Jump to content




Welcome to Unexplained Mysteries! Please sign in or create an account to start posting and to access a host of extra features.


* * * * * 1 votes

Zimmerman trial


  • Please log in to reply
1449 replies to this topic

#1261    Kowalski

Kowalski

    The Original Penguin Conspiracy Theorist

  • Member
  • 4,102 posts
  • Joined:14 Mar 2013
  • Gender:Female
  • Location:* Madgascar *

  • It's All Some Kind Of Wacked Out Conspiracy....

Posted 23 July 2013 - 11:28 PM

View PostMichelle, on 23 July 2013 - 10:06 PM, said:

And there are very few men, period, that have never heard a car door lock, because a woman didn't feel safe alone stopped at a traffic light or parking lot when they walk by.

Very true, and it nothing to do with their skin color, either.


#1262    DieChecker

DieChecker

    I'm a Rogue Scholar

  • Member
  • 18,655 posts
  • Joined:21 Nov 2005
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:Portland, Oregon, USA

  • Hey, I'm not wrong. I'm just not completely right.

Posted 23 July 2013 - 11:53 PM

View PostMichelle, on 23 July 2013 - 10:06 PM, said:

And there are very few men, period, that have never heard a car door lock, because a woman didn't feel safe alone stopped at a traffic light or parking lot when they walk by.
Totally agree.

I've locked the door on my own car, even when alone, much less with my family, when various men, women and teenagers have paused nearby. It is not always possible to tell what anyone is going to do. Portland Oregon is known for being Weird, and so lots of Weirdos wander the streets constantly. Also Portland is known for being very Homeless Friendly, so we have lots of the Homeless here too. Plus various religious people preaching on the streets. Plus individuals who go around trying to sell various substances... So regardless of sex, clothing, race, or any other variable of appearance, you can't say for sure that anyone really is safe.

I don't agree with the idea that if a woman locks her door when a white male passes by, she is being prudent and practicing personnal safety, but if she locks the door when a black male passes by, she is being a racist.

Here at Intel we make processors on 12 inch wafers. And, the individual processors on the wafers are called die. And, I am employed to check these die. That is why I am the DieChecker.

At times one remains faithful to a cause only because its opponents do not cease to be insipid. - Friedrich Nietzsche

Qualifications? This is cryptozoology, dammit! All that is required is the spirit of adventure. - Night Walker

#1263    DieChecker

DieChecker

    I'm a Rogue Scholar

  • Member
  • 18,655 posts
  • Joined:21 Nov 2005
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:Portland, Oregon, USA

  • Hey, I'm not wrong. I'm just not completely right.

Posted 23 July 2013 - 11:59 PM

View PostAaronsmom, on 23 July 2013 - 09:20 PM, said:

I wonder too if what GZ did is try to detain TM so he wouldn't get away before the police arrived. If that's what happened, I can see GZ using his gun to force TM to stay. If GZ was fairly close to TM, I think it's likely that TM knew he couldn't run because GZ could shoot him. But if GZ was close enough to TM, TM may have thought he had a chance to rush GZ to get the gun away from him. If he dived for the gun, it's a good bet a struggle ensued, which would be how they ended up on the ground and how GZ got the injuries to the back of his head. I can see either of them screaming for help in that scenario. In that struggle, GZ could have pulled the trigger at point blank range, killing TM.

That is a possible scenario. It fits all the physical evidence at the scene. But one problem that I see is that the various neighbor witnesses all reported hearing the yelling and looking out and then calling 911. And almost all of them seem to leave only enough time, from when the fight starts, to allow for only some quick rolling around on the ground and then a gunshot. I don't think there was enough time for all the actions you have in your hypothetical fight.

I think it is possible that GZ pulled his gun ahead of time, to try to capture TM, but there is no actual evidence of that. The girl on the phone who was talking with TM to right when they started fighting did not say anything about a gun, or GZ threatening TM.

Here at Intel we make processors on 12 inch wafers. And, the individual processors on the wafers are called die. And, I am employed to check these die. That is why I am the DieChecker.

At times one remains faithful to a cause only because its opponents do not cease to be insipid. - Friedrich Nietzsche

Qualifications? This is cryptozoology, dammit! All that is required is the spirit of adventure. - Night Walker

#1264    Michelle

Michelle

    Forum Divinity

  • Member
  • 15,005 posts
  • Joined:03 Jan 2004
  • Gender:Female
  • Location:Tennessee

  • Eleanor Roosevelt: Great minds discuss ideas; average minds discuss events; small minds discuss people.

Posted 24 July 2013 - 12:40 AM

View PostDieChecker, on 23 July 2013 - 11:59 PM, said:

I think it is possible that GZ pulled his gun ahead of time, to try to capture TM, but there is no actual evidence of that. The girl on the phone who was talking with TM to right when they started fighting did not say anything about a gun, or GZ threatening TM.

As much as the prosecution wanted her to back their scenario, she was their worst witness. How people can disregard her statements, while on the phone with Martin, at the time of the incident, is beyond me.


#1265    Aaronsmom

Aaronsmom

    Astral Projection

  • Member
  • PipPipPipPipPip
  • 643 posts
  • Joined:11 May 2011
  • Gender:Female

Posted 24 July 2013 - 01:12 AM

View PostDieChecker, on 23 July 2013 - 11:59 PM, said:



That is a possible scenario. It fits all the physical evidence at the scene. But one problem that I see is that the various neighbor witnesses all reported hearing the yelling and looking out and then calling 911. And almost all of them seem to leave only enough time, from when the fight starts, to allow for only some quick rolling around on the ground and then a gunshot. I don't think there was enough time for all the actions you have in your hypothetical fight.

I think it is possible that GZ pulled his gun ahead of time, to try to capture TM, but there is no actual evidence of that. The girl on the phone who was talking with TM to right when they started fighting did not say anything about a gun, or GZ threatening TM.

I disagree the fight was too long for a struggle for a gun. I could see a fight like that taking 3 or 4 min., if the fighters were equally matched. All sorts of things could happen. The gun might have fallen on the ground once or twice, with both guys grabbing for it. They could have been locked in power struggle, with GZ gripping the gun and TM with his hands over GZ's trying to keep it pointed away from him. This could go on for a while.

The woman on the 911 call with the operator with calls for help heard in the background didn't see the two men at all. She very clearly states that she can't see them, she doesn't want to go out to look, she doesn't know who they are, nor has she any idea what the fight is about. So it seems to me nothing in that call negated the scenario I presented. I could see it happening that way, but it's only one theory. I could never say I believe that's what happened beyond a reasonable doubt. So had I been on the jury, I would have had no choice but to acquit as well...but it would make me completely sick to do it.


#1266    Detective Mystery 2014

Detective Mystery 2014

    Poltergeist

  • Member
  • 2,502 posts
  • Joined:31 Jan 2013
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:twilight zone's outer limits

  • Mysteries are tomorrow's histories.

Posted 24 July 2013 - 02:14 AM

View PostMichelle, on 23 July 2013 - 10:06 PM, said:

And there are very few men, period, that have never heard a car door lock, because a woman didn't feel safe alone stopped at a traffic light or parking lot when they walk by.

I've heard that click a few times. It came with the territory of being male. I never blamed girls and women for it. We've always been more likely to be violent.

There is one reality with billions of versions.

#1267    DieChecker

DieChecker

    I'm a Rogue Scholar

  • Member
  • 18,655 posts
  • Joined:21 Nov 2005
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:Portland, Oregon, USA

  • Hey, I'm not wrong. I'm just not completely right.

Posted 24 July 2013 - 02:47 AM

View PostAaronsmom, on 24 July 2013 - 01:12 AM, said:

I disagree the fight was too long for a struggle for a gun. I could see a fight like that taking 3 or 4 min., if the fighters were equally matched. All sorts of things could happen. The gun might have fallen on the ground once or twice, with both guys grabbing for it. They could have been locked in power struggle, with GZ gripping the gun and TM with his hands over GZ's trying to keep it pointed away from him. This could go on for a while.

The woman on the 911 call with the operator with calls for help heard in the background didn't see the two men at all. She very clearly states that she can't see them, she doesn't want to go out to look, she doesn't know who they are, nor has she any idea what the fight is about. So it seems to me nothing in that call negated the scenario I presented. I could see it happening that way, but it's only one theory. I could never say I believe that's what happened beyond a reasonable doubt. So had I been on the jury, I would have had no choice but to acquit as well...but it would make me completely sick to do it.
Yeah, but all of them seem to suggest that the fight started and ended pretty quickly, like around 1 minute. if the fight was 4 minutes long it would have started when GZ hung up on 911 and like 2 minutes Before TMs phone hung up on Jeantel.

http://en.wikipedia...._Trayvon_Martin

Quote

7:13:41 — The end of Zimmerman's call to Sanford police.[14]
7:16:00 – 7:16:59 — Martin's call from the girl goes dead during this minute.[14][15]
7:16:11 — First 911 call from witness about a fight, calls for help heard.[16]
7:16:55 — Gunshot heard on 911 call.[17]

According to this timeline, there was less then a minute between when TMs phone went dead (when Jeantel said she heard someone just starting to fight), and when TM got shot.

Here at Intel we make processors on 12 inch wafers. And, the individual processors on the wafers are called die. And, I am employed to check these die. That is why I am the DieChecker.

At times one remains faithful to a cause only because its opponents do not cease to be insipid. - Friedrich Nietzsche

Qualifications? This is cryptozoology, dammit! All that is required is the spirit of adventure. - Night Walker

#1268    Aaronsmom

Aaronsmom

    Astral Projection

  • Member
  • PipPipPipPipPip
  • 643 posts
  • Joined:11 May 2011
  • Gender:Female

Posted 24 July 2013 - 06:16 AM

View PostMyles, on 23 July 2013 - 05:08 PM, said:


My bad, I just googled it and got wrong info.  
I didn't see   B37 as being very effective at swaying others at all.   I think all 6 seen the evidence presented and voted accordingly.

No problem. I just wanted to be accurate. I'm not saying B37 swayed other jurors. I was only responding to a comment you made that you doubted 1 juror could influence other jurors. My point is I think it's possible one person can be enormously influential in persuading others to come around to his way of thinking. I don't know that's what happened--obviously I wasn't there. In her interview, B37 did say there was one holdout. She was the one who wanted more information about the manslaughter charge. Putting it altogether, I suspect the "holdout" was leaning toward a guilty verdict to manslaughter. A lot of people speculate the one holdout was the Hispanic juror. I think it must happen sometimes that a single dissenting juror changes his vote on the basis of being the "odd man out" and wanting to conform--or possibly to get things over with so they can all go home. That's not how it should be, but I'm a realist; these are people and they can't leave their human nature outside the deliberation room like muddy shoes.


#1269    danielost

danielost

    Forum Divinity

  • Member
  • 30,211 posts
  • Joined:26 Nov 2007
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:the only known inhabited planet in the universe

Posted 24 July 2013 - 06:22 AM

View PostKowalski, on 23 July 2013 - 11:28 PM, said:



Very true, and it nothing to do with their skin color, either.

What I found funny, is when I was hitchhiking.  The older lady doing 40mph rolling their windows up.  Guess they thought I was able to hit a moving target.

I am a Mormon.  If I don't use Mormons believe, those my beliefs only.
I do not go to church haven't for thirty years.
There are other Mormons on this site. So if I have misspoken about the beliefs. I welcome their input.
I am not perfect and never will be. I do strive to be true to myself. I do my best to stay true to the Mormon faith. Thanks for caring and if you don't peace be with you.

#1270    Aaronsmom

Aaronsmom

    Astral Projection

  • Member
  • PipPipPipPipPip
  • 643 posts
  • Joined:11 May 2011
  • Gender:Female

Posted 24 July 2013 - 06:25 AM

View PostDieChecker, on 24 July 2013 - 02:47 AM, said:


Yeah, but all of them seem to suggest that the fight started and ended pretty quickly, like around 1 minute. if the fight was 4 minutes long it would have started when GZ hung up on 911 and like 2 minutes Before TMs phone hung up on Jeantel.

http://en.wikipedia...._Trayvon_Martin


According to this timeline, there was less then a minute between when TMs phone went dead (when Jeantel said she heard someone just starting to fight), and when TM got shot.

OK, I can buy that. But that only makes my suggested theory all the more possible, not less likely. If Zimmerman got close to TM and held his gun on TM, ordering him to stop right there, and TM chooses instead to lunge for the gun, A struggle between the two to get control of the gun could happen in a minute or less.


#1271    docyabut2

docyabut2

    Government Agent

  • Member
  • 3,619 posts
  • Joined:12 Aug 2011

Posted 24 July 2013 - 08:56 AM

I think if Z had his gun out, he would have fired at TM`s frist punch,not waited to be jumped on and beaten all most into unconscious,Even Jantel believes TM threw the frist punch


In an interview with HuffPost Live’s Marc Lamont Hill this week, Rachel Jeantel, Trayvon Martin’s friend and “star witness” in the George Zimmerman trial, said she believes Martin threw the first punch in the altercation that resulted in his death last year.
“I believe Trayvon hit first,” she said.

http://www.theblaze....yvon-hit-first/


#1272    Ryinrea

Ryinrea

    Princess of Yang

  • Member
  • 2,591 posts
  • Joined:20 Oct 2009
  • Gender:Female
  • Location:Humble, Texas

  • "Clark, you can't save the world. All you'll end up with is a messiah complex and a lot of enemies." -Lex Luthor Smallville

Posted 24 July 2013 - 11:43 AM

View Postdocyabut2, on 24 July 2013 - 08:56 AM, said:

I think if Z had his gun out, he would have fired at TM`s frist punch,not waited to be jumped on and beaten all most into unconscious,Even Jantel believes TM threw the frist punch


In an interview with HuffPost Live’s Marc Lamont Hill this week, Rachel Jeantel, Trayvon Martin’s friend and “star witness” in the George Zimmerman trial, said she believes Martin threw the first punch in the altercation that resulted in his death last year.
“I believe Trayvon hit first,” she said.

http://www.theblaze....yvon-hit-first/

I belive Trayvon punched first, after Zimmerman grabbed Trayvon", she said.  I read the whole thing in context, I don't pick and choice what to read too fit my world view. I love facts not out of context blurbs of a interview from someone.  

However if Zimmerman had the gun out beforehand, which is more likely than him getting out with in his hostiler looking for an adress. Thus the point Regi was making that he lied about how the the incident went down in the frist place.

  My dad has CC license but doesn't feel the need too carry a gun everywhere, he goes to, if zimmerman feels he must carry everywere he goes he's either paronid or needs too move to a diffrent neghiborhood.  



In fact most of the witness testimonty, contracts Zimmerman's stories of events. I still cannot see how the jury came to the  conlusion he was not guilty.  One of the jurors known as B37 even admited in her interview thier was false truths in Zimmerman story of events. She even went so far as too say she put in too much on what the dectetive said of Zimmermans story.( The jury was told to ingore that part of testimonay).


She also still said she thought "his heart was in the right place, and he learned a good leson about not going too far". Yes she did say that in her interview with Anderson Cooper.



Quote

“In every country and every age, the priest had been hostile to Liberty.” - Thomas Jefferson

#1273    regi

regi

    Poltergeist

  • Member
  • 2,461 posts
  • Joined:28 May 2012
  • Gender:Female
  • Location:Texas

Posted 24 July 2013 - 01:14 PM

View PostDieChecker, on 23 July 2013 - 08:28 PM, said:

I'll agree that if people want to blame the Jury for letting GZ go, then they are actually blaming the Prosecusion and the DAs office. They have to approve every juror, just as the defense does.

A poster was assessing the jurors and I commented that six others could have come to another decision.
If you don't agree with that, that's fine, but you seemed to turn what I said into something it wasn't.

View PostDieChecker, on 23 July 2013 - 08:28 PM, said:

That he's tapping on the flashlight does not prove anything. It may Suggest something, but proves nothing. Perhaps that is why he stood at Retreat View Circle for several minutes. Trying to fix his flashlight. That theory has just as much chance of being true as yours does.

I don't pick apart evidence and circumstances and offer some other alternative explanation.
I take the facts and circumstances and apply common sense and I take a lot of time, thought and consideration as I do so, and every opinion I form or conclusion I arrive at is based on fact, circumstance, and common sense.

View PostDieChecker, on 23 July 2013 - 08:28 PM, said:

Almost every single person who was a witness in this trial had some detail that was wrong or said something that was obviously wrong. The key Prosecution witness, Jeantel, was just as big a liar.

I wasn't talking about "every single person"...I was talking about the man who was on trial for shooting and killing an unarmed teen and who was claiming self defense.
If Zimmerman lied and/or emvbellished any event of that evening, then he shouldn't be believed about any events of that evening, period.
Once someone's been shown to lie and or embellish, then in weighing credibility, one has to look to how that lie/embellishment benefits that person.

Observation: You believed Jeantel when she said that Martin referred to Zimmerman as a creepy ass cracker, but you chose not to believe her re: the dialogue of the confrontation.

View PostDieChecker, on 23 July 2013 - 08:28 PM, said:

I'll agree with that, GZ kept remembering details and saying that this happened over there and back there I actually did this and that. They should have done several walk throughs with him and then done a re-enactment with the timeline completely correct.

That re-enactment was unacceptable.
It's inadequate as a re-enactment, regardless, but once correlated with the police call, the statements to Singleton and the written statement, then it should have been glaringly apparent.


#1274    Ryinrea

Ryinrea

    Princess of Yang

  • Member
  • 2,591 posts
  • Joined:20 Oct 2009
  • Gender:Female
  • Location:Humble, Texas

  • "Clark, you can't save the world. All you'll end up with is a messiah complex and a lot of enemies." -Lex Luthor Smallville

Posted 24 July 2013 - 02:05 PM

Die checker, you choice to belive that Trayvon said this creppy ass cracker,  which most teens say all the time in innner city schools. The word cacker is another form of Redneck. Its      iiii

Quote

“In every country and every age, the priest had been hostile to Liberty.” - Thomas Jefferson

#1275    DieChecker

DieChecker

    I'm a Rogue Scholar

  • Member
  • 18,655 posts
  • Joined:21 Nov 2005
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:Portland, Oregon, USA

  • Hey, I'm not wrong. I'm just not completely right.

Posted 24 July 2013 - 02:06 PM

View Postregi, on 24 July 2013 - 01:14 PM, said:

A poster was assessing the jurors and I commented that six others could have come to another decision.
If you don't agree with that, that's fine, but you seemed to turn what I said into something it wasn't.
Huh? Who was chosen for the Jury or not (As in "6 others") was directly done by the Prosecution. They are directly related.

If your point is simply that 6 other people might have decided differently, then that still falls on the Prosecution, as they picked these people, and likely would chose people with similar attitudes and ethos.

Quote

I don't pick apart evidence and circumstances and offer some other alternative explanation.
I take the facts and circumstances and apply common sense and I take a lot of time, thought and consideration as I do so, and every opinion I form or conclusion I arrive at is based on fact, circumstance, and common sense.
That is exactly what you are doing.... Cherry picking tiny bits of evidence and weaving a story out of it and calling it Proof.

My alternative explaination fits the same evidence. What is common sense to you may not be so for everyone else.

Quote

I wasn't talking about "every single person"...I was talking about the man who was on trial for shooting and killing an unarmed teen and who was claiming self defense.
So you're going to cherry pick who you chose to believe? You're going to throw out evidence because one person is a liar and then hold tight to other evidence presented from another liar? That is call hypocracy, I believe.

Quote

If Zimmerman lied and/or emvbellished any event of that evening, then he shouldn't be believed about any events of that evening, period.
Once someone's been shown to lie and or embellish, then in weighing credibility, one has to look to how that lie/embellishment benefits that person.
This goes directly to what I posted earlier. Almost every witness "remembered" details later, or embellished their account. Should all those people's testemony be tossed out? It is a simple Yes or No, thank you.

Quote

Observation: You believed Jeantel when she said that Martin referred to Zimmerman as a creepy ass cracker, but you chose not to believe her re: the dialogue of the confrontation.
I've used the term in sarcastic remarks, but I've never based a single bit of my opinion on any of the racist remarks Miss Jeantel said. Other posters have pushed this angle, that Jeantel was a racist and TM also, but I've not waded into that.

Quote

That re-enactment was unacceptable.
It's inadequate as a re-enactment, regardless, but once correlated with the police call, the statements to Singleton and the written statement, then it should have been glaringly apparent.
I agree. It is bad enough that I think we shouldn't even be talking about what happened in that re-enactment, because it was done so badly.

And yet 90% of Anti-GZ remarks are that his Testemony did not match the Re-enactment, which did not match his police statement. The large events were roughly the same, but details changed.

Here at Intel we make processors on 12 inch wafers. And, the individual processors on the wafers are called die. And, I am employed to check these die. That is why I am the DieChecker.

At times one remains faithful to a cause only because its opponents do not cease to be insipid. - Friedrich Nietzsche

Qualifications? This is cryptozoology, dammit! All that is required is the spirit of adventure. - Night Walker




0 user(s) are reading this topic

0 members, 0 guests, 0 anonymous users