Slave2Fate, on 28 November 2012 - 03:41 PM, said:
Well that's a bit disappointing...
I expect both the initial report dramatizing the excitement of the data, and these recent reports downplaying it, will be found to be somewhat more polarized than the true reality.
Looking forward to the formal presentation, which I am confident will be somewhere in the gray zone between the two.
Confirmation of some organics molecules would be exciting enough.
Perhaps molecules commonly found in diatom fossils would be more exciting. Not necessarily confirming they are there, but more of a maybe they are if there are several molecules discovered.
Regardless of the data, it is a staggering technological achievement to have delivered such a complex vehicle like Curiosity to Mars.
Too bad there wasn't a couple of humans up there driving it...maybe someday.
I'm hopeful that Curiosity will discover something that will provide political motivation to back a manned mission in the near future.
The technology is doable...just need some cash (a lot)
edited for spelling and grammar
Edited by synchronomy, 28 November 2012 - 05:34 PM.
At the heart of science is an essential balance between two seemingly contradictory attitudes--an openness to new ideas, no matter how bizarre or counterintuitive they may be, and the most ruthless skeptical scrutiny of all ideas, old and new.
This is how deep truths are winnowed from deep nonsense. -- Carl Sagan