10148 replies to this topic

[seeder]

Abramelin, on 18 January 2013 - 07:50 PM, said:

And then still you had time to search for actual information, not merely watch video clips from your favorite guru.

Research doesn't take too long tho does it, specially in zosers case. And rarely if ever - do I watch his clips, and I cant think why Id want to see 600 odd of the them!

[seeder]

Abramelin, on 18 January 2013 - 08:01 PM, said:

The ones I met in Peru and Bolivia were tough and strong people, both women and men.

I can easily imagine thousands of them sweating and toiling to pull a huge boulder along.

and thats another great point to make, Modern man is lazy, weak, and fast become the most obese set of humans ever..

ancient man however, was faster, fitter and much much stronger than the current version!  Mountain dwellers, just like sheep that graze mountains, have terrific leg strength

a useful attribute when dragging huge rocks..

so modern man cant move this stone?  No bloody wonder, modern man is lazy by comparison

Edited by seeder, 18 January 2013 - 08:13 PM.

[zoser]

Abramelin, on 18 January 2013 - 07:09 PM, said:

Did Foerster see another giant human face in some cliff?

-

The remaining stone may be perfectly finished, but cutting molten rock won't explain it, however much you repeat it.

If the rock was molten and then cut out with something sharp , the corners would also be sharp.
They are not.


.

Who says it needed to be that sharp?  

In any case you call this not sharp?







Exactly how sharp do you want it?

On the wrong pc at the moment.

Later I will show you the mortar.

Just finishing off an AA episode.

[Abramelin]

Just now I am watching a Japanese guy performing in some NatGeo documentary.

A baseball pitcher throws a ball at full speed to this guy, and he chops it in half with his samurai sword in only 0.4 seconds to react.

And he does the same thing with something the size of a fkg pill!!

I don't know if it's on YouTube, but the guy is amazing.... and most importantly: he is NOT an alien.

Meaning: people are able to do amazing things. Training, willpower determination, and no need for aliens.

++

EDIT:

Here is part of that documentary, where this guy splits a pill in mid air that was shot at him:

Edited by Abramelin, 18 January 2013 - 08:26 PM.

[Abramelin]

zoser, on 18 January 2013 - 08:14 PM, said:

Who says it needed to be that sharp?  

In any case you call this not sharp?







Exactly how sharp do you want it?

On the wrong pc at the moment.

Later I will show you the mortar.

Just finishing off an AA episode.

You need a close-up of the corners.

Well, you already did post them, and they were rounded.

[zoser]

Abramelin, on 18 January 2013 - 06:41 PM, said:

So you see mortar? Where?

If the Inca did do this and I no reason to dispute the claim, it will not suffice as evidence that they were able to replicate high precision work.

[zoser]

Abramelin, on 18 January 2013 - 08:20 PM, said:

You need a close-up of the corners.

Well, you already did post them, and they were rounded.

Look pretty good to me.  I still don't see that they need to be precise.  Why does a tool need to be that sharp to cut into soft stone?  I really don't see what your getting at.

[Abramelin]

zoser, on 18 January 2013 - 08:44 PM, said:

If the Inca did do this and I no reason to dispute the claim, it will not suffice as evidence that they were able to replicate high precision work.

No, what you think is mortar is nothing but 'vitrification', lol.

And it could be the result of lichens.

But you are not really serious, right?

The blocks I posted an enlarged pic of (from the same wall) don't show any mortar.

And the 'gaps' are shadows. I can post a similar image using YOUR photos.

Here:

 Zoser.jpg   82.18K   12 downloads


And your arrows point at NOTHING at all.

.

Edited by Abramelin, 18 January 2013 - 09:03 PM.

[zoser]

Awe inspiring precision at Puma Punku

[Abramelin]

Sandstone.

[Colonel Rhuairidh]

So were they just showing off, then?

[zoser]

Abramelin, on 18 January 2013 - 08:49 PM, said:

No, what you think is mortar is nothing but 'vitrification', lol.

And it could be the result of lichens.

But you are not really serious, right?

The blocks I posted an enlarged pic of (from the same wall) don't show any mortar.

And the 'gaps' are shadows. I can post a similar image using YOUR photos.

Here:

.

That's your picture I can assure you.

Looks like mortar or some filling material to me.  The point is that if you are looking for evidence of Inca high precision that will not do.

Lichen, shadows or not it's not evidence.

One other minor question.  Can we be sure where they got the stones from?  Are we sure that they cut them?  Or was it stone from an already dismantled wall.  Because we know that recycling of old blocks did occur.

Abramelin, on 18 January 2013 - 09:01 PM, said:

Sandstone.

Proof?

Edited by zoser, 18 January 2013 - 09:05 PM.

[Colonel Rhuairidh]

zoser, on 18 January 2013 - 09:03 PM, said:

Proof?

  proof that it was in fact ETs that did it?

[zoser]

Lord Vetinari, on 18 January 2013 - 09:01 PM, said:

So were they just showing off, then?

Not sure what your getting at.

[zoser]

Lord Vetinari, on 18 January 2013 - 09:06 PM, said:

  proof that it was in fact ETs that did it?

The technology was not available to the Aymara indians.  Plus on the AA documentary they made the obvious point that such an endeavour would need planning, blueprints, language, logistics writing, number skills, and this is something the Aymara were known not to possess.

It's obvious if you think it through.

Proof of spacecraft not needed.