joc, on 22 October 2012 - 12:25 AM, said:
No...because the brain produces thought process. The question is: If the blood was pumped into a completely different person would that different person recall the same experience?
I hate to quote Wikipedia on anything but it was the quickest in this case so here goes:
Quote
"Consciousness is the quality or state of being aware of an external object or something within oneself."
"Blood" does not produce consciousness. The ONLY question is whether it is the brain that produces that consciousness, or the brain merely houses that consciousness while we are "in the body" (alive), with the brain directing that consciousness through it's various functions.
This entire thread is arguing that consciousness is separate from the brain and that once the "housing" (the functioning brain) is removed from the equation, then that consciousness leaves the brain and moves on to other, higher realms.
Blood plays no part in consciousness, other than in keeping the brain working.
As for the brain, it is either:
1) "Housing" that consciousness as long as it is working (and that consciousness moves on after it stops working),
or
2) Creating that consciousness and keeping it active only as long as the brain is working.
The only question here is whether that consciousness is always confined to the human brain or is, in fact, only temporarily confined to it as long as the brain is functioning.
Blood isn't related to consciousness in any other way than, if you believe option number 2, it helps keep that brain functioning. Blood is no more important regarding consciouness than the liver or pancreas, etc.
In those cases, as well as with the blood, if you removed them then the brain stops functioning. The only question then is whether or not consciousness then ceases or continues in a different form.
.
Edited by Shabd Mystic, 22 October 2012 - 11:59 AM.