studied this for many years and have had some enlightening experiences myself, and I feel I have lots to share. This might be a good thread to do it in, but I'll wait to see if anyone is interested. Meanwhile, I'll just quote the one post that expressed a POV similar to mine, at least in a basic, general sense:

"Who or what created God"

I find this question most interesting, especially the interactions between different religions from such varying cultures.
I think firstly we would have to ask which "god" the question is about. Which is strange to think that not only do people not believe in a single god but there are other gods to ask about since there are other religions.

If however we were to assume that there even is a god in the first place we would need to know which type of god we are referring to. I'll assume that it's the christian version of the old Hebrew mythologies. In which case I would say that whoever wrote those myths created it.

From a different angle, I have been reading about different dimensions lately (1st, 2nd, 3rd and the imaginings of 4th and so on) and I wonder how a being of a higher dimension than ours would appear to us. If the 3rd dimension that we are in is subject to change over time (and we view time progression a linear) then would a 4th dimensional being experience time differently?
Existing at all "times" simultaneously? Appearing to us to be godlike?

Perhaps there are many higher dimensional beings and that version of god is just telling us that they are the only one?
As for the universe, who knows? There was a "big bang" that appeared to start it all but what caused that bang?

My two cents anyway


#73    starchild1976

starchild1976

    Alien Embryo

  • Member
  • Pip
  • 83 posts
  • Joined:30 Aug 2012
  • Gender:Female
  • Location:texas

  • Truth is stranger than fiction.

Posted 30 August 2012 - 04:59 PM

Now that science is 99 percent certain as of this year the god particle does exist the world's leading astro physicist, Michio Kuku says this will allow us to question how god was created. I've always believed if we knew exactly who god was then we'd be asking who created god. Could it be god is infinite? God would have to be infinite, because we'd have to keep asking who created god and who created god who created god.


#74    Alannis

Alannis

    Alien Embryo

  • Member
  • Pip
  • 28 posts
  • Joined:07 Jul 2011
  • Gender:Not Selected

  • You can't walk on water without faith of a thousand suns.

    Im not going to tell you how to live your life i'm only going to suggest how you should.

Posted 17 November 2012 - 01:19 AM

Since I'm very gifted with open mindedness (sometimes I believe it a curse) I have thought on this. Someone had to create him. It's like humans and earth, we didn't just decide one day we want to become something someone made us into something. The same with God. He was born (yes I say born because of belief system get over it) and grew up just like us. What I'm trying to say is yes someone created God and then someone created that God it's a very long line and never ends just like time.


#75    Orcseeker

Orcseeker

    Poltergeist

  • Member
  • 2,806 posts
  • Joined:15 Dec 2007
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:Australia

Posted 17 November 2012 - 01:44 AM

View PostAlannis, on 17 November 2012 - 01:19 AM, said:

Since I'm very gifted with open mindedness (sometimes I believe it a curse) I have thought on this. Someone had to create him. It's like humans and earth, we didn't just decide one day we want to become something someone made us into something. The same with God. He was born (yes I say born because of belief system get over it) and grew up just like us. What I'm trying to say is yes someone created God and then someone created that God it's a very long line and never ends just like time.

But what of the creator of God? Was everything just from something that just was? It is a mind boggling thought.





0 user(s) are reading this topic

0 members, 0 guests, 0 anonymous users