10148 replies to this topic

[Imaginarynumber1]

Abramelin, on 29 December 2012 - 08:30 PM, said:

I never had real problems with IE.

But yes, I had some tiny ones.

But FF is annoying as hell.

And how do I check what version I use?

Maybe this is better discussed in private.

Just switch to Google Chrome. Way better than FF or the toilet that is IE.

[White Unicorn]

Abramelin, on 29 December 2012 - 07:02 PM, said:

Let me play moderator for a sec, and ask you all not to get 'personal'. And I am not being a hypocrite, I am guilty as sin.

But the topic interests me a lot.

I don't often join a thread about UFOs or aliens and stuff like that, but here we have solid material we can discuss, not some vague blob in the skies.

The worst I can accuse Zoser of is that he's as stubborn as a mule, lol.

Well, SO AM I !!


.

I know how you feel!  It's a subject that has facinated me too but you have to weed out so much garbage and speculation or the subject isn't taken seriously. There's many real mysteries out there that I'd like to see solved but unfortunately the real seekers get tired of sorting through it all because we're left with over zealous believers or die hard sceptics to be able to have a serious discussion sometimes. There's more than a few grand tit bits of information to be shared about many things.  I agree that we have solid material we can discuss, not some vague blob in the skies. I hope the sceptical researchers out there don't lose interest and miss important clues that even an over zealous believer might bring to light.

[Abramelin]

Zoser says:

"You have a fascination for ancient relics and that is beyond doubt.  We have a lot in common in that sense. The problem is that the ideas that you have cemented into yourself are not holding up in the light of a close scrutiny of the evidence.   You like a lot of others on this forum have been pushing the classic mainstream ideas for years now and I can well imagine it is difficult to change those ideas."

What I am 'pushing' is ANYTHING BUT the classic mainstream ideas.

Jesus, did you really read my posts??

[Imaginarynumber1]

nopeda, on 29 December 2012 - 08:33 PM, said:

Unless you're wrong, in which case it's YOUR idiotic "ideas" that belong in a landfill , not that you have any specific ideas to toss in one. You can't get that far. You can't get as far as the people you're trying to insult You're trying to insult people who have left you behind....

I don't have to insult anyone. Your level of intelligence is clearly show by what you post.

As for "specific ideas", I've thrown plenty out. Even first hand accounts of how some of these ancient sites were built. It was, of course, ignored. But that was almost 100 pages ago and I have no desire to rehash the same tired arguments with people who cover their ears and try to yell the loudest.

Edited by Imaginarynumber1, 29 December 2012 - 08:36 PM.

[seeder]

zoser, on 29 December 2012 - 08:29 PM, said:

Along comes Brien Foerster.


Please stick around because I have a summary to post on the precision architecture evidence and you may find it interesting.

Yeh him with few qualifications in the subject  -and a desire to increase revenue. Compared to the guy I offered with dedication of 20 years and the numero uno in the field, you go with a guy who has an impressive amount of videos, but nothing much to say.

why ignore a real expert and go with a nobody?

so back to architecture then.  or the quite convincing cone heads info a page ago...

Edited by seeder, 29 December 2012 - 08:37 PM.

[Abramelin]

Imaginarynumber1, on 29 December 2012 - 08:33 PM, said:

Just switch to Google Chrome. Way better than FF or the toilet that is IE.

I have been thinking about that, but installing Google Chrome is like asking the Nazis to be nice on you because you look  'only a bit Jewish'

.

Edited by Abramelin, 29 December 2012 - 08:46 PM.

[zoser]

JGirl, on 29 December 2012 - 06:58 PM, said:

to forbid is to be fascist? lol
no it's merely a word that means ''not allowed to"
i don't like it for the same reason as everyone else on this thread has for not liking it.
those videos are bullsh*t.
you have never once properly addressed any challenges on this thread. you merely paint over them with more nonsense.

All complaints to be in triplicate, signed in black ink and counter signed by the management.  

[Colonel Rhuairidh]

Imaginarynumber1, on 29 December 2012 - 08:33 PM, said:

Just switch to Google Chrome. Way better than FF or the toilet that is IE.

Oh, that doesn't work properly for me. YouTube doesn't play on it at all, ironically enough.
I know, some would probably see that as an advantage.

[nopeda]

Abramelin, on 29 December 2012 - 08:10 PM, said:

Quote

nopeda, on 29 December 2012 - 03:02 PM, said:
Not if they couldn't have done it. If they couldn't, and I still consider the possibility that in some cases they could not have, then it really is clear even though everyone can't see it clearly and some people can't see it at all... How could it be much more clear?

They could have done it.

I'm aware of that possibility. I'm also aware of another one that you're not able to comprehend, which is that in some cases they could not have. That's the starting line, but you can't get there. You may never get there during your entire life either, but that's it whether you ever reach it or not. If you do get there, somehow, some day, then what? We'll probably never know.

[seeder]

nopeda, on 29 December 2012 - 08:26 PM, said:

Of course there's the other possibility which is that they did help us, and it's even possible that humans wouldn't exist if they had not helped us. For all you know it is that way, yet you don't seem able to appreciate that sort of possibility.

I strongly suspect all your statements are down to a love of weird stories and your impressionable age... both are things I grew out of.. you know the old saying?  "When I was a child, I spoke and thought and reasoned as a child. But when I grew up, I put away those childish things" (originally Corinthians)

[JGirl]

zoser, on 29 December 2012 - 08:38 PM, said:

All complaints to be in triplicate, signed in black ink and counter signed by the management.  

lol yeah i'll get right on that

[Imaginarynumber1]

747400, on 29 December 2012 - 08:39 PM, said:

Oh, that doesn't work properly for me. YouTube doesn't play on it at all, ironically enough.
I know, some would probably see that as an advantage.

In a thread like this, a MAJOR advantage.

I've heard of that issue before. Some have resolved it by just redownloading Chrome, others by simply clearing their history and files. Unless it was the bug Chrome had back in August with Flash that they fixed.

[Myles]

zoser, on 29 December 2012 - 08:29 PM, said:

Along comes Brien Foerster.  A very dedicated guy who is investigating the claims about ancient high technology and also what he thinks is some major evolutionary anomaly in the form of skulls found at Paracas.  So dedicated is he that he works at a private museum full time.

He has uploaded over 600 video clips in the space of a year.  

He is a tour guide given a mandate to increase interest.   Of course he has uploaded so many videos.   His job depends on it.

Edited by Myles, 29 December 2012 - 08:47 PM.

[Abramelin]

nopeda, on 29 December 2012 - 08:40 PM, said:

I'm aware of that possibility. I'm also aware of another one that you're not able to comprehend, which is that in some cases they could not have. That's the starting line, but you can't get there. You may never get there during your entire life either, but that's it whether you ever reach it or not. If you do get there, somehow, some day, then what? We'll probably never know.

Can you talk sense or must I dig through your Twilight Zone drivel to find out what the hell you are talking about?

[Abramelin]

But no one here can give me an answer to what I asked:"How does head-binding influence someone's psyche?"

Does it cause these people to have epileptic seizures, were they crazy, were they considered to be 'psychics'? Did the other people consider them to be 'holy men' or 'holy women' because of their aberrant behaviour?