Jump to content




Welcome to Unexplained Mysteries! Please sign in or create an account to start posting and to access a host of extra features.


* * * * - 7 votes

The Ancient Alien Theory Is True


This topic has been archived. This means that you cannot reply to this topic.
10148 replies to this topic

#1111    Myles

Myles

    Government Agent

  • Member
  • 4,241 posts
  • Joined:08 Jan 2007

Posted 09 December 2012 - 04:01 AM

C'mon.   Anyone who cannot admit that Ancient Aliens is only entertainment is not thinking logically.


#1112    DONTEATUS

DONTEATUS

    Forum Divinity

  • Member
  • 17,404 posts
  • Joined:15 Feb 2008

Posted 09 December 2012 - 04:06 AM

WHats it all about ? Did anyone get the proof that E.T built this stuff yet ?
I didnt think so !
Oh  ! And Santa`s Gotta be an Alien ! just Look at the History,Flying craft,Time it takes him to get-er-Done ? The Proof is in the Cookies !

Edited by DONTEATUS, 09 December 2012 - 04:08 AM.

This is a Work in Progress!

#1113    badeskov

badeskov

    Forum Divinity

  • Member
  • 11,236 posts
  • Joined:27 Aug 2006

Posted 09 December 2012 - 05:38 AM

View PostMyles, on 09 December 2012 - 04:01 AM, said:

C'mon.   Anyone who cannot admit that Ancient Aliens is only entertainment is not thinking logically.

Frankly, I don't even find it remotely entertaining.

Cheers,
Badeskov

"Life is not a journey to the grave with the intention to arrive safely in a pretty and well-preserved body, but rather to skid in broadside, thoroughly used, totally worn out, and loudly proclaiming: Wow!! What a ride!". Said to to Dean Karnazes by a running buddy.

#1114    zoser

zoser

    Sapphire

  • Member
  • 10,009 posts
  • Joined:19 Aug 2009

Posted 09 December 2012 - 08:47 AM

View PostAbramelin, on 08 December 2012 - 09:12 PM, said:

Zoser, you are not giving the Peruvian people credit for what they and their ancestors were capable of.

We now may not know exactly  how they did it, but the Spanish conquistadores knew and were present when these Incas were on the job.

Because you and I are no stone workers, that doesn't mean aliens were needed using 'advanced technology' to construct those buildings.


I too have respect for the ancient indiginous people.  That's why I believe what they say:

1) They denied building the megalithic structures.
2) A previous culture existed before they did.

That's what respect means to me.

Please don't look to me make some kind of 'reformation'.  It's not going to happen.  The AA hypothesis is only becoming more not less popular; more books and more documentaries than ever are now being made.

I too read Von D decades ago.  Since then he has been well supported by scores of like minded scientific people.  I have been on this forum for over 3 years and I have never moved one inch from my original convictions and nor will I do so.

In my previous role I was an engineer and I did this for 23 years.  I know what it takes to quarry, move, finish and position hundred tonne blocks and I know it is beyond the capability of people just emergent from the stone age.

It's a very simple adding up process.  

So respect?  Yes I have it.  Let the Inca tell you what happened not the school historians.


Edited by zoser, 09 December 2012 - 08:49 AM.

Posted Image


#1115    zoser

zoser

    Sapphire

  • Member
  • 10,009 posts
  • Joined:19 Aug 2009

Posted 09 December 2012 - 08:52 AM

View PostAbramelin, on 08 December 2012 - 09:34 PM, said:

Von Däniken?

He is a known fraud.

He was even convicted and put in jail because of it.

And he also admitted to have lied. Why? Because he wanted his message to get across.

How many archaeologists have been imprisoned?  What were they imprisoned for?  Don't forget that Von D is now only one of scores of people saying the same thing.  Very serious full time researchers.  Brien Foerster being another good example.

View PostAbramelin, on 08 December 2012 - 11:32 PM, said:

What you think of Santa?

Is he real or not?

Show me his megaliths walls.

Edited by zoser, 09 December 2012 - 08:58 AM.

Posted Image


#1116    zoser

zoser

    Sapphire

  • Member
  • 10,009 posts
  • Joined:19 Aug 2009

Posted 09 December 2012 - 08:55 AM

View PostAbramelin, on 08 December 2012 - 11:35 PM, said:

Archeological evidence of some unknown, and non-understandble technology.

And up to now, there is none.

.

Abe I have provided you with testimony, artefact, reasoning, supporting scientific argument from other men time and time again.  Whether you choose to believe it is your divine right which I respect.  

Archaeologists just cherry pick facts and research.   If some fellow researcher isn't in their club they will reject it.  Hawass being a very good example.

Posted Image


#1117    theSOURCE

theSOURCE

    Alien Abducter

  • Member
  • 4,450 posts
  • Joined:23 Sep 2003

Posted 09 December 2012 - 09:00 AM

View Postzoser, on 09 December 2012 - 08:47 AM, said:

*snip*
I have been on this forum for over 3 years and I have never moved one inch from my original convictions and nor will I do so.

That reads like a perfect example of a closed mind. I guess the debate's over and it's time to move on. :tu:


edit for typos

Edited by theSOURCE, 09 December 2012 - 09:03 AM.


#1118    Imaginarynumber1

Imaginarynumber1

    I am not an irrational number

  • Member
  • 4,503 posts
  • Joined:22 Mar 2010

Posted 09 December 2012 - 10:08 AM

View PostGaden, on 09 December 2012 - 03:16 AM, said:

Three excellent clips on the subject. Definitive, actually. I present them knowing full well only the sceptics will watch...
Done by supersoylent, who has a great sense of humor and way with words. If you can't stand profanity, don't watch. Thanks goes to Abremelin, on who's blog I first saw these. Enjoy.





Part 2 was great. It called out AA on a bunch of the BS they put forth that gets parroted here.

"A cat has nine lives. For three he plays, for three he strays, and for the last three he stays."


July 17th, 2008 (Full moon the next night)

RAPTORS! http://www.unexplain...pic=233151&st=0


#1119    Big Bad Voodoo

Big Bad Voodoo

    High priest of Darwinism

  • Member
  • 9,582 posts
  • Joined:15 Nov 2010

Posted 09 December 2012 - 10:56 AM

View PostMyles, on 09 December 2012 - 04:01 AM, said:

C'mon.   Anyone who cannot admit that Ancient Aliens is only entertainment is not thinking logically.

Show Ancient Aliens is entertainment. It is show in the end. I just dont know how historical community so far didnt ask that they clearly announce that isnt educational program but rather entertainment.

But I dont see nothing wrong about idea itself. Of all that historical accounts only one needs to be true. :tu:

JFK: "And we are as a people, inherently and historically, opposed to secret societies, to secret oaths, and to secret proceedings.
For we are opposed around the world by a monolithic and ruthless conspiracy..."

#1120    Sir Wearer of Hats

Sir Wearer of Hats

    SCIENCE!

  • Member
  • 10,305 posts
  • Joined:08 Nov 2008

Posted 09 December 2012 - 11:12 AM

View Postzoser, on 09 December 2012 - 08:47 AM, said:

.

In my previous role I was an engineer and I did this for 23 years.  I know what it takes to quarry, move, finish and position hundred tonne blocks and I know it is beyond the capability of people just emergent from the stone age.

which simply reinforces my theory that they were built by an undocumented (or perhaps unacknowledged is a better word) human culture.
Or perhaps the legend of Princess Scota of Egypt and her entorage making it to the Americas isn't as mad as it seemed.

I see no need for aliens when the wit and ingenuity of man would suffice.

I must not fear. Fear is the Mind-Killer. It is the little death that brings total obliteration. I will face my fear.
I will permit it to pass over me and to move through me. And when it is gone I will turn the inner eye to see it's path.
When the fear is gone, there will be nothing.
Only I will remain.

#1121    Abramelin

Abramelin

    -

  • Member
  • 18,108 posts
  • Joined:07 May 2005

Posted 09 December 2012 - 03:24 PM

View Postzoser, on 09 December 2012 - 08:47 AM, said:

I too have respect for the ancient indiginous people.  That's why I believe what they say:

1) They denied building the megalithic structures.
2) A previous culture existed before they did.

That's what respect means to me.

Please don't look to me make some kind of 'reformation'.  It's not going to happen.  The AA hypothesis is only becoming more not less popular; more books and more documentaries than ever are now being made.

I too read Von D decades ago.  Since then he has been well supported by scores of like minded scientific people.  I have been on this forum for over 3 years and I have never moved one inch from my original convictions and nor will I do so.

In my previous role I was an engineer and I did this for 23 years.  I know what it takes to quarry, move, finish and position hundred tonne blocks and I know it is beyond the capability of people just emergent from the stone age.

It's a very simple adding up process.  

So respect?  Yes I have it.  Let the Inca tell you what happened not the school historians.


"1) They denied building the megalithic structures"

They denied builiding Tiwanaku, not  the buildings in Peru.

2) A previous culture existed before they did.

The Incas conquered many tribes that existed before they came into existense, yes.

The AA hypothesis is only becoming more not less popular; more books and more documentaries than ever are now being made.

Popularity is not the same as credibility. A 100 million people thinking the earth is flat doesn't make it a truth.

I too read Von D decades ago.  Since then he has been well supported by scores of like minded scientific people.

I want to know who these "scientific people" are. As far as I know no scientist on this rock supports Von Däniken's fabrications.

So respect?  Yes I have it.  Let the Inca tell you what happened not the school historians.

They told us, the conquistadores  told us,  but you just don't want to listen.


.

Edited by Abramelin, 09 December 2012 - 03:25 PM.


#1122    zoser

zoser

    Sapphire

  • Member
  • 10,009 posts
  • Joined:19 Aug 2009

Posted 09 December 2012 - 03:36 PM

View PostAbramelin, on 09 December 2012 - 03:24 PM, said:

"1) They denied building the megalithic structures"

They denied builiding Tiwanaku, not  the buildings in Peru.

2) A previous culture existed before they did.

The Incas conquered many tribes that existed before they came into existense, yes.

The AA hypothesis is only becoming more not less popular; more books and more documentaries than ever are now being made.

Popularity is not the same as credibility. A 100 million people thinking the earth is flat doesn't make it a truth.

I too read Von D decades ago.  Since then he has been well supported by scores of like minded scientific people.

I want to know who these "scientific people" are. As far as I know no scientist on this rock supports Von Däniken's fabrications.

So respect?  Yes I have it.  Let the Inca tell you what happened not the school historians.

They told us, the conquistadores  told us,  but you just don't want to listen..

Not true; the Inca deny responsibility for the megalithic structures.

Here is an interesting piece of writing and something I have long since suspected regarding colonial South America.  What kind of nation was Spain in a religious sense at the time of the invasion?  Answer; fanatically Catholic.  What was the Catholic church doing at the time of the invasion?  Answer; the Inquisition.  Any one or anything remotely judged as heresy was either tortured or destroyed.

This needs contemplating:

The Inca did not build the original temples at Machu Picchu or Cusco.

Our story gets so much larger when we listen to the wisdom keepers of the ancient traditions. The histories known to the old cultures around the world tell of highly advanced ancient civilizations; and of the coming and going of ages punctuated by world cataclysms. Where ‘modern science’ has dismissed the histories as given by indigenous cultures as mere myth; there are now a few brave researchers, who are willing to face the rejection of the mainstream academics and are publishing the suppressed evidence supporting the knowledge of our ancient ancestors.

In the Americas during the European invasion, after the church sanctioned destruction of so much of the arts and records, a few of the Spanish got around to asking the native history keepers their stories. What was then told and chronicled is quite different than what is generally accepted today. During the 1600’s, in Peru, the Spanish chronicler Fernando Montesinos recorded the histories of the Quechua speaking peoples of Cusco, Peru, those now calledInca.*


http://sacredheritag...ilizations.html

How could the Spanish not have destroyed vital records?  Those that did not would have themselves faced a grissly end.

What were the Spanish really interested in?  We all know the answer I'm sure.

Regarding your question about the AA proponents.  Who do you think they are?  Men off the street?  Some of them may well be, others highly qualified.  You know their names Abe.  No need to give you a list.

Again respect is due here me thinks.

Edited by zoser, 09 December 2012 - 03:37 PM.

Posted Image


#1123    zoser

zoser

    Sapphire

  • Member
  • 10,009 posts
  • Joined:19 Aug 2009

Posted 09 December 2012 - 03:47 PM

More examples of megalithic precision stonework; blocks weighing over 200 tonnes.  Archaeology can only offer the most banal explanations as to how it was done.

Ollyantaytambo

Posted Image

Posted Image


#1124    zoser

zoser

    Sapphire

  • Member
  • 10,009 posts
  • Joined:19 Aug 2009

Posted 09 December 2012 - 03:51 PM

Also at Ollyantaytambo:

Posted Image


We again see two types of construction.  This is a common phenomena.  Megalithic precision close to much more inferior constructions.  This should in my opinion raise deep suspicions.

Posted Image


#1125    Abramelin

Abramelin

    -

  • Member
  • 18,108 posts
  • Joined:07 May 2005

Posted 09 December 2012 - 04:06 PM

View Postzoser, on 09 December 2012 - 03:51 PM, said:

Also at Ollyantaytambo:

Posted Image


We again see two types of construction.  This is a common phenomena.  Megalithic precision close to much more inferior constructions.  This should in my opinion raise deep suspicions.

And this site was still under construction when the Spanish conquistadores arrived.