Nowadays, eyewitness accounts can only take you so far. Without concrete forensics to confirm any of the claims, unfortunately, the whole accountability falls apart.
I agree that there is no proof that satisfies everyone and I have myself found many holes in what has been written by Daniken and Sutchin
I am watching a doco right now about the marianas trench in the pacific ocean and Sitchin says that the earth used to be unstable and located where the asteroid belt is now and that an unproven planet entered the solar system and stabilised the solar system by exploding part of the unstable planet earth and after the explosion this earth became the asteroid belt and the planet earth but in the new orbit
now that would mean that this trench should be the oldest thing on the planet and that would be 4/5 billion years and yet the scientists are saying that they prove that this trench is only 170 million years old
this seems to disprove Sitchin
I do believe that there is more to ancient history than what the mainstream experts can prove
I say we should all read the books about these things [if we want to] and just wait til whatever can be proven will be proven.
until proven one way or the other it can simply be something we can all wonder about if we want to
in the meantime i want to have an antediluvian life span please of at least a few thousand years