TrueBeliever, on 28 October 2012 - 10:19 AM, said:
no, it's far more logical to believe in a report/investigation set up to fail

...
Actually.. I'd think it was more important to look logically at facts and science and proven stuff to thence determine what parts of the investigation are in dispute, and if you aren't an expert, consider deferring to those who are...
Quote
....and to call everyone with legit questions as to exactly what happened that day as crazy CT's.
WHO is calling this 'everyone' that? Who decided on the legitimacy of the questions? You? Or is this a wonderful example of a strawman?
Quote
I think there are crazy wackjobs both sides of this...
So wouldn't it be better to properly debate the issues and see if there is a truth to be found? Are you capable of identifying the wackjobs and how does the 'royal we' know
you aren't one?
Quote
...but to condemn people who don't just take the official word as the gospel truth is what is really ignorant and unintelligent.
"Condemn"??? Are they banned? Incarcerated? Prevented from having their say? Please elaborate. I hope you aren't referring to them being (perhaps harshly, but rightly) questioned about their interpretations and claims and whether they have the requisite knowledge or analytical ability..
Quote
most of you don't give a damn why/how 3,000 people were murdered.
Frankly, I think that is an absolutely disgusting thing to say. Handwaving and ugly ad hominem at its very worst.
Quote
YOU want to be right and win an argument.
So let me get this straight - you *don't* want to be right? And whatever side happens to
be right.. them winning the argument isn't a good thing?
I don't follow - I would have thought finding out what is right and winning the argument
on that basis was a good thing..
Quote
Some of us just want the damn TRUTH.
Gee,
really? Well,
I certainly wouldn't want that... {/sarcasm}
Quote
and anyone who thinks the 9/11 Commission gave them the truth, the whole truth and nothing but the truth is an ignorant fool IMO.
You are entitled to your opinion and your further vague and non-specific labeling of readers as fools.
So, hands up all those who think that
any commission could possibly come up with an absolute 100% detailed perfect 'truth'...?
Hmm, I see none of your 'fools' here..
TrueBeliever, please be specific. F
irst - tell us, in detail, what you think happened on 9/11. Then, outline the very best example you have of the 'lies' you are so adamant about and give us your logical, supported, scientific, verifiable refutation. For the record (and bringing this back on topic), I've offered a few comments about the OP's video here - do you have anything to say about those comments?
Do you think there is enough information gleanable from the video to come to any conclusions about exactly what might have happened?
Before you wade in, may I suggest you browse ..
this.. and if you aren't prepared to put in that sort of effort, please don't bother.