1528 replies to this topic

[mcrom901]

TheMacGuffin, on 18 November 2012 - 06:06 PM, said:

what is the source for that image?

http://www.hq.nasa.g...6-113-18339.jpg
http://www.hq.nasa.g...113-18339HR.jpg

http://spaceflight.n...6-113-18339.jpg
http://spaceflight.n...6-113-18339.jpg

http://www.lpi.usra....?AS16-113-18339
http://www.lpi.usra....m/magazine/?113

[TheMacGuffin]

There's another one here from Apollo 16.



Mission Apollo 16 on the Moon, 1972, dates: April 16-27. Astronaut Charles Duke photographed collecting lunar samples at Station 1. No explanation has been given for the object seen behind the astronaut.


http://www.ufoera.co...1190310694.html

chrome://newtabhttp//www.ufoera.com/images/ufo/apollo-16-ufo_112.jpg

[TheMacGuffin]

mcrom901, on 18 November 2012 - 06:40 PM, said:

what is the source for that image?

I don't know about those, but it's posted on the Internet on websites like this.

http://i.telegraph.c...6c_1443525i.jpg

[mcrom901]

TheMacGuffin, on 18 November 2012 - 07:09 PM, said:

I don't know about those, but it's posted on the Internet on websites like this.

http://i.telegraph.c...6c_1443525i.jpg

http://eol.jsc.nasa....=AS16-113-18339

[mcrom901]

TheMacGuffin, on 18 November 2012 - 07:05 PM, said:

There's another one here from Apollo 16.

http://spaceflight.n...-114-18423.html

[TheMacGuffin]

mcrom901, on 18 November 2012 - 04:23 AM, said:

that isn't real....

Yes, that's what I've heard, that he was using a screen saver from Star Trek or something.

This isn't an anomaly, but it is an interesting choice for a screen-saver.

Astronaut Jeffrey N. Williams, Expedition 13 NASA space station science officer and flight engineer, uses a computer in the Destiny laboratory of the International Space Station.


http://www.google.co...,r:13,s:0,i:113

[TheMacGuffin]

mcrom901, on 18 November 2012 - 07:19 PM, said:

http://spaceflight.n...-114-18423.html

So it's supposedly been cropped to take out the sunrise and make it look more mysterious.

Edited by TheMacGuffin, 18 November 2012 - 07:23 PM.

[mcrom901]

TheMacGuffin, on 18 November 2012 - 07:22 PM, said:

So it's supposedly been cropped to take out the sunrise and make it look more mysterious.

what do you think?

http://www.lpi.usra....?AS16-114-18422
http://www.lpi.usra....?AS16-114-18424

[FLOMBIE]

Lense flare.

[Colonel Rhuairidh]

TheMacGuffin, on 18 November 2012 - 06:03 PM, said:

This one from Apollo 16 calls them "uncropped photo lights", but like the Apollo 14 lights they appear to be distant objects.



Blue UFO anomalies imaged on the Moon during Apollo 16 of
Astronaut John Young. AS16-113-18339 120:25:42 (OF300)


John Young jumps off the ground and salutes for this superb tourist picture. He is off the ground about 1.45 seconds which, in the lunar gravity field, means that he launched himself at a velocity of about 1.17 m/s and reached a maximum height of 0.42 m. Although the suit and backpack weigh as much as he does, his total weight is only about 65 pounds (30 kg) and, to get this height, he only had to bend his knees slightly and then push up with his legs. In the background, we can see the UV astronomy camera, the flag, the LM, the Rover with the TV camera watching John, and Stone Mountain. Journal Contributor Joe Cannaday notes that high-point of John’s first jump was at a time close to 120:25:49 and the second was almost exactly three seconds later. Some uncropped photos show lights at the top. http://history.nasa.gov
Thanks to Will Allen http://www.ufodc.com/
http://www.google.co...29,r:5,s:0,i:86

They're obviously studio lights that they forgot to crop out when it was filmed in a studio in Hollywood, of course.

[bee]

TheMacGuffin, on 18 November 2012 - 06:06 PM, said:

http://www.google.co...29,r:1,s:0,i:74

setting aside the blue lights (or lack of them) for a minute....we seem to have a shadow problem?

Ie. where is the shadow from the astronaut? And if you use the magnifier on this one that mcrom posted

  http://www.hq.nasa.g...113-18339HR.jpg

the way the boots meet the ground isn't right...and again lack of shadow.

Just thought I'd mention it....as the whole subject of shadow malfunctions and wrong directions of shadows

is a bit of a big subject with the Apollo images....so no need to get side-tracked onto it.

.

[Colonel Rhuairidh]

bee, on 18 November 2012 - 08:26 PM, said:

setting aside the blue lights (or lack of them) for a minute....we seem to have a shadow problem?

Ie. where is the shadow from the astronaut? And if you use the magnifier on this one that mcrom posted


the way the boots meet the ground isn't right...and again lack of shadow.

Just thought I'd mention it....as the whole subject of shadow malfunctions and wrong directions of shadows

is a bit of a big subject with the Apollo images....so no need to get side-tracked onto it.

.

Dear god, please, yes, let's leave that in C & SS where it belongs.

[JimOberg]

bee, on 18 November 2012 - 08:26 PM, said:

the way the boots meet the ground isn't right...and again lack of shadow.

Just thought I'd mention it....as the whole subject of shadow malfunctions and wrong directions of shadows

The

boots

do

NOT

"meet

the

ground."

Slap yourself around the face three times,
get a grip, and come back to us a better person.

[TheMacGuffin]

747400, on 18 November 2012 - 07:52 PM, said:

They're obviously studio lights that they forgot to crop out when it was filmed in a studio in Hollywood, of course.

Oberg should be glad that I'm not one of those who imagines that the moon landings were all fake.  I just think that NASA has always been covering up anything to do with ETs and UFOs.

[TheMacGuffin]

UFO Hunters had a show about NASA's UFO cover up, with all the altered and airbrushed pictures, etc, etc.