People claiming ET starship VS people claiming man-made aircraft.
ok so in summary depending on what is being claimed determines whether the 'testimony' counts as evidence or not, correct?
also lets remove the words ET starship for a minute. Many people give a testimony about what they witnessed, if they think it was ET or not is opinion and irrelevant to the observation.
So these other witnesses claiming to have seen a low flying slow moving craft didnt really see what they say they saw and were actually seeing a formation of planes, how do we know this, well basically we have evidence to counter the testimonies......oh yeah what evidence is that...ummmm.....well.....a further testimony but this one actually counts as evidence. really?
anyhow bottom line do you agree that there is no evidence for plane formation for the 8.30 sighting?