10148 replies to this topic

[seeder]

Wearer of Hats, on 23 January 2013 - 10:54 PM, said:

And here's a quote from amodern Catholic (repeat CATHOLIC)
.

gotta luv Wearer of Hats!

[seeder]

Crikey, on 23 January 2013 - 11:30 PM, said:

No offence mate but I don't give a rat's ass what Catholics say..

well what is your belief then? What do you give a rats rse about? Come young warrior with a broken arrow , tell me what  troubles you so?

[DingoLingo]

zoser, on 23 January 2013 - 08:57 PM, said:

Three places where similar precision megalithic architecture are known to exist all lie on a straight line.  How true is this?  What could the significance of this be?

This is in a very good you tube documentary:

Ancient Pyramids and Megaliths


Check it out.  Not the Ancient Alien team.  Be warned; the archaeological community does not get a very favourable review.

like it has been said.. they appear to be in a straight line.. when in actual fact they are not..

there are 1000's of miles difference in the supposed straight line zoser..

you really have to stop getting sucked in on this stuff and actually look at it..

heck get the gps coordinates and put them on a bigger map.. you will see they dont line up straight..

[Slave2Fate]

Crikey, on 23 January 2013 - 11:30 PM, said:

No offence mate but I don't give a rat's ass what Catholics say..
(It's nothing personal, I don't give a sh**  what Mormons, Jehovahs, Baptists, Calvinists, Rapturists, Pentecostalists, Munchkins etc say either)

Unless it supports an alien hypothesis right? You do know the difference between confirmation and information right? You already have a conclusion firmly entrenched and you only look for bits and pieces to support that conclusion, which is neither objective nor 'open minded' as some like to call it. Taking those little bits and pieces out of context even further removes your hypothesis from any justifiable position. Your vision is narrow and you are only seeing what you wish to see.

[DingoLingo]

zoser, on 23 January 2013 - 09:16 PM, said:

Another curio.

Earlier on in the thread, some pictures were posted of the Japanese Imperial Palace showing undeniable precision architecture.



The context of this was my assertion the later culture in Peru (Inca) built less precise work on top of earlier precision megalithic.  Simply because they were unable to replicate the work of the earlier high technology.  All they could do was extend or build on top of high quality work.

Here is what looks like another entrance of the same palace.



Interesting.  Looks like whoever did this above was again unable to replicate the high precision.

Same builders or earlier builders?  Exactly the same thing is seen in Peru.  Amazing when we see the same enigmas in different parts of the world.

Whoever did this and whenever they did it they clearly could not replicate the earlier precision.  I wonder why?

actually that is a good question zoser..

at a guess it would depend on who was the emperor at the time .. where they building.. or were they repairing.. which entrance came first.. the older looking one.. or the higher precision one..

[DingoLingo]

Slave2Fate, on 23 January 2013 - 11:43 PM, said:

Unless it supports an alien hypothesis right? You do know the difference between confirmation and information right? You already have a conclusion firmly entrenched and you only look for bits and pieces to support that conclusion, which is neither objective nor 'open minded' as some like to call it. Taking those little bits and pieces out of context even further removes your hypothesis from any justifiable position. Your vision is narrow and you are only seeing what you wish to see.

heh to be honest.. I've put crikey on the troll list.. so far he has not put up anything that makes me believe that he is anything but a troll

[Sir Wearer of Hats]

Crikey, on 23 January 2013 - 11:30 PM, said:

No offence mate but I don't give a rat's ass what Catholics say..
(It's nothing personal, I don't give a sh**  what Mormons, Jehovahs, Baptists, Calvinists, Rapturists, Pentecostalists, Munchkins etc say either)

well then keep your hands off the beliefs of those people then - if you can't care for the people then what should you care to think of their beliefs?

[Crikey]

seeder, on 23 January 2013 - 11:33 PM, said:

well what is your belief then? What do you give a rats rse about? Come young warrior with a broken arrow , tell me what  troubles you so?

Young warrior? What? Where? Surely you can't mean me,  I'm an old fart aged 64..
As I've proclaimed before, no Organised Religion has got its hooks into your old Crikey, I don't need O.R. to do my thinking for me!
I like to think I'm simply a mate of Jesus, nothing more nothing less, that's all he asks of any of us..

"You're my friends if you follow me. I don't call you servants, but I call you friends......You have one teacher, me" (John 15:15, Matt 23:10)

[Crikey]

Wearer of Hats, on 23 January 2013 - 11:54 PM, said:

well then keep your hands off the beliefs of those people then - if you can't care for the people then what should you care to think of their beliefs?

Oops now I never dare answer my door again!..

Edited by Crikey, 24 January 2013 - 12:09 AM.

[Sir Wearer of Hats]

It's a good thing you don't believe in anything deeply Crikey, because it'd be a damn shame if some arrogant armchair expert on the Internet were to come along and appropriate it for their own ends.
But at least, you get to make snarky jokes about the Inquisition, so it's all good.

[DBunker]

Close to trolling, if you ask me.

[Crikey]

Wearer of Hats, on 24 January 2013 - 12:09 AM, said:

It's a good thing you don't believe in anything deeply Crikey, because it'd be a damn shame if some arrogant armchair expert on the Internet were to come along and appropriate it for their own ends.
But at least, you get to make snarky jokes about the Inquisition, so it's all good.

Between you and me mate, I've got a sneaking admiration for Paganism, i've had a soft spot for them ever since they burned Edward Woodward in a Wicker Man, he thoroughly deserved it for his bad acting.
Same in the remake, they toasted Nicholas Cage too for squashing a wasp on the pub bar, served him right...

Edited by Crikey, 24 January 2013 - 01:37 AM.

[Crikey]

But back to the Ancient Stones topic, the twin villages of Alton Barnes and Alton Priors in Wiltshire lie 15 miles north of Stonehenge and have been a focus of crop circle/UFO activity for many years, they're technically two separate villages but they're so close to each other that they're almost touching.
Alton Priors church is circled (left click pics to enlarge)



Built in the 12th century (but some kind of sacred site was there long before that), Alton Priors church stands alone (below) at the heart of UFO country with ancient sarsen stones buried beneath its floor.
Unusually for most English churches, nobody seemed to want to build homes near it..

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Sarsen

http://en.wikipedia....h,_Alton_Priors

http://www.themodern....com/site/2233/

Okay here's my stunning theory- Maybe sarsen stones are some kind of "navigation beacons" for UFO's?
Maybe ancient peoples saw UFO's being attracted to sarsen stones and assumed they were demonic, so they carted the stones away and buried them under the hallowed church floor? Maybe they still attract UFO's?
Incidentally, sarsens were used to construct some parts of Stonehenge-

Edited by Crikey, 24 January 2013 - 01:28 AM.

[seeder]

Crikey, on 23 January 2013 - 11:30 PM, said:

No offence mate but I don't give a rat's ass what Catholics say..
(It's nothing personal, I don't give a sh**  what Mormons, Jehovahs, Baptists, Calvinists, Rapturists, Pentecostalists, Munchkins etc say either)

That must be why you were locked out of their forums

(Crikey  said: As for what Org Religionists think of me, this message I get from them when trying to log back into their websites and forums speaks volumes-
"Your account has been disabled, please do not make any attempt to participate further in any of our Communities"

[seeder]

Crikey, on 24 January 2013 - 12:52 AM, said:

But back to the Ancient Stones topic, the twin villages of Alton Barnes and Alton Priors in Wiltshire lie 15 miles north of Stonehenge and have been a focus of crop circle/UFO activity for many years, they're technically two separate villages but they're so close to each other that they're almost touching.
Alton Priors church is circled (left click pics to enlarge)



Built in the 12th century (but some kind of sacred site was there long before that), Alton Priors church stands alone (below) at the heart of UFO country with ancient sarsen stones buried beneath its floor.
Unusually for most English churches, nobody seemed to want to build homes near it..

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Sarsen

http://en.wikipedia....h,_Alton_Priors

http://www.themodern....com/site/2233/

Okay here's my stunning theory- Maybe sarsen stones are some kind of "navigation beacons" for UFO's?
Maybe ancient peoples saw UFO's being attracted to sarsen stones and assumed they were demonic, so they carted the stones away and buried them under the hallowed church floor? Maybe they still attract UFO's?
Incidentally, sarsens were used to construct some parts of Stonehenge-

well at least youre getting up to speed and posting sources. So in your wiki link we learn that:

"Sarsen stones are sandstone blocks found in quantity in the United Kingdom on Salisbury Plain, the Marlborough Downs, in Kent, and in smaller quantities in Berkshire, Essex, Oxfordshire, Dorset and Hampshire. They are the post-glacial[1] remains of a cap of tertiary silcrete which once covered much of southern England"

OK so the stones are pretty much 'everywhere' then, or were till land was no doubt, cleared for farming/housing etc, because a 'glacier' deposited them there. If any stones are under the church, it seems good building practice to establish a solid base/foundations to build upon doesnt it? Cant see any mystery there at all.

You mention no-one wants to live near a church... we lived half a mile from a village church when I was a lad, the bells on Sunday, or weddings, or funerals, even half a mile away in a quiet village used to drive us bonkers.. so again I don't find it a mystery. Plus factor in who owns the land all round the church,  which is usually the church of course, and we can also think that the church simply didn't allow its land to be used for building, again its plausible. Modern homeowners get into fits of rage if a new building is to be built close to them, its how people are. Or maybe, there were historic non marked graves there, and again, who the heck wants to take a chance and disturb the old bones by digging and building there?

And why the hell would UFOs navigate by stones? Its outrageous to even think that they traverse tremendous distances in space, (with no direction signs), they make it here, plus they naturally have a birds eye view of the lie of the land/continents....but have to swoop down low enough to look for stone navigation beacons?

Are you a raving lunatic?