Jump to content
Join the Unexplained Mysteries community today! It's free and setting up an account only takes a moment.
- Sign In or Create Account -

where can i buy the moon landing is fake video


seeking

Recommended Posts

ive never seen this, and have been dying to for forever, but icant seem to find it anywhere, i looked at amazon.com and nothing

does anyone have the title or a place where i can buy this thing

im looking for the documentry stating that we never did land on the moon and that it was indeed made up, it goes into depth about why they feel it was a hoaxed video, please help if you can, thank you

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Replies 102
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

  • Stellar

    23

  • smallpackage

    17

  • seeking

    10

  • Sunofone

    9

Top Posters In This Topic

Posted Images

I reccomend you get a P2P sharing program such as Kazza Ressurection.

There are a few videos about the moon landing conspiracy available for download...

Link to comment
Share on other sites

yea i got kazaa and limewire, i really want the actual copy though as not only is my connection 56k but id like to have for my collection

Link to comment
Share on other sites

so FOX was the network that aired it?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I would do a GOOGLE search. Perhaps type this: Moon landing hoax video

I do not believe in ANY way there was a hoax, but willing to assist your inquiry.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

i dont beleive there was a hoax either i just want to see the dang docutmentrary and i did actually do a google search and i came up with "a funny thing happneed on the way to the moon" does that sound familiar to anyone

Link to comment
Share on other sites

i dont beleive there was a hoax either i just want to see the dang docutmentrary and i did actually do a google search and i came up with "a funny thing happneed on the way to the moon" does that sound familiar to anyone

402647[/snapback]

You might find something in one of these Links.

It does seem it was made by FOX as well.......

Link to comment
Share on other sites

here you go! santa.gif

The Top 15 Reasons Why No Man Has Ever Set Foot on the Moon

user posted image

15. "Tricky Dick" Richard Nixon was president at the time. He was the king of cover-up, secret tapes and scandal. Think about all of his potential antics that were not discovered.

14. A successful manned mission to the moon offered a wonderful pride-boosting distraction for the near revolt of the US citizens over 50,000 deaths in the Vietnam War.

user posted image

13. The Soviets had a five-to-one superiority to the U.S. in manned hours in space. They were first in achieving the following seven important milestones:

1. First manmade satellite in earth orbit…

2. First man in space…

3. First man to orbit the earth…

4. First woman in space…

5. The first crew of three astronauts onboard one spacecraft…

6. The first space walk…

7. The first of two orbiting space craft rendezvousing…

This put America at a perceived military disadvantage in missile technology during the very height of the Cold War.

user posted image

12. Neil Armstrong, the first man to supposedly walk on the moon, refuses to give interviews to anyone on the subject. "Ask me no questions, and I'll tell you no lies." Collins also refuses to be interviewed. Aldrin, who granted an interview, threatened to sue us if we showed it to anyone. See streaming video: "Buzz says, "Buzz Off!"

11. Newly retouched photographs correct errors from previously released versions. Why would they be updating thirty-year-old pictures if they really went to the moon?

user posted image

With Prop ID "C"

user posted image

After: "C" Removed

user posted image

10. Rediscovered lost footage shows the American flag blowing in the wind. The wind was probably caused by intense air-conditioning used to cool the astronauts in their lightened, uncirculated, space suits. The cooling systems in the backpacks would have been removed to lighten the load not designed for earth's six times heavier gravity, otherwise they might have fallen over. See streaming video: "Flag blowing in the wind."

user posted image

9. Enlarged photographs underneath the lunar lander's 10,000 lb. thrust engine show the soil completely undisturbed. During ground tests there was grave concern for the vehicle falling into the hole the engine created as it descended. An oversight that they would have to keep consistent for all subsequent moon missions. They attributed it to the effect of no atmosphere (except for the flag blowing in the wind - see # 10!)

user posted image

8. Rare, uncirculated photographs, allegedly from the moon's surface, show scenes supposedly lit solely by sunlight. Yet they contain shadows that do not run parallel with each other, indicating supplemental artificial light. Sunlight would cast shadows that would never intersect.

http://www.moonmovie.com/photographic_analysis.ram

See our streaming video: "Photographic Analysis" for some eye opening examples.

7. The moon is 250,000 miles away. The space shuttle has never gone more than 400 miles from the Earth. Except for Apollo astronauts, no humans even claim to have gone beyond low-earth orbit. When the space shuttle astronauts did get to an altitude of 400 miles, the radiation of the Van Allen belts forced them to a lower altitude. The Van Allen radiation belts exist because the Earth's magnetic field traps the solar wind.

http://www.moonmovie.com/radiation_belt.ram

See streaming video: "Radiation Belts."

6. The top portion of the lunar module which landed on the moon supposedly popped up off the moon with two astronauts aboard, entered lunar orbit 60 miles up, and docked with the command module in lunar orbit. To look at its design and think such could have actually occurred is absolutely ludicrous.

5. The surface of the moon is a vacuum. The landing module would have been heated to 250 degrees on the light side where they landed. There is no way they could have rejected the heat for as long as 72 hours as they claim on some Apollo missions.

user posted image

4. Take a look at the lunar module which supposedly flew from lunar orbit to the surface of the moon. It is a cylindrical shape with a high center of gravity and one big thrust engine at the bottom. Upon just looking at this design, to think it would not immediately pinwheel and crash, as the lunar module trainer did three weeks prior on Earth, is absurd.

3. After the Apollo 11 mission, Armstrong, Collins and Aldrin gave a press conference. When asked whether they remembered seeing any stars from the surface of the moon, Collins, who was supposedly in the command module the whole time, gave a wrong answer to a question he should not have been answering. The relevant portion of this clip is in my documentary; viewing it with an understanding of the circumstances makes it clear they were lying about having traveled to the moon. I'm saying Collins blew it right then and there and I honestly cannot understand why there is even further discussion on the whole topic. Furthermore, if you obtain a written transcript of the press conference you'll see that the comment is erroneously attributed to Aldrin. Honest mistake or cover-up?

2. In 1967 three astronauts were burned alive on the launch pad. The upshot of the congressional inquiry was that the entire Apollo program was in shambles and it was a miracle no one was killed sooner. All of the problems were supposedly fixed by 1969, just two years later. How could they have made such a large improvement in "quality control" in such a short period of time.

1. All Apollo missions stayed in low-earth orbit for the duration of the trip. We uncovered some mislabeled, unedited, behind-the-scenes footage from NASA that shows the crew of Apollo 11 clearly staging a shot of being half-way to the moon. This clip, shown in our documentary, proves they did not leave low-earth orbit. You won't see this anywhere else!

http://www.moonmovie.com/

http://www.moonmovie.com/15things.html

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Man, do you honestly want me to debunk that (again), or will you just forfeit?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

haha, but i think i did find what i was looking for, thanks for all your help!

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Man, do you honestly want me to debunk that (again), or will you just forfeit?

403954[/snapback]

well ive been through this before as well and the bottom line is that anyone who is trying to prove the hoax has to convince the smartest and highest iq type individuals that they have been lied to by nasa(concerning data gathered by their instruments which forms the basis for many theories)which is an impossibility as these people(prof. and astronomers) "know" it all-this aside if you step back and observe the situation in its entirety the hoax becomes apparent-only the apollo missions have claimed to have ventured into and beyond the VARB(vanallenradiationbelts)-if it had really been as easy as it appeared there should be no doubt that we would have maintained a sustained campaign-there are so many holes that this could really get drawn out-go down to reason 9 and observe the pic there is no evidence of thruster disharge-yet when armstrong took that first step and the photograph was released of the imprint the texture of the surface was like talc the imprint was also exhibiting a level of humidity in the medium-from the altered pics, the shadows,the deaths in 67',the video of the module failing miserably just three weeks prior to the begining of the missions and the obvious military advantages its not that far-fetched-we could argue about this for ever but the truth is until we venture into the belts again neither side will be truly vindicated- santa.gif

Edited by Sunofone
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Holy crap man! Punctuate your text!

Link to comment
Share on other sites

^^I was going to say the same thing...Got lost.

I do believe it was staged. Another thing is, Why can't we see the flag or rovers that they left there? We can see crystal clear formations on far away planets such as jupiter, but where is the picture of the flag on the moon? (From space). Also, why do they want to go back when going to Mars years from now. I don't know about you guys, but The movie "Mission to Mars" seemed real, very real. 20 years from now - Easy as sh** to fake.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Limewire is way better than kazaa... trust me.... I ahd it before and it's usually spam. Download it on limewire.... hymmmm... I just might do that today if I get bored. mellow.gif

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Limewire is way better than kazaa... trust me.... I ahd it before and it's usually spam. Download it on limewire.... hymmmm... I just might do that today if I get bored. mellow.gif

405728[/snapback]

Is there a rule for no piracy on here? And they all give off adware/spyware. Have fun formatting your computer. yes.gif

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Did Russia automatically give up going to the moon after we accomplished it? Why are we the only country to have gone there? Has anyone else tried and failed due to the VARB?

Stellar impress me. Don't resort to critiquing someones grammer when you have nothing informative to add.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Why is there such a big thing about the moon landing being fake, i still believe that man did set foot on the moon so many years ago. But i supose there are people who still cant comprehend people going into space.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Stellar impress me. Don't resort to critiquing someones grammer when you have nothing informative to add.

I would, but without punctation in that long post, I cant seperate the ideas nor can I understand sometimes which phrase goes with which idea. If he'd punctuate it, I'd be able to seperate it into the different ideas, and debunk them one at a time.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Stellar impress me.  Don't resort to critiquing someones grammer when you have nothing informative to add.

406648[/snapback]

wiseguy i must first say that is THE coolest avatar i have seen-second the reason stellar cannot reply intellectually is because i already countered the 'logic" he would have tried to use by discrediting nasa and the credibility of their information IMHO-of course he can always point out that nasa is a far better source than i am but it does nothing to detract from the "big picture",the details of which i covered in my post,and the ultimate truth that until we go again neither side will be vindicated rofl.gif

Link to comment
Share on other sites

wiseguy i must first say that is THE coolest avatar i have seen-second the reason stellar cannot reply intellectually is because i already countered the 'logic" he would have tried to use by discrediting nasa and the credibility of their information IMHO-of course he can always point out that nasa is a far better source than i am but it does nothing to detract from the "big picture",the details of which i covered in my post,and the ultimate truth that until we go again neither side will be vindicated

Punctuate your preview post and we'll see how well your word stands...

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Now I want you guys to think for a minute. It was in the 1950s when we went just above the atmosphere into the tad bit of space. When we were just peeking into the universe as a spec. Not being able to go far without loosing contact with the world. A little over 10 years later, we set foot on the moon which is 250,000 miles away. Now, unless there was some scientific breakthrough, I doubt we could accomplish that technology in 10 years. And you lads know it.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

well not necessarily true, think about how the car was invented, long hours and years to develop a working engine and a platform to actually move people, once thats out the way, the advancements follow one another easily like top speed, you allready got the base for it, all you ahve to do is tweek this and tune that and bam 50 more horses, same can be said with our space ship technology we developed what we needed to get into space, once there it is easy to travel to the chosen point (moon)

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Guest
This topic is now closed to further replies.
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.